Board Crack Down on Sub Contracting by Cargo Service Providers –
Commissioner Permission Must
[CBEC
Circular No. 45 dated 31st December 2013]
Attention
is invited to Regulation 6(2) of the “Handling of Cargo in Customs Area
Regulations, (HCCAR) 2009” which stipulates the following requirement:
“The Customs Cargo Service
provider approved for custody of imported or export goods and for handling of
such goods shall not lease, gift, sell or sublet or in any other manner
transfer any of the premises in a customs area; or sub contract or outsource
functions permitted or required to be carried out by him in terms of these
regulations to any other person, without the written permission of the
Commissioner of Customs.”
2. Instances
have come to notice of the Board where Customs Cargo Service Providers (CCSPs)
have sub-contracted operations relating to handling of import/export cargo
without written permission of the jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs. This has led to situation where cargo
integrity at times has been compromised by such operators to whom the services
were sub contracted by CCSP without getting prior approval from jurisdictional
Commissioner of Customs. In a particular case one such unapproved operator to
whom the CCSP had sub-contracted the work of transportation of export goods was
found to be complicit in substitution of the export goods with goods prohibited
for export.
3. To
obviate these situations, Board re-iterates that under no circumstances, CCSPs
approved for custody of imported or export goods and for handling of such goods
shall lease, gift, sell or sublet or in any other manner transfer any of the
premises in a customs area; or sub contract or outsource functions permitted or
required to be carried out by him in terms of these regulationswithout written approval of the
jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs. Board also desires
jurisdictional Commissioners of Customs to review immediately the conditions
and obligations required to be fulfilled by CCSP under HCCAR, 2009 and promptly
initiate remedial action in case non compliance is noticed.
4. All
cases of violation of regulation 6(2) shall be dealt with sternly according to
law and the violators shall be punished.
5. Difficulty
faced, if any, may be brought to the notice of the Board.
F.NO.
450/160/2013- Cus IV