No Higher DBK at Shipping Stage without No Cenvat
Certificate, says Rev Dir
[CBEC Instruction
dated 13th March 2014]
Subject: Drawback
shipping bill in which the higher composite All Industry Rate applicable when Cenvat facility has not been availed is claimed – Processing
at the time of export.
Under the extant
procedure in EDI, where the exporter files a shipping bill for export under
claim for duty drawback and shows the claim for the higher composite rate that
features in Column (A) of the AIR Drawback Schedule, the requirement of a “Non-Availment of Cenvat Certificate”
appears at the time of export in the list of documents in EDI System. Only when
it is recorded that this certificate is available, the shipping bill moves to
Let Export Order (LEO) stage. When the shipping bill does not move to the LEO
stage, the exporter or his agent has to amend the shipping bill to show claim
for the lower rate of AIR duty drawback in column (B) of the Schedule. Upon
such amendment, the shipping bill moves to the LEO stage without requirement of
the certificate. This does not prevent the exporter from subsequently claiming
higher drawback by following due procedure.
2. While replying to the Hon’ble
Public Accounts Committee in a matter related to the Audit Report
No.15/2011-12, Section 2 (Duty Drawback Scheme) it has come to notice that in
certain cases the amendment of the shipping bill was avoided even though the
necessary certificate for claiming the higher AIR was not available at the time
of export. The practice in such cases was to show, in the EDI System document
menu, that the certificate is available, and simultaneously record contrary
remarks in the ‘departmental comments’ that certificate should be
verified subsequently. Intent behind such remarks was that the certificate be
seen at the time of drawback processing. However, instances were noticed where
drawback was processed at the higher rate based on the details recorded in the
EDI system rather than in the departmental comments. Such a practice
is not in harmony with the EDI’s system-based checks and balances and places
revenue at risk. The Board directs that such a practice should be strictly
avoided and field formations should ensure that the prescribed procedure is
scrupulously followed at the time of export.
F.No.609/156/2013-DBK