Relief to Call Centres and BPO Services Back-offices of IT Companies under
GST
July Circular Withdrawn to
Lift Coverage under “Intermediary Services” who provided other than own
account. These were classified as non exporters and
thus liable to 18% GST.
In what could be seen as a major relief
for corporates, especially multinational companies, the government has decided
to withdraw a circular on intermediary services under the GST.
This circular, issued in July, had
created a lot of upheaval in the back-office/IT services industry. Substantial
GST refunds were also stuck because of this circular, it is said. The
withdrawal should come as a relief to IT/ITeS
(IT-enabled services) firms and back-office support service providers.
The
withdrawal will be effective from July 18.
The circular said that multinational
companies will need to redefine their back-end support system for the
applicability of GST. The said circular intended to clarify on issues related
to supply of ITeS such as call centre
and business process outsourcing services and ‘intermediaries’ to overseas
entities under the GST law and whether they qualify as ‘export of services’ or
not.
In cases where BPO Services on accounts
other than his account, the service provider will come under the GST ambit and
be required to pay tax at the rate of 18 per cent. It was emphasised
that a supplier of service would not be treated as intermediary, if the
services are provided on his own account, despite him qualifying as an
agent/broker.
The circular was ambiguous and continued
to fuel the debate as to which back-end services constitute as support services
(during pre-delivery, delivery, post-delivery of supply, post
sales support) and which services would qualify as ‘arranging or
facilitating the supply of goods or services between two or more persons’.
The authorities were placing reliance on
the now superseded circular to issue show cause notices to back-office support
providers. Also, a lot of GST refunds were held up by the tax authorities, on
account of services qualifying as ‘intermediary’ and hence not exports.
However, one would need to understand the legal implications of withdrawal of
the circular, before deciding the future course of action.
[CBIC Circular No.
127/46/2019 – GST dated 4 December 2019]
Subject: Withdrawal
of Circular No. 107/26/2019-GST dt.
18.07.2019 .
Kind
attention is invited to Circular No. 107/26/2019-GST dated 18.07.2019 wherein
certain clarifications were given in relation to various doubts related to
supply of Information Technology enabled Services (ITeS
services) under GST.
2.
Thereafter, numerous representations were received expressing apprehensions on
the implications of the said Circular. In view of these apprehensions and to
ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across
field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section
168(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, hereby withdraws,
ab-initio, Circular No. 107/26/2019-GST dated 18.07.2019.
3.
It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the
contents of this Circular.
F. No. CBEC –
20/06/03/2019 – GST