DoT Decides to Withdraw 96% of AGR Dues Demanded from PSUs
Next
hearing of telecom operators’ plea scheduled for July
The Centre on Thursday, 18 June 2020 told the Supreme Court
that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has decided to withdraw 96 per cent
of the ₹4-lakh crore demand for adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues raised against
non-telecom PSUs, including Power Grid Corporation of India, GAIL India, Gujarat
Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals and Oil India.
The Supreme Court last week had come down heavily on the DoT
for demanding AGR from these PSUs, terming it “totally impermissible”.
The PSUs had contested the DoT’s demand, saying telecom wasn’t
their core business and revenue from licences such as
ISP formed a meagre part of their revenue.
DoT response
A Bench of Justices Arun Mishra,
S Abdul Nazeer and MR Shah was informed by Solicitor General
Tushar Mehta that the DoT had filed an affidavit explaining
the reasons for raising the demand of AGR-related dues against the PSUs.
Meanwhile, the DoT has sought time from the Bench, which is
hearing the matter through video-conferencing, to respond to the affidavits filed
by telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, on payment of AGR
dues by them.
The Supreme Court has directed the operators to file audited
balance sheets of the past 10 years and come up with payment proposals. It has asked
DoT to consider these proposals. The next hearing in the matter has been scheduled
for the third week of July.
On May 18, the SC had lashed out at Bharti Airtel, Vodafone
Idea and other operators for self-assessing their outstanding telecom dues, saying
they need to pay past dues with interest and penalty, totalling
around ₹1.6-lakh crore.
As per the earlier order on AGR dues, Bharti Airtel has paid
₹18,004 crore of the ₹43,980-crore due, Vodafone Idea has paid ₹6,854
crore of ₹51,400 crore due and the Tata group has paid ₹4,197 crore
of its ₹16,788 crore dues.
The telcos have been pleading with
the Supreme Court to grant them a 20-year time-frame to pay their AGR dues without
any additional bank guarantee or personal guarantees, on which the SC had asked
them to come up with a payment proposal and send it to the DoT.