China
Heading to falling 2% Growth Level as India, Vietnam Compete
Ballooning
debt, tepid consumption and worsening relations with the West to weigh on growth,
economists say
·
Competition for investment with countries
including India and Vietnam is heating up as firms seek to diversify supply
chains, partly in response to the risk of disruption from conflict between the
U.S. and China.
China’s era of rapid growth is
over. Its recovery from zero-Covid is stalling. And now the country is facing deep,
structural problems in its economy.
The outlook was better just a
few months ago, after Beijing lifted its draconian zero-Covid controls, setting
off a flurry of spending as people ate out and splurged on travel.
But as the sugar high of the
reopening wears off, underlying problems in China’s economy that have been building
for years are reasserting themselves.
The property boom and government
overinvestment that fueled growth for more than a decade
have ended. Enormous debts are crippling households and local governments. Some
families, worried about the future, are hoarding cash.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s crackdowns
on private enterprise have discouraged risk-taking, while deteriorating relations
with the West—exemplified by a new campaign against international due diligence
and consulting firms—are stifling foreign investment.
Economists say these worsening
structural problems are hobbling China’s chances of extending the growth miracle
that transformed it into a rival to the U.S. for global power and influence.
Instead of expanding at 6% to
8% a year as was common in the past, China may soon be heading toward growth of
only 2% or 3%, some economists say. An aging population and shrinking workforce
compound its difficulties.
China could drive less global
growth this year and beyond than many business leaders expected, making China less
important for some foreign companies, and less likely to significantly surpass the
U.S. as the world’s biggest economy.
“The disappointing recovery today
really suggests that some of the structural drags are already in play,” said Frederic
Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC.
China’s economy expanded at an
annual rate of 4.5% in the first quarter, boosted by the end of Covid-era restrictions.
Yet more recent signals suggest
the revival is ebbing. Retail sales rose just 0.5% in April compared with March.
A bundle of data on factory output, exports and investment came in much weaker than
economists were expecting.
More than a fifth of Chinese
youths aged 16 to 24 were unemployed in April. E-commerce giants Alibaba and JD.com
reported lackluster first-quarter earnings. Hong Kong’s
Hang Seng Index, dominated by Chinese companies, is down 5.2% year to date, and
the yuan has weakened against the U.S. dollar.
Most economists don’t expect
China’s problems to lead to recession, or derail the government’s growth target
of around 5% this year, which is widely seen as easily achievable given how weak
the economy was last year.
McDonald’s and Starbucks have
said they
are opening hundreds of new restaurants in China, while retailers including Ralph
Lauren are launching new stores.
A boom in electric-vehicle production
allowed China to surpass Japan as the world’s largest exporter of vehicles in the
first quarter. Beijing’s industrial policies and China’s manufacturing prowess mean
it is still finding ways to succeed in some major industries.
“We still have confidence in
the long-term growth story of China,” said Phillip Wool, head of research at Rayliant Global Advisors, an asset manager with $17 billion
under management. He said the country’s transition to one that relies more on domestic
consumption instead of exports will help keep it on track.
Still, many economists are growing
more worried about China’s future.
The big hope for this year was
that Chinese consumers would dramatically step up spending,
as the main drivers of China’s past growth—investment and exports—languish.
But while people are spending
somewhat more after almost three years of tough Covid-19 controls, China isn’t experiencing
the kind of surge other economies enjoyed when they emerged from the pandemic.
Consumer confidence is low. More
important, some economists say, is that Beijing hasn’t been able to meaningfully
change Chinese consumers’ long-running propensity to save rather than spend—a response
to a threadbare social safety net that means families must sock away more for medical
bills and other emergencies.
Chinese household consumption
accounts for around 38% of annual gross domestic product, according to United Nations
data, compared with 68% in the U.S.
“Consumer-led growth has always
been a bit of an aspirational target” for China, said Louise Loo, China lead economist in Singapore at Oxford Economics, a consulting
firm. Now, it may be even harder to achieve, she said, given how cautious Chinese
consumers are coming out of the pandemic.
