National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) Leviable on Central Excise and Customs Duty Exemption
[CBIC
Instruction dated 9 January 2020]
Sub:
Judgement dated 06.12.2019 passed by Hon’bl e Supreme
Court in Civil Appeal No . 9237/2019 in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries
v. Union of India
The
undersigned has been directed to refer to the subject judgment, wherein the
Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD),
education cess and secondary & higher education cess would be leviable even if
the Central Excise duty or Customs duty was exempted. Thus, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court has declared the judgment in the case of Bajaj Auto Limited v. Union of
India, in Civil Appeal No. 3239/2019, as per
incuriam. The judgments are available on Supreme
Court website.
2.
In the case of Bajaj Auto Limited (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that
once the excise duty is exempted, NCCD, levied as an excise duty cannot partake
a different character and thus, would be entitled to the benefit of the
exemption notification. Consequently, several assessees
across the country discontinued payment of NCCD on tobacco products and started
challenging the levy of NCCD on these products as the basic excise duty on the
said products was exempted with effect from 01.07.2017. Accordingly, to sustain
the levy of NCCD on crude petroleum and tobacco products, it was decided to
levy a nominal basic excise duty on all the goods which are subject to the levy
of NCCD vide Notification No. 03/2019- Central Excise dated 06.07.2019.
3.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the subject judgment has held that in absence of
specific notification “containing an
exemption to such additional duties in nature of education cess
and secondary and higher education cess”, they
cannot be said to have been exempted. The relevant portions of the subject
judgment are reproduced hereunder:
“41…The reason employed in SRD Nutrients
Private Limited (supra) that there was nil excise duty, as such, additional
duty cannot be charged, is also equally unacceptable as additional duty can
always be determined and merely exemption granted in respect of a particular
excise duty, cannot come in the way of determination of yet another duty based
thereupon. The proposition urged that simply because one kind of duty is
exempted, other kinds of duties automatically fall, cannot be accepted as there
is no difficulty in making the computation of additional duties, which are
payable under NCCD, education cess, secondary and
higher education cess. Moreover, statutory notification
must cover specifically the duty
exempted. When a particular kind of duty is exempted, other types of duty or cess imposed by different legislation for a different
purpose cannot be said to have been exempted.
…
43. Thus, it is clear that before the
Division Bench deciding SRD Nutrients Private Limited and Bajaj Auto Limited
(supra), the previous binding decisions of three Judge Bench in Modi Rubber
(supra) and Rita Textiles Private Limited (supra) were not placed for
consideration. Thus, the decisions in SRD Nutrients Private Limited and Bajaj
Auto Limited (supra) are clearly per incuriam.”
(emphasis supplied).
4.
Accordingly, it is requested that
i) Field formations under your jurisdiction may
be directed to initiate recovery of duties, including NCCD, in cases where the assessees were not paying the same on the strength of the
previous judgments, specifically the judgment in the case of Bajaj Auto Limited
(supra). The issue has implications for GST revenue also, as NCCD forms part of
value on which GST is calculated.
ii) The subject
judgment may be brought to the notice of the Hon’ble Courts, wherein the
similar issue is pending. Any interim or final order decided against the
revenue may be contested by filing statutory appeal, writ appeal or review
petition, as the case may be, in consultation with the Standing Counsel. If the
same is not possible, a self-contained SLP proposal may be forwarded to Board,
as per extant instructions.
5.
The contents of this Instruction may also be bought to the notice of all field
formations under your jurisdiction.
F.No.276/187/2018-CX.8A
Part