Impact of Covid-19 on
India’s International Trade: Strategies and Policy Perspectives
Ř
Former Senior Trade
Economist Analysis World Trade Crash in 308 page Report for Exim Bank
Ř
Sees Revival in
2021 – Pharma Sector to Boom
Ř
Agri Prices Hold
Ř
China Fastest in
Rebound
There are a bunch of issues and policy
suggestions, some for the nearer term and some for the longer term. However,
COVID-19 is a constantly developing and changing phenomenon and policymakers
have to keep their eyes open and ears close to the ground and make quick and
suitable changes in policies and strategies.
Report Highlights:
· Impact of Covid-19 on India’s External Trade: General and by Major
Sectors
·
Impact of COVID-19
on India’s International Trade
· COVID-19 Related Disruptions for India:
· Impact of COVID-19 on India’s Trade with Major
Markets including QUAD and by Major Sectors – A Comparison with China
· COVID-19 and Trade Measures by India and Other Major
Trading Partners of India: A Comparison
· Merchandise Trade Measures by Some Other Major
Trading Partners of India
· Services Trade Measures by India in the wake of
COVID-19
· Services Trade measures by Some Other Major Trading
Partners of India
· Trade-related IPR Measures in the wake of COVID-19
· Impact of COVID-19 on Some Important Merchandise and Services Export
Sectors
· Sector-wise Impact of COVID-19 for Merchandise Exports
· Sector-wise Impact of COVID-19 for Services Exports
· COVID-19 and India’s International Trade: Export Prospects, Opportunities
and Trade Strategies/Policy Suggestions
· Opportunities in the Context of COVID-19
· General Opportunities
· Sector-Specific Opportunities
· Trade Strategies and Policy Suggestions in the context of COVID-19
Pandemic
· Logistics related Issues and Policy suggestions
· Major Foreign Trade, Tax-Related and Other Issues and Policy Suggestions
· Agriculture and Related Exports
· Textiles and Garments Sector
· Engineering Exports
· Pharmaceuticals Exports
·
Electronics including ICT Hardware
Exports
·
Leather and Footwear Exports
· Chemicals Exports
· Gems and Jewellery Exports
· Marine Exports
· IT-BPM Sector Exports
·
Shipping Services
· Tourism Sector
·
Telecom and Digital Communications
Sector
·
Issues and Policy Suggestions related to
Exports
· Two side effects of the contractions in global trade emerged during the
lockdown.
·
Strategies and Policies Related to Trade
Diversion and Self-Reliance
·
Strategies and Policies to face Emerging
Trade Restrictions and Market Access Challenges
· Inter-Sectoral Linkages
· Implementation of Strategies and Policies
· Implementation in the Nearer Term
· Implementation in the Longer time period
· Conclusion
[By Dr. H.A.C. Prasad, Former Senior Economic Advisor]
Global Trade
Scenario Following the Pandemic: Overview
The COVID -19
crisis which has come out of the blue is worse than the Great Depression as the
Economic Crisis is due to the Health Crisis and the World has to fight against
an unknown enemy. The extent of fall in World Trade however is more or
less similar in both situations. While World export growth
reached the lowest level by falling steeply by 32.1% in 1932 during the Great
Depression, after which recovery started, growth in total World Trade of goods
and services fell steeply in April 2020 by 24.0%, with growth reaching a trough
in May 2020 of -26.3%, due to COVID-19 crisis after which recovery started.
World Services trade growth was still lower at -29.1% resulting in the growth
of World trade (Goods and Services) falling by 26.3%.
While
World Trade Volume (Goods & Services) is expected to contract by 10.4 %
in 2020, it is expected to pick up in 2021 by 8.3%. Contact-intensive
sectors and tourism-intensive and remittance-dependent countries are likely to
be more affected by the pandemic.
Impact
of Covid-19 on World Economy and Trade of India’s Major Trading Partners:
While
World Trade growth fell steeply in April-May 2020, World GDP growth also saw a
fall with growth in the quarter ending June 2019
at -6.9%, World GDP growth is projected at -4.4 percent in 2020 and at 5.2
percent in 2021.
Trade
of all major trading partners of India was affected by COVID-19 particularly in
April, May, June 2020, while for India the impact on trade started in March
2020 itself when restrictions and lockdown started. The
impact on China was early in January and February 2020 with even trade data
being not available for these months. China seems to have coped up with the
crisis though the situation is still volatile.
