Any ‘Further
Decision’ on RCEP can be taken only if other Members Address our Concerns, says
MEA
After announcing earlier this week
that India had exited the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
pact, the Ministry of External Affairs has now said that if the country gets a
firm indication that its core concerns would get addressed by other members, it
could consider taking a further decision on the matter.
“I think our concerns and requests
are available with other members of the RCEP. We have said that we have
negotiated with a very clear view of our interests. If we get a firm indication
that our core interests will be accommodated, at that stage we can think of
taking any further decision on this matter,” MEA spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said answering a question at a briefing on
Thursday.
After the RCEP Leaders Summit,
attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Bangkok on Monday, the MEA
Secretary (East) addressed a media briefing where she said that India had
decided to exit the RCEP as the country’s core concerns remained unaddressed.
The joint statement issued at the end
of the Summit, however, stated that all RCEP participating countries will work
together to resolve India’s outstanding issues in a mutually satisfactory way
and the country’s final decision will depend on satisfactory resolution of
these issues.
Interestingly, New Zealand’s Minister
of State for Trade Damien O’Connor, who visited India this week, also said that
the 15 RCEP countries had agreed to work with India on its sensitivities before
the final agreement.
But there is yet no clarity on how
the other RCEP members would negotiate with India on its remaining concerns.
Addressing the media on Tuesday,
Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal identified some of the problems that India had with
the proposed RCEP pact in its current shape. An important concern was the
‘rules of origin’ (ROO) which determine how much value should be added to an
item in the last country from where it is exported. India wants strict ROO to
ensure that Chinese goods, with higher duties, do not enter India’s markets
through other member countries where the tariffs may be lower.
India is also demanding that the base
rate of duty (for calculating tariff cuts) should be 2019 instead of 2014 as
those rates were not relevant any more.
Additionally, India is demanding that
an adequate Auto Trigger Safeguard Mechanism should be put in place to prevent
dumping of cheap imports and import surges. The country also does not want to
accept ‘ratchet’ obligation in the investment chapter that would stop it from
changing its existing rules.