Guidelines for Launching Prosecution to Punishable Offences under
CA, 1962
·
Format for Investigation Report for
Launching Prosecution (Annex I)
[CBEC
Circular No. 07 dated 6th March 2017]
Subject–
Guidelines for launching of prosecution in relation to offences punishable
under Customs Act, 1962.
I
am directed to invite the attention of the field formations to the prosecution
guidelines issued by the Ministry vide Circular No. 27/2015-Customs dated 23.10.2015
(further amended vide Circular No. 46/2016-Customs dated 04.10.2016) revising
the guidelines issued vide order No.394/71/97-CUS (AS) dated 22.06.1999.
2.
The earlier prosecution guidelines of 1999 as well as the new prosecution
guidelines issued in 2015 contain various references to avoid any undue delays
in the launching of prosecution or completion of prosecution proceedings.
However, it has been observed that in spite of guidelines in this regard,
launching of prosecution / completion of prosecution proceedings gets delayed
in several cases. The delay in launching of prosecution has also been pointed
out by the Comptroller & Auditor General of India in its report recently.
3.
In this regard certain difficulties were brought to the notice of the Board.
Reportedly, one of the factors leading to delays in launching of prosecution is
lack of clarity regarding the role of Directorate General of Revenue
Intelligence (DGRI) vis-à-vis Customs field formations as to who should submit
the investigation report and who should launch prosecution.
4.
Board has examined the matter. Accordingly, for the sake of clearly defining
the role of DGRI vis-à-vis Customs field formations so that any delays on this
account can be prevented, Paras 7.1 to 7.5 of the prosecution guidelines issued
by the Ministry vide Circular No. 27/2015-Customs dated 23.10.2015 are
substituted by the following paras:
“7.1
Prosecution should not be filed merely because a demand
has been confirmed in the adjudication proceedings particularly in cases of
technical nature or where interpretation of law is involved. One of the
important considerations for deciding whether prosecution should be launched is
the availability of adequate evidence. The standard of proof required in a
criminal prosecution is higher as the case has to be established beyond
reasonable doubt whereas the standard of proof in adjudication proceedings is
decided on the basis of preponderance of probability. Therefore, even cases
where demand is confirmed in adjudication proceedings, evidence collected
should be weighed so as to likely meet the test of being reasonable doubt for
recommending & sanctioning prosecution. Decision should be taken on case-
to- case basis considering various factors, such as, gravity of offence, quantum
of duty evaded and the nature as well as quality of evidence collected.
7.2 It
is reiterated that in order to avoid delays, the adjudicating authority should
indicate, at the time of passing the adjudication order itself (on file and not
in the adjudication order) as to whether he considers the case fit for
prosecution, so that it could be further processed for launching prosecution.
Where at the time of adjudication proceedings, no view has been taken on
prosecution by the adjudicating authority, the adjudication section shall
resubmit
the file within 15 days from the day of issue of adjudication order to the
adjudicating authority/Commissioner to take a view regarding prosecution. Where
the prosecution is proposed before the adjudication of the case, Commissioner
/Pr. Commr. or ADGRI / Pr.
ADGRI shall record the reason for the same and the adjudicating authority shall
be informed of the decision so that there is no need for him to examine the
case subsequently from the perspective of prosecution.
7.3
In respect of cases investigated by DGRI, the
adjudicating authority would intimate the decision taken regarding fitness of
the case for prosecution to the Principal Additional Director General/
Additional Director General of the Zonal Unit or Headquarters concerned, where
the case was investigated and /or show cause notice issued. The respective
officer of DGRI concerned shall prepare an investigation report for the purpose
of launching prosecution, within one month of the date of receipt of the
decision of the adjudicating authority and would send the same to the Director
General, DGRI for taking decision on sanction of prosecution. The format of
investigation report is annexed as Annexure-I to this Circular. The DGRI
/ Pr. DGRI should ensure that a decision about launching of prosecution or
otherwise, is taken after careful analysis of evidence available on record and
communicated to the ADGRI / Pr. ADGRI concerned within a month of the receipt
of the proposal.