Although Beijing is trying to
make it easier to borrow this year, lending data indicate households prefer to pay
down debt than take on new loans.
In March, Zi Lu dipped into her
dowry and paid off the remaining 1.2 million yuan, equivalent to about $170,000,
on her mortgage for an apartment she bought in Shanghai two years ago. Working for
an e-commerce retailer, she said sales have been underwhelming this year. Lu said
she is anxious and wants to reduce her debt burden.
“I’m scared of getting laid off
out of the blue,” she said.
Also looming over the economy
is its massive debt pile.
Between 2012 and 2022, China’s
debt grew by $37 trillion, while the U.S. added nearly $25 trillion. By June 2022,
debt in China reached about $52 trillion, dwarfing outstanding debt in all other
emerging markets combined, according to calculations by Nicholas Borst, director
of China research at Seafarer Capital Partners.
As of last September, total debt
as a share of GDP hit 295% in China, compared with 257% in the U.S., data from the
Bank for International Settlements shows.
Viewing the debt buildup as a threat to financial stability, Xi has made deleveraging a centerpiece
of his economic policy since 2016, weighing on growth.
To help deflate the country’s
housing bubble, regulators imposed strict borrowing limits for property developers
from late 2020. Property development investment fell 5.8% in the first quarter of
this year despite policy efforts to stem the pace of the slide.
Two-thirds of local governments
are now in danger of breaching unofficial debt thresholds set by Beijing to signify
severe funding stress, according to S&P Global calculations. Cities across the
country from Shenzhen to Zhengzhou have cut benefits for civil servants and delayed
salary payments in some cases for teachers.
These problems are deepening
when China’s appeal as a destination for foreign firms is waning, data show, as
tensions rise with the U.S.-led West.
Foreign direct investment into
China tumbled 48% in 2022 compared with a year earlier, to $180 billion, according
to Chinese data, while FDI as a share of China’s GDP has slipped to less than 2%,
from more than double that a decade ago.
Competition for investment with
countries including India and Vietnam is heating up as firms seek to diversify supply
chains, partly in response to the risk of disruption from conflict between the U.S.
and China.
Jens Eskelund,
president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, said that uncertainty
over China’s long-term economic prospects is another factor in companies’ investment
decisions.
“Naturally, it dampens the willingness
to go out and invest in additional capacity if you are not super optimistic about
the economic outlook,” he said.
Reforms to foster more productive,
private-sector activity have stalled under Xi, who is placing greater emphasis on
security than economic growth. Beijing has tightened regulation of sectors including
technology, private education and real estate, leaving many business owners unwilling
to invest more.
In the first four months of this
year, fixed-asset investment made by private firms grew 0.4% from a year earlier,
compared with 5.5% growth in the same period in 2019.
Chinese leaders have dialed up rhetoric to reassure entrepreneurs and investors.
Li Qiang, China’s No. 2 official and new premier, said
in March that China will open further to foreign players, and told Communist Party
officials to treat private entrepreneurs as “our own people.”
Economists are split over whether
policy makers, who have held off on launching large-scale stimulus as they did in
2008 and 2015, will resort to more aggressive stimulus now. Some, including economists
from Citigroup, expect China’s central bank to cut interest rates in the coming
months to lift sentiment.
Others say that Beijing’s restraint
stems from fear of compounding already high debt levels, and that more stimulus
might do little to trigger demand for credit anyway.
Jeff Bowman, chief executive
of Cocona, which makes temperature-regulating materials used in apparel and bedding,
said he is still optimistic about China. He said that during a recent two-week business
trip to Taiwan and China, customers who were focused on China’s domestic market
were far more upbeat than their counterparts exporting to the U.S. or Europe, who
he said “are hurting for sure.”
He said that Cocona, based in
Boulder, Colo., plans to set up a subsidiary in China to expand its business there.
But many analysts still wonder
where the growth will come from.
“The big question is, have we
reached the point where awareness of the structural slowdown is becoming a near-term
issue for confidence? Then it’s a bit of a vicious cycle,” said Michael Hirson, head of China research at 22V Research, a New York-based
consulting firm.