GST Council Meeting - Showdown Expected
between Centre and Oppn-Ruled States Over Compensation Cess
While the government, in its GST compensation proposal, had
asked the states to borrow to meet revenue shortfall, the states have demanded
setting up of a dispute settlement mechanism.
The Centre and Opposition-ruled states are set for another
face-off when the GST Council meets on Monday to debate the constitutionally
mandated Goods and Services Tax (GST) compensation for state governments for
FY21.
Around 10 non-Bharatiya Janata
Party-ruled states have rejected the finance ministry's proposal.
The government, in its proposal, has asked the states to borrow to
meet the GST revenue shortfall. The states have, however, demanded setting up
of a dispute settlement mechanism.
Kerala, West Bengal, Punjab and Delhi want the Centre to fully
borrow the GST revenue shortfall amount and compensate the states.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman,
while assuring everyone, said, "Nobody is going to be denied compensation
for losses arising out of implementation of GST or due to the coronavirus
pandemic impact."
As many as 21 states - Tamil Nadu and those ruled by BJP - back
borrowing Rs 1.1 lakh crore as the first option. They
want it to be adopted so they can quickly access funds.
About 10 states want a group of ministers (GoM)
to review the proposals or get the GST Council to consider a third option that
involves the Centre and the states sharing the burden of the borrowing,
proposed to bridge the deficit.
This tug of war between the Centre and the states has been going
on for the past few months, ever since the coronavirus pandemic hit the state
governments' revenues.
On August 27, the GST Council, in its 41st meeting, decided to
give its member states two borrowing options to meet their compensation
shortfall and a response time of seven working days from the formal receipt of
the detailed proposal on options.
About 15 states had submitted their options by September 15.
The finance ministry is to facilitate the borrowings through the
RBI's single window at the lowest possible single rate interest to all the
states/UTs as per their individual choice.
OPTION 1 VS OPTION 2
Option 1 offers states to borrow the shortfall, arising out of GST
implementation. It is estimated that approximately Rs
97,000 crore is to be borrowed through the issue of debt under a special window
coordinated by the Ministry of Finance.
The option is to ensure a steady flow of resources, similar to the
flow under GST compensation on a bi-monthly basis.
The main feature of option 1 is that the interest on the borrowing
under the special window will be paid from the cess
as and when it arises until the end of the transition period.
After the transition period, principal and interest will also be
paid from the proceeds of the cess, by extending the cess beyond the transition period for such period as may be
required. The states will not be required to service the debt or to repay it
from any other source.
Moreover, states will also be given permission to borrow the final
installment of 0.5 per cent even without meeting the pre-conditions. This will
enable borrowing of approximately Rs 1 lakh crore in
aggregate. The borrowing under the special window will not be treated as a debt
of the state for any norms which may be prescribed by the Finance Commission,
etc.
Option 2 has offered the states to borrow the entire compensation
shortfall of Rs 2.35 lakh crore (including the Covid-impact portion) through the issue of market debt.
The states will not be required to repay the principal from any
other source. However, the interest shall be paid by the states from their own
resources.