Apple for Sales
Ban on Samsung Galaxy Smart Phones Series
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is again seeking to ban sales in
the U.S. of Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) products that were at issue in the
companies’ first patent trial in California and are now no longer on the market.
The iPhone-maker on 26 Dec asked U.S. District
Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, to bar sales
of more than 20 smartphones and tablets, such as the Galaxy S 4G and Galaxy Tab
10.1, that a jury last year found to infringe Apple’s
patents. While Koh rejected Apple’s bid for a sales
ban on the infringing Samsung devices after the 2012 verdict, a federal appeals
court on Nov. 18 cleared the way for the iPhone maker to pursue an injunction
targeting some of its rival’s products.
“Samsung’s claim that it has discontinued selling
the particular models found to infringe or design around Apple’s patents in no
way diminishes Apple’s need for injunctive relief,” Apple argued in 26 Dec
filing. “Because Samsung frequently brings new products to market, an
injunction is important to providing Apple the relief it needs to combat any
future infringement by Samsung through products not more than colorably different from those already found to infringe.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
in Washington said that Apple could tailor its request to focus on infringement
of patents covering smartphone features, such as multitouch
technology, that were at issue in the 2012 trial. The company can’t block
Samsung products for infringing patented designs, according to the opinion.
The world’s top two smartphone makers have spent
hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees on claims of copying each other’s
features in a global battle to dominate the market. Apple, which initiated the
legal fight in 2011, had 13 percent market share in
the third quarter of this year, while Samsung had 31 percent,
according to IDC, a research firm based in Framingham, Massachusetts.
Damages
Trial
Last month, Apple won more than $290 million from
Samsung in a do-over damages trial stemming from the same case in which Apple
is seeking its sales ban request. A jury restored most of the $410.5 million Koh cut from the $1.05 billion 2012 verdict after finding
it was flawed because jurors in the first trial miscalculated the period that
the infringement occurred. Total damages owed by Samsung now stand at $930
million.
Apple, based in Cupertino, California, has another
case against Samsung going to trial in March over newer models, including
Samsung’s Galaxy S III. Should Koh, who is presiding
over the case, impose a ban on the older models, Apple could argue that newer phones
are the same products up with new names.
The lower court case is Apple Inc. v. Samsung
Electronics Co. Ltd., 11-cv-01846, U.S. District Court, Northern District of
California (San Jose). The appeals court case is Apple Inc. v. Samsung
Electronics Co., 13-1129, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(Washington).