Chief Commissioners to Issue Standing
Orders to Condone Late Filing of Bills of Entry without Penalty where
Department is Fault
[Ref: Instruction No. 12/2017-Customs
dated 31 August 2017]
Subject: Clarification on difficulties related to recent amendments in Customs
Act, 1962.
Kind reference is drawn
to Notification No. 26/2017-Customs (N.T.) and Notification No. 27/2017-Customs
(N.T.) dated 31.03.2017, amending Bill of Entry (Electronic Integrated Declaration)
Regulations, 2011 and Bill of Entry (Forms) Regulations, 1976 respectively to prescribe
late charges for delayed presentation of Bill of Entry. The said notifications have
been issued consequent upon the amendments brought in section 46 of the Customs
Act, 1962, vide Finance Act, 2017. Attention is also invited to Circular No. 12/2017-
Customs dated 31.03.2017, providing clarification with regard to amendments introduced
in section 46 and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962 vide Finance Act, 2017.
2. With regard to the
above provisions, Board has received representations regarding difficulties
being faced in implementation of the above stated provisions when there are problems
encountered due to instability of ICEGATE.
Issue in brief: Many a times,
importers have not been able to file Bill of Entry for clearance of imported goods
within stipulated time period because of certain technical problems related to ICEGATE
connectivity, server etc. It 1s also brought to notice of the Board that there
are instances when, even after filing a Bill of Entry within the prescribed time
period, it is subjected to payment of charges for late filing as its number is not
generated within the free period, prescribed under section 46 of the Customs Act,
1962.
3. Board has examined the issue and
accordingly following clarification is given.
Board is of the view that
importer should not be penalised for delay happening due
to any system related fault. In this regard, section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962
provides that payment of charges for late presentation of the Bill of Entry is subject
to existence of sufficient cause to the satisfaction of proper officer. The proper
officer in this regard is Additional or Joint Commissioner of Customs, as provided
in Notification No. 40/2012-Cus (N.T.) dated 02.05.2012. The jurisdictional Additional/Joint
Commissioners of Customs are advised to judiciously exercise power conferred on
them to ensure that the trade and stakeholders particularly the diplomatic community
are not put to undue hardship and necessary relief, as applicable, may be provided
to the importers in bona-fide cases. Jurisdictional Chief Commissioners are requested
to identify cases where reasons for late filing of Bill of Entry are not attributable
to the importers and issue suitable standing orders so that proper officers can
exercise powers in the interest of ease of doing business.
4. All Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs and Central Excise are requested
to issue suitable standing order, in view of the foregoing decisions taken by the
Board.
5. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of the above directions may be brought
to the notice of the Board.
F.No.450/10/2017-Cus IV