7.4
In respect of cases not investigated by DGRI, where the
Principal Commissioner/Commissioner who has adjudicated the case is satisfied
that prosecution should be launched, an investigation report for the purpose of
launching prosecution should be carefully prepared within one month of the date
of issuance of the adjudication order. Investigation report should be signed by
an Assistant/Deputy Commissioner, endorsed by the jurisdictional Principal
Commissioner/Commissioner and sent to the Principal Chief/ Chief Commissioner
for taking a decision on sanction for launching prosecution. The format of
investigation report is annexed as Annexure-I to this circular. The
Chief Commissioner/Principal CC should ensure that a decision about launching
of prosecution or otherwise, is taken after careful analysis of evidence
available on record and communicated to the Commissioner / Principal CC within
a month of the receipt of the proposal.
7.5
Once the sanction for prosecution has been obtained,
criminal complaint in the court of law should be filed as early as possible by
an officer not below the rank of Superintendent of the jurisdictional Commissionerate authorized by the Commissioner.
7.6
It is observed that delays in the Court proceedings
occur due to the non-availability of records required to be produced before the
Magistrate. As a matter of practice, whenever a case is taken up for seeking
the approval for launching prosecution, an officer should be
nominated/designated, who shall immediately take charge of all documents,
statements and other exhibits, that would be required to be produced before a
Court. The list of exhibits etc. should be finalised in consultation with the
Public Prosecutor at the time of drafting of the complaint. Such exhibits
should be kept in safe custody. Where a complaint has not been filed even after
a lapse of three months from the receipt of sanction for prosecution, the
reason for delay shall be brought to the notice of Chief Commissioner/Principal
CC or DGRI / Pr. DGRI by the Commissioner /Pr. Commr.
or ADGRI / Pr. ADGRI, as the case may be, who are
responsible in the case for ensuring the timely filing of the complaint.
5.
The field formations are hereby requested to circulate these amendments to all
the formations under their charge. Difficulties, if any, in implementation of
the aforesaid guidelines may be brought to the notice of the Board.
ANNEXURE – I
INVESTIGATION
REPORT FOR THE PURPOSE OF LAUNCHING PROSECUTION AGAINST__________________________________
COMMISSIONERATE___________________________/Divisions
1.
Name & address of the person (s) including legal persons.
2.
Nature of offence including commodity :
3.
Charges :
4.
Date/Period of offence :
5.
Amount of duty Evasion/value of contraband goods involved :
6.
Particulars of persons proposed to be prosecuted :
(a)
Name
(b)
Father’s name
(c)
Age__________________ Sex________________
(d)
Address
(e)
Occupation
(f)
Position held in the company/firm
(g)
Role played in the offence
(h)
Material evidence available against the accused (Please indicate separately
documentary and oral evidence)
(i) Action ordered against the accused in adjudication
proceedings
7.
Brief note as to why prosecution is recommended
Place:
Date:
(Deputy/Assistant
Commissioner)
Or
(Deputy/Assistant Director)
8.
I have carefully examined the investigation report and find it in order for
filing criminal complaint under section (s) (-------) of Customs Act, 1962.
Commissioner/
Pr. Commr.
Or
ADGRI/ Pr. ADGRI
ANNEXURE – I (contd.)
NOTE
(A)
The proposal should be made in the above form in conformity with the guidelines
issued by the Ministry. With regard to column 3 above, all the charging
sections in the Customs Act, 1962 and other allied Acts should be mentioned. If
the provision for conspiracy as under section 120-B of IPC is sought to be
invoked, this fact should be clearly mentioned. With regard to S.NO. 6,
information should be filed separately for each person sought to be prosecuted .
(B)
A copy of the show cause notice as well as the order of adjudication (where
applicable) should be enclosed with this Report. If any appeal has been filed
against the adjudication order, this fact should be specifically stated.
(C)
Where prosecution is being recommended even prior to completion of
adjudication, as per guidelines, brief reasons therefore be also indicated in
the brief note mentioned at Sl. No. 7 above.