Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) Moves Supreme Court
against Adani Ports SEZ
In it appeal, CWC, which is
operating a warehouse comprising of two godowns with
a total capacity of 66,000 MTs at the 34-acre plot, has chllenged
the unlawful inclusion of its land in the SEZ area.
State-run Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) has moved
the Supreme Court alleging that Adani Ports Special
Economic Zone (APSEZ) has misrepresented the authorities so as to take away its
34 acre allegedly adjacent to latter’s Mundra Port in
Gujarat.
In it appeal, CWC, which is
operating a warehouse comprising of two godowns with
a total capacity of 66,000 MTs at the 34-acre plot, has chllenged
the unlawful inclusion of its land in the SEZ area. It has challenged the
Gujarat HC Division Bench’s order that asked to CWC to obtain approval or a
waiver as a SEZ compliant unit from the competent authority in respect of its
warehouse facility situated in 34 acre in question within SEZ Area developed by
APSEZL.
In case, CWC failed to get such approval within three
months, the APSEZ was directed to acquire the land of the same size outside SEZ
area for the construction of a warehouse facility within one year. The HC had
also asked CWC to vacate and give possession of its existing warehousing
facility and the land within three months after a new alternative arrangement
was made by the APSEZ.
A Bench led by Justice BR Gavai
while seeking response from the ministry of consumer affairs, food and public
distribution, APSEZ and others asked the parties to amicably settle the issue.
Earlier attempts to amicably settle the row had failed as CWC had raised
apprehensions that the alternative plot offered by APSEZ outside the SEZ was
around 25 kms from its present godown
was unsuitable and would cause considerable loss to its business. “Any loss
from shifting to such alternative location would ultimately be borne by the
public exchequer,” it said.
Alleging that the HC has imposed “completely unreasonable
and unconscionable conditions” which are bound to cause considerable loss to
the public exchequer, CWC said that has been left at the mercy of APSEZ and the
option to apply to the Development Commissioner, APSEZ, is also likely to
result only in a paper exercise since the department of commerce had already
taken the view that there is no permissibility of denotification/partial
notification of any area from the APSEZ.
“In an entirely impermissible manner, the HC has foisted
unreasonable conditions on CWC, effectively compelling CWC to shift out of the
SEZ area, for no fault of its own and only on account of the mis-representation and unlawful application filed by APSEZ
in contravention of the SEZ Rules, 2006,” the petition stated.
“Even in other cases, similar notifications for
exclusion/deletion of parcels of land from the notified SEZ area have been
issued by the department of commerce. For instance, it had in October 2013, at
the instance of RIL,
de-notified an area of 708.13 hectares from its notified SEZ of RIL at Jamnagar
in Gujarat, the petition stated.
CWC, which has been providing its warehouse for storage
of food grains of Food Corporation of India and notified commodities such as
cotton bales purchased by Cotton Corporation of India at MSP, etc, said that the land was leased to it in June 2004 by
Gujarat Adani Ports and it had spent huge money to develop the land and its
adjoining areas.