In
the case of Merchandise Trade of the World,
the monthly growth rates of the top 10 products of World Trade at the two-digit
HS level with a share of above 60% in World Trade in 2019, shows that high
negative growth started from March/April 2020 for most of them, though for some
items like electrical machinery and equipment (HS Chapter 85) and machinery,
mechanical appliances, nuclear reactors (HS Chapter 84), it started in January
2020 itself. Only in the case of Pharmaceutical products (HS Chapter 30), there
was continuous positive growth till July 2020. In August 2020 there was a small
negative growth and in October 2020, negative growth was high as in the case of
other items as well, when the second wave of COVID-19 started in western
countries. A similar analysis for the major trading partners of India like the
USA, the EU, China, Japan and ASEAN shows that the ASEAN is the only major
country/grouping among the ones examined where green shoots of export growth
have not yet appeared in major items. However, in October 2020, there was high
negative export growth even for developed market economies besides developing
market economies because of the second wave of COVID-19 though the impact was
not felt in some countries like the US and Japan.
In
the case of World services trade, while all
categories of services have a negative growth rate in Q1 and Q2 2020, Travel is
the worst hit with export growth in Q2 2020 at -82.2% followed by
Transport at -31.9% and Other commercial services at -15.1%. The impact of the pandemic
which started in Q1 2020 aggravated in Q2 2020 with a further fall in the export
growth of different services. A similar analysis for major trading partners of
India like the US, the EU, Japan, China and ASEAN, shows that the
pandemic severely affected services exports of all the major trading partners
except China where the negative growth of total services exports was small and
it was mainly Travel which was affected.
Thus
the COVID-19 pandemic has affected World Trade in both goods and services and
also in major sectors of major trading partners of India, though the impact on
sectors and countries varies.
Impact of
Covid-19 on India’s External Trade: General and by Major Sectors
Impact of Covid-19
on the Indian Economy:
Like
other economies, the Indian economy has also been badly affected by COVID-19.
In Q2 2020, India’s GDP growth fell by 23.9%.
While positive agricultural growth continued at 3.4%, Industrial growth fell by
38.1%. Services sector growth also fell by 20.6%. In Q3 2020, GDP growth fall
softened to -7.5% with agriculture growth being the same as in Q2 2020 of 3.4%,
Industrial growth at -2.1% and services growth continuing to be negative at
-11.4%.
Impact
of COVID-19 on India’s International Trade
India’s
merchandise exports of 324.3 billion in 2019
grew at a negative rate of -0.18%. Thus even before the pandemic, India’s
export growth was marginally negative.
As per DGSI&S data, with the Pandemic, export growth which was
positive at 3.3% in February 2020 fell steeply by 34.3% in March 2020 reaching
a low of -61.0% in April 2020. In subsequent months, it became less negative
and even became positive in September 2020. But after that, it has again become
negative in October and November 2020,
though export growth was marginally positive at 0.1% in December 2020.
India’s
Merchandise import growth was also negative at -5.6 %
in 2019 and became slightly positive at 3.6% in February 2020. In March 2020 it
became negative at -28.0% reaching a trough of -59.7% in April 2020, and thereafter
becoming less negative with even a positive growth of 7.6% in December 2020.
India’s
Services exports grew by 8.3% in 2019 and continued to
be positive till March 2020. In April 2020, services export growth plummeted to
-8.9% reaching a trough of -10.8% in July 2020, and even in November 2020, it
registered negative growth.
India’s
services import growth was also positive at 11.5%
in 2019 and grew robustly from September 2019 to February 2020 with a growth of
12.8% in February 2020. But in March 2020, it became negative reaching a low of
-21.7% in July 2020. Even in November 2020, import growth was highly negative.
COVID-19
Related Disruptions for India:
Disruptions
in merchandise trade due to COVID-19 have taken place both from the demand side
and supply side. While imports from a country by other
countries are usually considered to reflect the demand for the exports of a
country, in the present case it is difficult to distinguish between demand-side
and supply-side disruptions with the data. This is because the Pandemic was
world-wide and lockdown and supply chain disruptions were all-pervasive with
less scope for trade diversion in the initial stages. However, it will help to
see the extent to which India was affected by these disruptions.
