Biodiesel War between EU and Argentina Reaches WTO Panel

The dispute (DS473) between Argentina and the EU over the latter’s imposition of anti-dumping duties on biodiesel imports from the South American economy has advanced to the panel stage, after Buenos Aires presented its second panel request to the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body last Friday, 25 April.

The duties in question were confirmed by the 28-member bloc last November, following a European Commission investigation into claims that Argentina and Indonesia – the world’s top exporters of biofuels – were selling their energy product to EU member states below its normal value, a practice known as “dumping” in trade parlance.

Notably, third parties expressing interest in the WTO case do not currently include Indonesia, on whom Brussels has also imposed biodiesel anti-dumping duties.

Friday’s development came within days of Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner forwarding a request to Congress to eliminate certain domestic taxes paid by biodiesel manufacturers, slated as an effort to support the country’s industry in the face of the EU measures. The proposal suggested the tax concessions would run as long as the duties remained in place. “We are in a trade war,” she said when outlining the policy shift last week.

Argentina and Indonesia together make up 90 percent of the EU’s biodiesel imports and capture over one-fifth of the bloc’s market share. Brussels alleges that the duties – which see Argentine biodiesel producers having to pay between €217 and €246 per metric tonne, according to local media reports from last autumn – are necessary to level the playing field for its own domestic producers.

For its part, Argentina has lodged two separate cases before the global trade arbiter. In a case (DS443) put forward in 2012, Buenos Aires objected to Spain’s decision to implement a part of the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive by favouring biofuels produced within the trading bloc.

Although Argentina opted to put that dispute on hold following Spain’s modification of the rules involved, another hit came in May 2013, when the country filed a separate complaint (DS459) in relation to EU support schemes offered to the domestic biodiesel sector.