Board
Clarification on GST Refunds
· The issue has been examined and it has
been decided to remove the restriction on clubbing of tax periods across
Financial Years. Accordingly, circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019
stands modified to that extent i.e. the restriction on bunching of refund
claims across financial years shall not apply.
· It is hereby clarified that refund of
accumulated ITC under clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST
Act would not be applicable in cases where the input and the output supplies
are the same.
· The combined effect the abovementioned
changes is that any such refund of tax paid on supplies other than zero rated
supplies will now be admissible proportionately in the respective original mode
of payment i.e. in cases of refund, where the tax to be refunded has been paid
by debiting both electronic cash and credit ledgers (other than the refund of
tax paid on zero-rated supplies or deemed export), the refund to be paid in
cash and credit shall be calculated in the same proportion in which the cash
and credit ledger has been debited for discharging the total tax liability for
the relevant period for which application for refund has been filed. Such
amount, shall be accordingly paid by issuance of order in FORM GST RFD-06 for
amount refundable in cash and FORM GST PMT-03 to re-credit the amount
attributable to credit as ITC in the electronic credit ledger.
· The matter has been examined and it has
been decided that the refund of accumulated ITC shall be restricted to the ITC
as per those invoices, the details of which are uploaded by the supplier in FORM
GSTR-1 and are reflected in the FORM GSTR-2A of the applicant.
Accordingly, para 36 of the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019
stands modified to that extent.
· New
Requirement to mention HSN/SAC in Annexure ‘B’
· The issue has been examined and
considering that such a distinction is important in view of the provisions
relating to refund where refund of credit on Capital goods and/or services is
not permissible in certain cases, it has been decided to amend the said
statement. Accordingly, Annexure-B of the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST,
dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that extent.
[GST
Circular No. 135 dated 31st March 2020]
Subject:
Clarification on refund related issues.
Various
representations have been received seeking clarification on some of the issues
relating to GST refunds. In order to clarify these issues and to ensure
uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law in this regard across
the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section
168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred
to as “CGST Act”), hereby clarifies the issues detailed hereunder:
2.
Bunching of refund claims across Financial Years
2.1
It may be recalled that the restriction on clubbing of tax periods across
different financial years was put in vide para 11.2 of the Circular No.
37/11/2018-GST dated 15.03.2018. The said circular was rescinded being subsumed
in the Master Circular on Refunds No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 and the
said restriction on the clubbing of tax periods across financial years for
claiming refund thus has been continued vide Paragraph 8 of the Circular No.
125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, which is reproduced as under:
“8.
The applicant, at his option, may file a refund claim for a tax period or by
clubbing successive tax periods. The period for which refund claim has been
filed, however, cannot spread across different financial years. Registered
persons having aggregate turnover of up to Rs. 1.5
crore in the preceding financial year or the current financial year opting to
file FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis, can only apply for refund on a
quarterly basis or clubbing successive quarters as aforesaid. However, refund
claims under categories listed at (a), (c) and (e) in para 3 above must be
filed by the applicant chronologically. This means that an applicant, after
submitting a refund application under any of these categories for a certain
period, shall not be subsequently allowed to file a refund claim under the same
category for any previous period. This principle / limitation, however, shall
not apply in cases where a fresh application is being filed pursuant to a
deficiency memo having been issued earlier.”
2.2
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Order dated 21.01.2020, in the case of M/s Pitambra Books Pvt Ltd., vide
para 13 of the said order has stayed the rigour of
paragraph 8 of Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 and has also
directed the Government to either open the online portal so as to enable the
petitioner to file the tax refund electronically, or to accept the same
manually within 4 weeks from the Order. Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide para 12
of the aforesaid Order has observed that the Circulars can supplant but not
supplement the law. Circulars might mitigate rigours
of law by granting administrative relief beyond relevant provisions of the
statute, however, Central Government is not empowered to withdraw benefits or
impose stricter conditions than postulated by the law.
2.3
Further, same issue has been raised in various other representations also,
especially those received from the merchant exporters wherein merchant
exporters have received the supplies of goods in the last quarter of a
Financial Year and have made exports in the next Financial Year i.e. from April
onwards. The restriction imposed vide para 8 of the master refund circular
prohibits the refund of ITC accrued in such cases as well.
2.4
On perusal of the provisions under sub-section (3) of section 16 of the
Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (3) of section 54
of the CGST Act, there appears no bar in claiming refund by clubbing different
months across successive Financial Years.
2.5
The issue has been examined and it has been decided to remove the restriction
on clubbing of tax periods across Financial Years. Accordingly, circular No.
125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that extent i.e. the
restriction on bunching of refund claims across financial years shall not
apply.
3.
Refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) on account of reduction in GST
Rate
3.1
It has been brought to the notice of the Board that some of the applicants are
seeking refund of unutilized ITC on account of inverted duty structure where
the inversion is due to change in the GST rate on the same goods. This can be
explained through an illustration. An applicant trading in goods has purchased,
say goods “X” attracting 18% GST. However, subsequently, the rate of GST on “X”
has been reduced to, say 12%. It is being claimed that accumulation of ITC in
such a case is also covered as accumulation on account of inverted duty
structure and such applicants have sought refund of accumulated ITC under
clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act.
3.2
It may be noted that refund of accumulated ITC in terms clause (ii) of
sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act is available where the credit has
accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of
tax on output supplies. It is noteworthy that, the input and output being the
same in such cases, though attracting different tax rates at different points
in time, do not get covered under the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section
(3) of section 54 of the CGST Act. It is hereby clarified that refund of
accumulated ITC under clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST
Act would not be applicable in cases where the input and the output supplies
are the same.
4.
