Historic Bali Deal to Spring WTO, Global Economy Ahead
Ministers formally signed off on their
first multilateral trade deal in nearly two decades on Saturday, 7 December
morning in Bali, after several suspenseful days - and nights - of meetings that
had often seemed too close to call.
“Ladies and gentlemen, I am delighted
to say, for the first time in our history, the WTO has truly delivered,”
Director-General Roberto Azevędo said during the
ministerial conference’s closing ceremony on Saturday morning. “It may have
seemed impossible, but now it’s done. We all did deliver here and now. Thank
you.”
The announcement drew a standing
ovation from the audience, many of whom had waited through the night for news.
Gavelling the ministerial conference to a close, Indonesian Trade Minister Gita
Wirjawan, who chaired the meeting, called Bali a
place “where deals get done.”
The final agreement begins with a
three-page ministerial declaration, acknowledging the accession of Yemen and adopting
decisions on the ten texts regarding the three pillars of the Bali package:
trade facilitation, some agricultural issues, and select development-focused
provisions.
The Bali package, analysts say, has the
potential to provide a substantial boost to world trade, with some estimates
indicating that it could increase global GDP by US$1 trillion.
It also features a series of decisions
forwarded by the General Council in areas such as e-commerce and TRIPS
non-violation and situation complaints, as well as other standing items at WTO ministerials.
Rollercoaster ending
The mood at Saturday morning’s ceremony
was that of exhausted elation. Just the day before, the common refrain among
visibly weary officials had been that “we just don’t know,” with many having
been fearful that members might not be able to resolve their differences on
food stocks or trade facilitation.
After hours of waiting and conflicting
reports throughout the day on Friday, news began to emerge that members were
approaching a deal, as the Director-General continued his consultations with
specific delegations in order to find text around which they could all build
consensus.
The draft package was released for
ministers to review at around 8 PM Friday 6 December evening, and included
language to resolve the stand-off between the US and India on food stocks -
bringing to a close a high-profile fight that had for days put the whole Bali
deal in question.
Under the solution proposed by Azevędo - developed after multiple meetings with both US
Trade Representative Mike Froman and Indian Commerce
Minister Anand Sharma - the text now commits members
to negotiating a permanent solution, with the peace clause serving as an
interim arrangement in the meantime.
The revised text also maintains the
deadline for concluding work on this by the original four-year target - the
WTO’s eleventh ministerial conference in 2017 - and says that both existing and
future negotiating submissions should be taken into account when doing so.
Furthermore, only stockholding schemes that exist on the date of the decision
would be covered by the new arrangement, the agreement says.
Thirdly, the text commits countries
using the new flexibility to ensure that their food stockholding scheme does
not “adversely affect the food security of other Members.” As in previous
versions of the draft, it would still also commit them to not distorting trade.
On trade facilitation, of the various
issues that had previously been bracketed in the draft version of Section I,
some - such as consularisation - have been dropped
entirely.
References to pipelines and fixed
infrastructure - a topic that had caused friction between the EU and Russia -
have also been removed. Other areas, such as the use of customs brokers, appear
to have reached compromise solutions by grandfathering rights of those with
schemes in place.
While the trade facilitation, food
stockholding, and tariff rate quota administration texts saw changes over the
last few days, the other draft texts negotiated in Geneva remain essentially
unchanged.
Fight to the finish
The conference dragged into the early
morning hours on Saturday, as ministers began informal meetings after midnight
to discuss the texts presented by Azevędo and
identify any remaining concerns. Pakistan had been one of those to briefly
question language in the food stocks text, particularly on possibilities of
eventual dumping of excess grains in third country markets. They reportedly
dropped their objections when more robust text on safeguards was agreed.
However, the main drama of the evening
revolved around Cuba, who took a vocal stand with the support of Bolivia,
Venezuela, and Nicaragua - also part of the Bolivarian Alliance of the
Americas, or ALBA - regarding the removal of bracketed language in the transit
provision of the trade facilitation draft text.
The language backed by Havana would
have prohibited members from applying discriminatory measures “to goods in
transit, or to vessels or other means of transport from other members” - text
from a Cuban proposal that was aimed against the US embargo imposed in 1960.
In the clean version of the text, that
section had been revised to say that members “shall not seek, take or maintain
any voluntary restraints or any other similar measures on traffic in transit.”
However, this would be “without prejudice to existing and future national
regulations, bilateral and multilateral arrangements related to regulating
transport consistent with WTO rules.”
The controversy over the embargo
subject continued throughout the night, and was only resolved in the early
hours of Saturday morning. The compromise reached - which sources say is
primarily political - includes a line in the ministerial declaration regarding
the trade facilitation draft text. It says that, “in this regard, we reaffirm
that the non-discrimination principle of Article V of GATT 1994 remains valid.”
Doha revival?
The conference in Bali now behind them,
members are now set to revisit the rest of the Doha trade talks, agreeing on
Saturday to prepare a “clearly defined” work programme in the next 12 months on
how to address the remaining parts of the Round.
High on the list, ministers agreed,
would be those issues in the Bali package that were ultimately dropped after
members could not reach “legally binding outcomes.” Work on issues not fully
addressed at the conference will be addressed in the relevant WTO committees,
the declaration says.
The overall Doha Round was formally
declared at an impasse two years ago. Repeated breakdowns have plagued the
talks throughout their 12-year run, with most areas seeing few substantive
developments since the 2008 “mini-ministerial” conference collapsed in Geneva.
The hardest areas of the talks have
centred around agricultural and non-agricultural
market access, and the centrality of reforming agricultural domestic support
policies. Services, the third part of the so-called “market access
trinity,” has also seen virtually no movement in years, to the point where a
subset of WTO members is now negotiating a plurilateral
deal on liberalising trade in services.
Notably, the ministerial declaration
contains specific language regarding a post-Bali agenda: work on issues in the
Doha Round that have not been fully addressed at this week’s conference “will
resume in the relevant Committees or Negotiating Groups of the WTO.”
It further states that the “work
programme will be developed in a way that is consistent with the guidance
provided at MC8, including the need to look at ways that may allow members to
overcome the most critical and fundamental stumbling blocks” - language that
for most observers refers to methods as such the possibility of pursuing plurilateral approaches.