Data
Protection Bill: House Panel Suggests One Authority for All Data
·
Social Media to be accountable
·
Data Privacy a matter of right
A Joint
Select Committee of Parliament has recommended substantial changes to the
Personal Data Protection (PDP) Bill. The Committee on PDP legislation tabled
its report with a draft amended Bill in Parliament on Thursday. It has made 81
recommendations for modifications and the draft amended Bill has 150
corrections and improvements to various clauses of the PDP Bill.
The Bill
provides for the establishment of a Data Protection Authority (DPA) and
addresses issues arising out of the Supreme Court’s verdict establishing
privacy as a fundamental right in Justice KS Puttaswamy-versus-Union
of India. The panel also considered the recommendations and the
draft Bill of Justice Srikrishna committee. The panel
felt that all data have to be dealt with by one DPA. “Since the Bill provides
for the establishment of one Data Protection Authority, we cannot have two
DPAs, one dealing with privacy and personal data and the other with
non-personal data,” the report said.
The panel has
set a two-year deadline for the government and the data fiduciaries to make the
changes to policies, infrastructure, processes, etc.
Another major
recommendation is treating all social media platforms as publishers and be held
accountable for the content they host. The panel noted that these platforms
have the ability to select the receiver of the content and also exercise
control over the access to any such content hosted by them. “Once application
for verification is submitted with necessary documents, social media
intermediaries must mandatorily verify the account,” it said.
The panel
pressed for developing an indigenous financial system on the lines of ‘ripple’
in the US and the EU’s INSTEX. It said in the present SWIFT network, privacy
has been compromised.
It called for
preparing a policy for gradual data localisation. It
has asked the Centre to devise a single window system to deal with complaints,
penalties and compensation. It wants the government to set up a statutory body
for media regulation.
The panel
recommended that penalty provisions for data fiduciaries should be flexible as
digital technology is evolving rapidly. If a fiduciary fails to register with
the DPA or does not undertake data protection impact assessment or does not
conduct a data audit, the penalty could be ₹5 crore or two per cent of
its total worldwide turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is
higher. For processing personal data in violation of the provisions of the Bill,
or for personal data of children, or for transfer of personal data outside
India, the penalty could be ₹15 crore or four per cent of its total
worldwide turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
Head of the
government departments should not be made directly responsible for data breach,
it said. The fiduciary should report a data breach within 72 hours. Tabling the
report, panel member Jairam Ramesh said in the Rajya Sabha that the work of the Joint Select Committee is
an example of cooperation. “If the Chairman is cooperative, the Opposition is
responsive,” he said.