Aluminium Dross and Skimmings are Manufactured Goods and
Excisable
· Revenue
Follow Tribunal Judgement
[CBEC Instruction F. No. 17/02/2009-CX.1 (Pt)
dated 12th November 2014]
Subject - Judgment of the Larger Bench of Tribunal on
Aluminum dross and skimming.
I am directed to bring judgment of Hon’ble
Tribunal [Larger Bench] in case of M/s Hindalco
Industries Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur, Mumbai - III and Nagpur
[2014-TIOL-1762-CESTAT-Mum-LB]. In this case an important question of law was
framed and answered. The reference made to the Larger Bench as defined in
paragraph 1 and the answer to the reference as given in paragraph 7 of the
judgment is reproduced below for ease of reference.
2. “The reference made to the Larger Bench
reads as follows:
(a) Whether Aluminium
Dross and Skimmings or similar Non-ferrous Metal
Dross and Skimmings, which arise in the process of
manufacture of aluminium / Non-ferrous metal products
can be considered as a ‘manufactured goods' and hence excisable for the period
post 10.05.2008 in view of the Explanation added to Section 2(d) of the Central
Excise Act, 1944?
Or
(b) Notwithstanding the Explanation to Section
2(d), Aluminium Dross Skimmings
or other Non-ferrous metal dross and Skimmings cannot
be considered as ‘manufactured products' and hence, not liable to excise duty?
”
3. “In the factual and legal matrix discussed
above, we answer the reference made to us as follows:-
Aluminium dross and skimmings and similar non-ferrous
metal dross and skimmings which arise as a by-product
in the process of manufacture of aluminium /
non-ferrous metal products are manufactured goods and hence excisable w.e.f. 10.05.2008 in view of the explanation added to
Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.”
4. This is an important judgment and sets out the
correct legal position in the matter. Field officers are directed to follow the
same in cases covered by similar facts. Difficulty if any in implementing this
instruction may be brought to the notice of the Board.