Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP)
·
Refund
·
Demand
·
Adjudication
·
Review & Appeal
[CBEC
Circular No. 11 dated 31st March 2017]
Sub:
Clarification regarding amendment in Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006 in Rule
47, after sub-rule (4) dated 05.08.2016.
Representations
have been received from field formations requesting clarification regarding
amendments made in the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006 by way of inserting a
new Rule 47 (5) brought vide Department of Commerce (DoC)
Notification No. GSR 772(E) dated 05.08.2016 wherein functional operations like
Refund, Demand, Adjudication, Review and Appeal are to be made by
jurisdictional Customs and Central Excise authorities in accordance with the
relevant provisions contained in the Customs Act, 1962 & Central Excise
Act, 1994 and the Finance Act, 1994.
2. Doubts have
been raised regarding operationalization of these functions, appropriate
authority and time limitation in respect of these functional operations,
especially refund claims filed prior to the date of coming into effect of the
said notification, i.e. 05.08.2016. It has been further asked to clarify as to
who would be the appropriate authority, the Development Commissioner or the
jurisdictional Customs Authority to raise demand of duty, if need arises, in
respect of un-utilized capital goods/raw materials by a unit in case it exits/
opts out of the SEZ.
3. Matter has
been examined by the Board. The following clarification is accordingly issued
in this regard.
3.1 With
regard to whether these functional operations of refund, demand, adjudication
etc. are to be handled prospectively or retrospectively, it is a settled law
that unless, otherwise expressed specifically for retrospective application in
the notification itself, all notifications are applicable prospectively only.
Therefore, all new cases of refund, demand, adjudication, review and appeal are
to be made by the concerned jurisdictional authorities of Customs, Central
Excise and Service Tax under the provisions of the respective Acts. Also, with
the coming into effect of the GST laws in the near future, apart from
jurisdictional Customs Commissionerates, the
jurisdictional GST Commissionerates will be
responsible in respect of these functional operations with effect from the day
GST is rolled out.
3.2 The
standard operating procedures in respect of these functional operations would
be as provided in the table below:
|
Sl.No. |
Functional
Operation |
Standard
Operating Procedure (SOP) |
|
1
|
Refund
|
i.
The SEZ unit/ Developer shall file the refund application addressed to the
Deputy Commissioner/ Assistant Commissioner of policy or technical, as it may
be called, in the Office of Jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs, Central
Excise, Service Tax or GST as the case may be. ii.
If required, DC/AC (Policy/ Technical or as they may be called in the GST
regime) would seek comments from the office of the concerned Development
Commissioner on admissibility, limitation including aspects of unjust
enrichment of this refund claim under Customs law. iii.
The office of the Development Commissioner must provide comments within a
maximum period of 2 weeks from the date on which such communication is
received from the office of the DC/ AC (Policy/ Technical). iv.
DC/ AC (Policy/ Technical) will issue a Speaking Order while sanctioning such
refund claims. |
|
2
|
Demand
|
i.
The draft demand/ show cause notice shall be prepared by the Specified
Officer/ Authorized Officer in the concerned office of the Development
Commissioner and should be transferred to the DC/AC (Policy or Technical or
as they may be called in the GST regime) in the office of the jurisdictional
Customs/ Central Excise/ Service Tax or GST Commissioner at least 8 weeks
before the demand becomes time barred along with all Relied Upon Documents
(RUDs) ii.
DC/ AC (Policy or Technical) will be at liberty to examine all aspects with
respect to the demand, and if necessary, may seek further inputs/ information
from the office of the concerned Development Commissioner before putting up
to the appropriate authority based on the monetary limits prescribed for
issuance of the Show Cause Notice from time to time. iii.
Demand for the past period will be issued by the office of the jurisdictional
Commissioner of Customs/ Central Excise/ Service Tax/ GST if it is duly
sponsored by the Specified Officer/ Authorized Officer and the demand
confirms to the time limitation under Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax or
GST laws and procedure prescribed under (i) &
(ii) above. |
|
3
|
Adjudication
|
All
pending demands shall be adjudicated by the appropriate authority as
prescribed under the Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax or GST laws and the
rules made there under including demands issued prior to 05.08.2016 because
the act of adjudication is prospective in nature. |
|
4
|
Review
& Appeal |
Same
as provided under the Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax or the GST laws
and rules made there under. In case, a demand gets confirmed, the realization
there of must be initiated by the jurisdictional Customs/ Central Excise/
Service Tax/ GST authority. However, the office of the Development
Commissioner will assist the Customs authority in such realization as they
have the BLUT (Bond cum Letter of Undertaking) signed by the unit/ developer
and they are administratively under their jurisdiction. |
3.3 The question
now arises as to how the old cases of refund pending as on the date of the
coming into effect of this notification will be sanctioned/ entertained by the
Customs, Central Excise or Service Tax or Central GST authorities. The gap in
the law was that there was no provision of giving refund in SEZ law. That
provision has now been extended by way of amending SEZ Rules by inserting new
Rule 47 (5) empowering officers of Customs to issue refund claims. Therefore,
refund cases of past, which are otherwise in order, both on account of
limitation and merit (even though filed in the office of the Development
Commissioner) should be issued by Customs officers.
3.4 The
issue of interest on delayed payment of refund may arise in some cases.
However, in such cases, the date on which such refund claims are received by
jurisdictional Customs, Central Excise or Service Tax or Central GST field
formations would be relevant for our officers for the purpose of interest
rather than the period for which it was lying with SEZ authorities, for which
DOC will take necessary action as deem fit by them, if need arises.
3.5 The second
issue relates to appropriate authority to demand duty in case a unit opts out of
the SEZ scheme. As per Rule 74 of SEZ Rules, 2006, such exit shall be subjected
to payment of applicable duties on the imported or indigenous capital goods,
raw materials, components, consumables, spares and finished goods in stock. The
proviso to the said Rule states that if the unit has not achieved positive net
foreign exchange, the exit shall be subjected to penal action under the
provisions of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Therefore,
the Development Commissioner under the said Act may impose penalty on unit for
not achieving positive net foreign exchange. However, in respect of duty
benefits already taken on the unutilized capital goods/ raw materials for
carrying out authorized operations, demand, adjudication and appeal thereof
shall be made by the jurisdictional Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax
authority under Rule 47(5) of the SEZ Rules, 2006 as being brought out by
notification GSR 772(E) dated 05.08.2016 following procedure given in point no.
(i) and (ii) against ‘Demand’
in the table above.
4. Difficulty,
if any, in the implementation of this circular may be brought to the notice of
the Board.
F.No. DGEP/SEZ/51/2009 Part-II