Verification of Brand Rate System Dispensed, CA Certificate
Sufficient in Normal Cases
[Ref: CBEC Circular 54/2006-Customs dated 22
November 2016]
Subject: Further rationalization of revised
simplified procedure for fixation of brand rates
It has been brought to notice of Board that the
requirement of original duty paying documents furnished with reference to the
claim of drawback being endorsed (defaced) by the verifying officer with the
extent of utilization for the brand rate application is a cause of delay in
disposal of applications as it is a tedious and time consuming activity in
which officers replicate the efforts of the applicant and many times involves
voluminous documentation being produced by applicant at the government office.
The Board examined the matter in consultation with a few field formations.
2. Keeping in view that the use of DBK Statements II
and III certified by independent Chartered Accountant/Cost Accountant is
already in vogue in the revised simplified brand rate scheme (available to 5
categories of exporters in terms of Member (Customs) D.O. letter No.
609/110/2005- DBK dated 26.8.2005), the Board has decided to further rationalize
the revised simplified procedure as follows-
(a) The
working sheet (submitted by applicant with brand rate fixation claim) showing
the drawback amount, each document wise, in support of claim, shall bear-
(i) a declaration signed by applicant “It is
declared that the details in this working sheet are correct and original duty
paid documents shown herein have been endorsed/defaced to the extent of
utilization under this brand rate fixation claim”, and
(ii) a
certificate from an independent Cost Accountant/Chartered Accountant “It is
verified that the details in this working sheet are correct and that the
original duty paid documents shown herein have been endorsed/defaced to the
extent of utilization under this brand rate fixation claim by the applicant”;
and
(b) Applicant
shall file self-attested copies of the duty paid documents (like bills of
entry, invoice etc.) carrying their self-endorsement/defacement to the extent
of utilization under the brand rate fixation claim.
3. Based on the above,-
(l) in future applications made under the revised simplified
brand rate scheme the requirement of submitting original duty paying documents
for endorsing/defacement by verifying officer during post-facto checking stage
shall be dispensed except to the extent of random cross-verification of not
more than 5 per cent originals of the self-attested copies of the total duty
paid documents. The random selection shall be based on dynamic and relevant
risk parameters as indicated by the Commissioner;
(ll) with respect to existing applications under the
revised simplified brand rate scheme where brand rate letter is not yet issued
or where it has been issued but post-facto verification is pending, the
applicant may choose either to -
(a) continue with the extant procedures; or
(b) have the
requirement of submitting original duty paying documents dispensed (subject to
random cross-verification of originals) provided they self-endorse/deface the
duty paid documents to the extent of utilization under the brand rate fixation
and resubmit the working sheet with the above cited declaration and
certificate.
4. Suitable
trade notice and standing orders should be issued.
F.No.609/84/2016-DBK