The
import growth of the major export partners of India
shows that while the disruptions in trade due to the Pandemic were present
world-wide, the months and intensity of the impact on India and by major
countries varied. The import growth of the World and major countries from
India was more negative than from their import growth from the World,
particularly at the peak of the pandemic and lockdown during March to May 2020.
After that, it was less negative in the case of World imports from India
compared to World imports from the World, while in the case of the imports of
other countries from World vs India it varied.
Services
import growth of the World (from the World)
became continuously negative from January 2020, and highly negative
particularly from April-October 2020. World’s services imports from India
continued to be positive till March 2020 mainly due to Telecommunications,
Computer and Information Services and Other Business Services and became
negative from April to October 2020. But the extent of negative growth of the
World from India was much less compared to its negative growth from the World.
Bilateral
Services Trade shows that the major countries/country
groups which imported India’s services are the US, the UK, the EU, Singapore,
the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, and Sweden. The major
services exports of India to the US, are Computer Services and other business
services; to the UK, other Business services and Travel; to the EU, other
business services and Telecommunications, Computer and Information Services; to
Singapore, other business services, Telecommunications, Computer and
Information Services; etc. However, only 2019 data is available for some
countries and for some others it is even older. Since the latest data on
imports of services from India by India’s major services markets, are not
available, to gauge the impact of the pandemic on India’s services exports to
major markets, the total import growth of services by major services markets of
India has been considered for different quarters as a proxy. Services import
growth rates of all the major markets of India were highly negative in Q2 2020
and naturally, their import growth from India could also have been affected.
An
examination of the growth rates of India’s principal export commodities shows
that while all items were affected by the pandemic and lockdown, Agri and
Allied items and ores and minerals, some manufactures like chemicals and
related products, Textiles, Transport equipment and even Gems and Jewellery are
showing green shoots.
The
quarterly data for services exports by major service sectors
show that India’s services exports have been relatively less affected by the
pandemic than merchandise exports as the major exports are computer and IT
services, though there are sectoral differences.
Impact
of COVID-19 on India’s Trade with Major Markets including QUAD and by Major
Sectors – A Comparison with China
In
the case of Merchandise Exports, to see the impact of
COVID-19 on India’s exports in major markets, particularly the QUAD in
comparison with China’s exports to these markets, import data of these markets,
sector-wise at a 2-digit level has been compiled and compared. There are many
big ticket items under Codes 84 and 85 in India’s exports to QUAD and other
major markets of India where trade diversion from China to India is possible. In
the case of QUAD(3)’s imports from India, there are 4 items in the list of
QUAD’s imports from China where positive growth in all quarters and also high
growth in most of the quarters can be seen in QUAD’s imports from India, but
not from China where there is negative growth in the last few or most of the
quarters. They are Automatic data processing machines (Code 8471), Electrical
transformers (Code 8504), Telephone sets, etc. (Code 8577), Monitors and
Projectors, etc. (Code 8528), and Insulated including enamelled or anodized
wire (Code 8544). Telephone sets, etc. (Code 8577) is another such item with
high positive growth in the last 3 quarters 2019 Q4 to 2020 Q2 in QUAD’s
imports from India, but negative growth in all quarters, in QUAD’s imports from
China. Thus, there are signs of trade diversion from China to India in
QUAD’s imports. This needs strengthening of the QUAD.
On
the merchandise import side, China’s imports from QUAD
and other countries were not much affected by the pandemic. This could be
because there was no national lockdown in China as in India. It could also be
due to China’s calculated policy to not limit imports much from other
countries, lest it could affect their exports to these countries and also their
supply chains which were providing inputs for their manufacturing exports.
In
the case of services exports and imports, the
composition of services exports to QUAD by India and China differs.
Telecommunications, computer and information services is the major service
export category of India, followed by Other Business Services and Travel, while
Other Business Services, followed by Transport and Travel are the major
services exports of China. The composition of services imports from different
sources by India and China shows similarities in the import baskets of these
countries from the US and Australia, while there are dissimilarities in terms
of the importance of services in the import baskets from Japan, the EU, the UK
and the Netherlands. India is a relatively small services market compared to
China for the different countries.
