Australia
Tries to Break Its Dependence on China for Lithium Mining
Half of
the world’s supply of the critical battery ingredient is mined in Australia,
which ships virtually all of it to China. The government and business are
betting they can change that.
Deep in rural Western Australia,
Pilbara Minerals’ vast processing plant looms above the red dirt, quivering as tons
of a lithium ore slurry move through its pipes.
The plant turns the ore from
a nearby quarry into spodumene, a greenish crystalline powder that is about 6 percent
lithium and sells for about $5,700 a ton. From there, the spodumene is shipped to
China, where it is further refined so it can be used in the batteries that power
goods like cellphones and electric cars.
Australia mines about 53 percent
of the world’s supply of lithium, and virtually all of it is sold to China. But
now the Australian government wants to break the world’s dependence on China for
processing the minerals driving the green revolution.
Pilbara Minerals, the country’s
largest independent lithium miner, is among the companies exploring a new model
for producing battery chemicals — done closer to where the lithium is mined and
sold to allies like the United States and South Korea.
The challenges of getting such
an industry underway are daunting. China has an enormous head start, with years
of experience and hundreds of lithium refining plants, and a steadily tightening
grip on the world’s battery-making facilities. Australia’s more rigorous workplace
standards will also make it harder to compete with China on price, analysts said,
even as some in Australia have argued that they will result in a more trustworthy,
premium product.
“Consumers will vote using their
feet, and they will buy electric vehicles, or even solar panels at home, based on
the costs,” said Marina Zhang, a researcher at the Australia-China Relations Institute
at the University of Technology Sydney.
Pilbara Minerals is working with
the Australian tech company Calix on a project to refine spodumene to a lithium
phosphate salt — a key step in readying the material used in batteries. The companies
are expected to make a final decision by the end of the year whether to invest up
to 70 million Australian dollars, or around $47 million, to build a demonstration
plant.
Dale Henderson, the chief executive
of Pilbara Minerals, and other proponents have argued that refining lithium at home
would create jobs, reduce the impact of shipping — 94 percent of shipped spodumene
is thrown out as waste — and secure supply chains for battery chemicals amid rising
geopolitical tensions.
Refining lithium would also allow
Australia to tap into the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden administration policy
enacted last year. The law aims to cut into China’s green energy dominance by offering
loans or subsidies to companies in countries, like Australia, that have free trade
agreements with the United States.
At the Group of 7 summit last
weekend, President Biden and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia jointly
announced projects intended to strengthen the supply chain for “critical minerals”
used in clean energy.
The Australian government has
already put hundreds of millions of dollars toward supporting the lithium refining
industry, betting that customers will seek out lithium supply from a country that
is more environmentally friendly and has a strong rule of law.
“If you have more of the supply
chain in a country which has very strong governance, and a very, very safe and trustworthy
business environment, then consumers can have more confidence in the products that
they buy,” said Allison Britt, a director at Geoscience Australia, a government
agency.
A government report forecast that 20 percent of global
lithium refining could take place in Australia by 2027, up from less than 1
percent currently.
But Australia would have to make
significant strides to get closer to China in refining.
So far, Australia has just two
facilities to produce battery-grade lithium hydroxide, used to make cathodes, with
a third under construction. All have suffered from major construction delays related
to labor shortages, as well as cost overruns.
The largest facility, co-owned
by the American chemical maker Albemarle and the Australian miner Mineral Resources,
is being expanded with the goal of becoming “one of the world’s largest lithium
production facilities,” according to a statement from Albemarle. Last year it produced
its first battery-grade lithium hydroxide — more than a year behind schedule.
“Historically, Australia has
shipped unprocessed ore to other countries to process,” he said. “That change in
mind-set, I think, is going to be tricky.”
Chris Ellison, the owner of Mineral
Resources, said the government must make it easier for foreign companies to invest
in Australian lithium refining through incentives like funding and tax breaks.
“They are being offered grants
to build in Europe, the U.S. and places like Vietnam from the American government,”
he said in a presentation to investors in February. “We need the Australian government
to come to the party on that.”
The Australian government must
also weigh acute geopolitical concerns. Lithium is instrumental to the country’s
relationship with China, said Corey Lee Bell, of the Australia-China Relations Institute
at the University of Technology Sydney.
“If we were to cut that supply,
I think it would be a very, very big issue,” Dr. Bell
said.
Yet Australia has hinted that
it might be comfortable doing just that.
Speaking last month, Madeleine
King, Australia’s resources minister, said the country had an important role to
play in pushing back against the “concentration” of critical minerals industries
in China, which she said led to “fragility, volatility and unreliability.” The government
has also indicated that it might limit foreign ownership of critical mineral resources.
In 2020, previously cordial relations
between Australia and China took a turn after Scott Morrison, then the prime minister,
ordered an inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic. China then blocked
some Australian imports, including coal and wine. Australia escalated the dispute
to the World Trade Organization and revoked the state of Victoria’s participation
in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
There have been signs in recent
months that the tensions are cooling. China announced last week that it would lift
its suspension of Australian timber imports after ending an unofficial embargo on
Australian coal.
But the relationship remains
volatile. Australia “needs to have a little bit more of a say over the destiny of
its resources,” said Ross Gregory, a partner at New Electric Partners, an advisory
firm.
Despite the barriers, Australia’s
control of the raw material gives it a chance to assert influence further down the
supply chain, said Joe Lowry, the founder of the advisory firm Global Lithium.
“The guy with the rock wins,”
Mr. Lowry said. “And Australia’s got the rock.”