Change in manner of refund of tax paid on supplies other than zero rated
supplies
4.1
Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, in para 3, categorizes the
refund applications to be filed in FORM GST RFD-01 as under:
a.
Refund of unutilized input tax credit (ITC) on account of exports without
payment of
tax;
b.
Refund of tax paid on export of services with payment of tax;
c.
Refund of unutilized ITC on account of supplies made to SEZ Unit/SEZ Developer
without
payment of tax;
d.
Refund of tax paid on supplies made to SEZ Unit/SEZ Developer with payment of
tax;
e.
Refund of unutilized ITC on account of accumulation due to inverted tax
structure;
f.
Refund to supplier of tax paid on deemed export supplies;
g.
Refund to recipient of tax paid on deemed export supplies;
h.
Refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger;
i. Refund of excess payment
of tax;
j.
Refund of tax paid on intra-State supply which is subsequently held to be
inter-State supply and vice versa;
k.
Refund on account of assessment/provisional assessment/appeal/any other order;
l.
Refund on account of “any other” ground or reason.
4.2
For the refund of tax paid falling in categories specified at S. No. (i) to (l) above i.e. refund claims on supplies other than
zero rated supplies, no separate debit of ITC from electronic credit ledger is
required to be made by the applicant at the time of filing refund claim, being
claim of tax already paid. However, the total tax would have been normally paid
by the applicant by debiting tax amount from both electronic credit ledger and
electronic cash ledger. At present, in these cases, the amount of admissible
refund, is paid in cash even when such payment of tax or any part thereof, has been
made through ITC.
4.3.1
As this could lead to allowing unintended encashment of credit balances, this
issue has been engaging attention of the Government. Accordingly, vide
notification No.16/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020, sub-rule (4A) has been inserted
in rule 86 of the CGST Rules, 2017 which reads as under:
“(4A)
Where a registered person has claimed refund of any amount paid as tax wrongly
paid or paid in excess for which debit has been made from the electronic credit
ledger, the said amount, if found admissible, shall be re-credited to the
electronic credit ledger by the proper officer by an order made in FORM GST
PMT-03.”
4.3.2
Further, vide the same notification, sub-rule (1A) has also been inserted in
rule 92 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The same is reproduced hereunder:
“(1A)Where,
upon examination of the application of refund of any amount paid as tax other
than the refund of tax paid on zero-rated supplies or deemed export, the proper
officer is satisfied that a refund under sub-section (5) of section 54 of the
Act is due and payable to the applicant, he shall make an order in FORM
RFD-06 sanctioning the amount of refund to be paid, in cash, proportionate
to the amount debited in cash against the total amount paid for discharging tax
liability for the relevant period, mentioning therein the amount adjusted
against any outstanding demand under the Act or under any existing law and the
balance amount refundable and for the remaining amount which has been debited
from the electronic credit ledger for making payment of such tax, the proper
officer shall issue FORM GST PMT-03 re-crediting the said amount as
Input Tax Credit in electronic credit ledger.”
4.4
The combined effect the abovementioned changes is that any such refund of tax
paid on supplies other than zero rated supplies will now be admissible
proportionately in the respective original mode of payment i.e. in cases of
refund, where the tax to be refunded has been paid by debiting both electronic
cash and credit ledgers (other than the refund of tax paid on zero-rated
supplies or deemed export), the refund to be paid in cash and credit shall be
calculated in the same proportion in which the cash and credit ledger has been
debited for discharging the total tax liability for the relevant period for
which application for refund has been filed. Such amount, shall be accordingly
paid by issuance of order in FORM GST RFD-06 for amount refundable in
cash and FORM GST PMT-03 to re-credit the amount attributable to credit
as ITC in the electronic credit ledger.
5.
Guidelines for refunds of Input Tax Credit under Section 54(3)
5.1
In terms of para 36 of circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, the
refund of ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in FORM GSTR-2A was
also admissible and copies of such invoices were required to be uploaded.
However, in wake of insertion of sub-rule (4) to rule 36 of the CGST Rules,
2017 vide notification No. 49/2019-GST dated 09.10.2019, various references
have been received from the field formations regarding admissibility of refund
of the ITC availed on the invoices which are not reflecting in the FORM
GSTR-2A of the applicant.
5.2
The matter has been examined and it has been decided that the refund of
accumulated ITC shall be restricted to the ITC as per those invoices, the
details of which are uploaded by the supplier in FORM GSTR-1 and are
reflected in the FORM GSTR-2A of the applicant. Accordingly, para 36 of
the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that
extent.
6. New
Requirement to mention HSN/SAC in Annexure ‘B’
6.1
References have also been received from the field formations that HSN wise
details of goods and services are not available in FORM GSTR-2A and
therefore it becomes very difficult to distinguish ITC on capital goods and/or
input services out of total ITC for a relevant tax period. It has been
recommended that a column relating to HSN/SAC Code should be added in the
statement of invoices relating to inward supply as provided in Annexure–B of
the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 so as to easily identify
between the supplies of goods and services.
6.2
The issue has been examined and considering that such a distinction is
important in view of the provisions relating to refund where refund of credit
on Capital goods and/or services is not permissible in certain cases, it has
been decided to amend the said statement. Accordingly, Annexure-B of the
circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that extent.
6.3
A suitably modified statement format is attached for applicants to upload the
details of invoices reflecting in their FORM GSTR-2A. The applicant is,
in addition to details already prescribed, now required to mention HSN/SAC code
which is mentioned on the inward invoices. In cases where supplier is not
mandated to mention HSN/SAC code on invoice, the applicant need not mention
HSN/SAC code in respect of such an inward supply.
7.
It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the
contents of this circular.
8.
Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to
the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.