Export of Services-under Sec. 2(6)(v) of IGST Act 2017
· Movement
from India Subsidiary to Principal Outside India will be Treated as Export
[Circular No. 161/17/2021-GST | Dated the 20th September, 2021]
Subject: Clarification relating to export of services-condition
(v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act 2017.
Various representations have been received citing ambiguity caused in interpretation
of the Explanation 1 under section 8 of the IGST Act 2017 in relation to condition
(v) of export of services as mentioned in sub-section (6) of the section 2 of the
IGST Act 2017. Doubts have been raised whether the supply of service by a subsidiary/
sister concern/ group concern, etc. of a foreign company in India, which is incorporated
under the laws in India, to the foreign company incorporated under laws of a country
outside India, will hit by condition (v) of subsection (6) of section 2 of IGST
Act.
2. The matter has been examined. In view of the difficulties being faced
by the trade and industry and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the
provisions of the law across field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers
conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”), hereby clarifies
the issue in succeeding paragraphs.
Relevant legal provisions:
3.1 The export of services has been defined in sub-section (6) of the section
2 of the IGST Act 2017 as under:
(6) “export of services”
means the supply of any service when,—
(i) the supplier of service
is located in India;
(ii) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(iii) the place of supply of service is outside India;
(iv) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier
of service in convertible foreign exchange; and
(v) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not
merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section
8;
3.2 Explanation 1 of the Section 8 of the IGST Act provides for the conditions
wherein establishments of a person would be treated as establishments of distinct
persons, which is reproduced as under:
Explanation I.—For the purposes of this Act, where a person has,—
(i)
an establishment in India and any other establishment
outside India;
(ii) an establishment
in a State or Union territory and any other establishment outside that State or
Union territory; or
(iii) an establishment in a State or Union territory and any other
establishment being a business vertical registered within that State or Union territory,
then such establishments shall be treated as establishments of distinct persons.
As per the above Explanation, an establishment of a person in India and another
establishment of the said person outside India are considered as establishments
of distinct persons.
3.3 Reference is also invited to the Explanation 2 of Section 8 of IGST Act,
which is reproduced below:
“Explanation 2.—A person carrying on a business
through a branch or an agency or a representational office in any territory shall
be treated as having an establishment in that territory.”
3.4 Reference is also invited to the definition of “person” as provided under
CGST Act 2017, made applicable to IGST Act vide section 2(24) of IGST Act 2017.
“Person” has been defined under sub-section (84) of the section 2 of the CGST Act
2017, as under:
(84) “person” includes
(a) an individual;
(b) a Hindu Undivided Family;
(c) a company;
(d) a firm;
(e) a Limited Liability Partnership;
(f) an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated
or not, in India or outside India;
(g) any corporation
established by or under any Central Act, State Act or Provincial Act or a Government
company as defined in clause (45) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013;
(h) any body corporate incorporated by
or under the laws of a country outside India;
(i) a co-operative society
registered under any law relating to co-operative societies;
(j) a local authority;
(k) Central
Government or a State Government;
(l) society as defined under the Societies Registration Act, 1860;
(m) trust; and
(n) every artificial juridical person, not falling within any of
the above;
3.5. The definitions of company and foreign company have been provided under
section 2 of Companies Act 2013, as under:
(20) “company” means a company incorporated under
this Act or under any previous company law;
(42) ‘foreign company” means any company or body corporate incorporated outside
India which
(a) has a place of business in India whether by
itself or through an agent, physically or through electronic mode; and
(b) conducts any business activity in India in any
other manner.
Analysis of the issue:
4.1 Clause (v) of sub-section (6) of section 2 of IGST Act, which defines
“export of services”, places a condition that the services provided by one establishment
of a person to another establishment of the same person, considered as establishments
of distinct persons as per Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act, cannot be
treated as export. In other words, any supply of services by an establishment of
a foreign company in India to any other establishment of the said foreign company
outside India will not be covered under definition of export of services.
4.2 Further, perusal of the Explanation 2 to section 8 of the IGST Act suggests
that if a foreign company is conducting business in India through a branch or an
agency or a representational office, then the said branch or agency or representational
office of the foreign company, located in India, shall be treated as establishment
of the said foreign company in India. Similarly, if any company incorporated in
India, is operating through a branch or an agency or a representational office in
any country outside India, then that branch or agency or representational office
shall be treated as the establishment of the said company in the said country.
4.3. In view of the above, it can be stated that supply of services made
by a branch or an agency or representational office of a foreign company, not incorporated
in India, to any establishment of the said foreign company outside India, shall
be treated as supply between establishments of distinct persons and shall not be
considered as “export of services” in view of condition (v) of sub-section (6) of
section 2 of IGST Act. Similarly, any supply of service by a company incorporated
in India to its branch or agency or representational office, located in any other
country and not incorporated under the laws of the said country, shall also be considered
as supply between establishments of distinct persons and cannot be treated as export
of services.
4.4 From the perusal of the definition of “person” under sub-section (84)
of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the definitions of “company” and “foreign
company” under Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, it is observed that a company
incorporated in India and a foreign company incorporated outside India, are separate
“person” under the provisions of CGST Act and accordingly, are separate legal entities.
Thus, a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group concern of any foreign company which is
incorporated in India, then the said company incorporated in India will be considered
as a separate “person” under the provisions of CGST Act and accordingly, would be
considered as a separate legal entity than the foreign company.
Clarification:
5.1 In view of the above, it is clarified that a company incorporated in
India and a body corporate incorporated by or under the laws of a country outside
India, which is also referred to as foreign company under Companies Act, are separate
persons under CGST Act, and thus are separate legal entities. Accordingly,
these two separate persons would not be considered as “merely establishments of
a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8”.
5.2 Therefore, supply of services by a subsidiary/ sister concern/ group
concern, etc. of a foreign company, which is incorporated in India under the Companies
Act, 2013 (and thus qualifies as a ‘company’ in India as per Companies Act), to
the establishments of the said foreign company located outside India (incorporated
outside India), would not be barred by the condition (v) of the sub-section (6)
of the section 2 of the IGST Act 2017 for being considered as export of services,
as it would not be treated as supply between merely establishments of distinct persons
under Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act 2017 . Similarly, the supply from a
company incorporated in India to its related establishments outside India, which
are incorporated under the laws outside India, would not be treated as supply to
merely establishments of distinct person under Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST
Act 2017. Such supplies, therefore, would qualify as ‘export of services’, subject
to fulfilment of other conditions as provided under sub-section (6) of section 2
of IGST Act.
6. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize
the contents of this Circular.
7. Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of this Circular may be brought
to the notice of the Board. Hindi version will follow.
F.No. CBIC-20001/8/2021–GST