COVID-19
and Trade Measures by India and Other Major Trading Partners of India: A
Comparison
Merchandise
Trade Measures by India in the wake of COVID-19
In
the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, countries across the World have taken many
measures including trade measures. The ITC and WTO have listed out many such
trade measures taken by different countries in the context of the COVID-19
crisis. Unlike some other countries like China, the USA, Brazil, Russia,
etc. in the case of India, all the listed major merchandise trade
measures are on an MFN basis and not specific to any country. Some major trade
measures of India are the following.
Liberalizing
Measures: These include lifting the import ban
on medical ventilators; extension of timeframes for automatic registration
number generated under SIMS (Steel Importing Monitoring System) for Iron and Steel
imports; tariff exemption on certain medical supply products; and tariff
reduction on medical or surgical instruments and apparatus.
Restrictive
Measures:
·
Licensing or Permit requirements to
export medicaments/drugs: This measure which is still active has
been flagged as restrictive by ITC. Though restrictive it was done to safeguard
the citizens of India and was due to exigencies arising from COVID-19.
·
Export Prohibition of medical supply
products, masks, ventilators, textile raw materials for mask production:
While the ITC has termed this measure as restrictive, it was again due to
medical exigencies and was only a temporary measure. The measure was fully
terminated by 16/9/2020.
·
Suspension of signing new contracts by
Indian Rice Traders: The ITC has termed this development as a
restrictive measure of licensing or permit requirements to export and states the
measure is still active. This is a totally wrong classification as the step to
suspend signing new contracts was taken by the rice traders due to supply chain
constraints and not any restriction by the Government. In fact, signing new
contracts resumed a few months after suspension.
·
Export prohibition of alcohol-based hand
sanitizers: While the ITC has termed this as restrictive,
this temporary measure was to make adequate supplies available for the citizens
during the crisis and was due to medical exigencies.
·
Export prohibition of Hydroxychloroquine:
While
the ITC has termed it as restrictive, this measure was taken more out of
anxiety to have adequate stocks of a possible medicine to fight the mysterious
disease.
·
Export restrictions on certain
diagnostic instruments, apparatus and reagents: This
is a need-based restriction for India and also a potential opportunity to
increase production.
·
Import ban on military equipment: Though
the start date is given as 9/8/2020, the details are yet to be worked out. This
is part of India’s strategy of ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’.
·
Export prohibition of onions: While
the ban has been lifted from January 1, 2021, India needs to find a lasting
solution for this and have a stable Agri Trade policy, lest it loses
established markets.
·
Some other trade measures implemented by
India: These include prohibiting exports of Textiles, raw
materials for masks and coveralls (from 13 July 2020) which include the non-woven
fabric of 25 to 75 GSM and meltdown fabric of any GSM; and prohibition for
exports of medical coveralls of all classes and categories (from 21 July 2020)
except surgical drapes, isolation aprons, surgical wraps and x-ray gowns. These
are due to considerations of medical necessity.
Thus,
while many of India’s trade measures are categorized as restrictive by the ITC,
they are not really restrictive in the real sense of the term and some have
already been terminated.
Merchandise
Trade Measures by Some Other Major Trading Partners of India
In
the case of the USA, there were 2 liberalising
measures specific to China and Malaysia and one general measure. All the other
major trade measures of the US are restrictive in nature and are on an MFN
basis. These include licensing or permit requirements to export respirators,
surgical masks and surgical gloves from 3/4/2020 which is still active; export
prohibition of 5 types of personal protective equipment (PPE) without explicit
approval by FEMA from 3/4/2020 to 31/12/2020; Presidential Memoranda allocating
to domestic use certain personal protective equipment; and Initiation of an
investigation by the USITC aiming at identifying imported goods related to the
response to COVID-19 pandemic, their source countries, tariff classifications
and applicable rates of duty which appears to be a potential restrictive measure.
In
the case of China, the liberalizing measures include tariff
reduction on certain imports from the US by exempting from additional 10% ad
valorem tariff increase from 28/2/2020 to 27/2/2021 which is a reverse trade
war measure; and the temporary import tariff reduction on medical
supplies, raw materials, agricultural products and meat which is still active
and applied on an MFN basis from 6/2/2020.
China
also implemented many trade facilitation measures. These
include among others nine exceptional facilitation measures for agricultural
products including three categories of agricultural administrative approvals
(license renewal, simplification of approval procedure and optimization of
approval process) to prevent the further spreading of the pandemic; and optimizing
the application and updating process of electronic keys and encouraging
enterprises to apply for and update electronic keys online from 6/2/2020.
However,
China also applied some restrictive measures, some exceptionally harsh.
These include the conformity assessments for medical supply products from
31/3/2020 by new certification and inspection requirements which are still
active; ban on the export of test kits, medical supplies by firms not licensed
to sell at home from 1/4/2020 which was downgraded on April 26, 2020, to export
restriction upon authorization and is still active; and the import ban (from coronavirus-hit
countries) on frozen meat, fish and seafood implemented on 17/8/2020 by China’s
southern Guangdong province which was relaxed by allowing certain countries to
resume exports to China on 19/08/2020 and is also still active.
Other
countries also implemented trade measures, some
liberalizing and some restrictive, which were similar to the ones implemented
by India.
Most
of the items where there is some sort of temporary restrictions or
liberalization by different countries including India are mainly medical-related
items or agricultural items that are important to fight the pandemic or were
needed from the food security point of view. Items needed to build the economy
or for self-reliance are limited in number. There are many cases of
misclassification of these measures as restrictive for India by ITC. There are
also some cases where the countries have tried to use potential export
opportunities by such measures.
Services
Trade Measures by India in the wake of COVID-19
Some
trade measures were taken by India for the services sector in the wake of the COVID-19
pandemic. While some are common for other sectors also,
some are specific to services. These include the amendment to the policy
to curb takeovers or acquisitions of Indian companies as a result of the
pandemic on 18th April 2020; the RBI relaxation by which Banks were
allowed to maintain a lower level of liquidity in March-April 2020; the
RBI authorizing Banks to deal in offshore non-deliverable rupee derivative
markets (offshore NDF rupee market); and another liberalizing measure of relaxing
the guidelines for Other Service Providers (OSPs) on 13 March 2020 in
Telecommunication services and issuing the Guidelines for OSPs on 5/11/2020
wherein no registration certificate will be required for OSP centres in India.
Services
Trade measures by Some Other Major Trading Partners of India
In
the case of the US, the measures include a
major restrictive measure related to Non-immigrant Visa, wherein starting
from June 24, 2020 to end of 2020, the US suspended entry of foreign nationals
in certain non-immigrant Visa categories by the “Proclamation Suspending Entry
of Aliens who present a risk to the US Labor Market following the Coronavirus
outbreak”; a liberalizing measure related to Air Transport Services wherein the
US waived its slot – use requirements on 11 March 2020 upto 31 May 2020 for US
and foreign airlines that operated affected flights; and other measures related
to Telecommunications which are either liberalizing or facilitating measures including
the $200 million telehealth program, the $100 million connected care Pilot
Program, the “Keep Americans Connected Initiative”, the altered regulations for
Rural Health Care and E-rate programs of the FCC and the Special temporary
authority (STA) by FCC to T-Mobile USA on 15 March 2020 to use additional
spectrum in the 600MHz Band to meet increased customer demand for broadband
during the pandemic and a similar STA for US Cellular on 18 March to meet increased
customer demand for mobile broadband
In
the case of the EU, the restrictive measure
affecting all sectors including services is the EC's new guidelines from
25/3/2020 for screening FDI in companies and critical assets located in the EU.
In
the case of China, the measures include the
circular on 10/2/2020 requiring local departments to provide necessary services
for Foreign-Invested enterprises and Investment Attraction work which is a pro-active
measure worth emulating by India; and the People’s Bank of China, cutting the
Required Reserve ratio by 1 percentage point on 3 April 2020 with a cut of 0.5
percentage points from April 15 and May 15 each time, for rural credit
cooperatives, rural commercial banks, rural cooperative banks, village banks, as
well as city commercial banks operating solely within provincial-level
administrative regions which is also worth considering by India where rural
cooperative banks face liquidity issues.
In
the case of other countries, measures similar to that of India were taken. For
example, the UAE lifted restrictions on Voice over Internet Protocol
(VoIP) on 24 March 2020. It decided to allow certain VoIP applications so as to
facilitate WFH (Work From Home). Permitted applications include Microsoft
Teams, Skype for Business, Google Hangouts Meet, CISCO Webex and Zoom.
One
important thing to be noted is the liberalizing/facilitative measures in
Telecom Sector by different countries including the USA emphasizing broadband
services. India needs to give serious thought to using its potential in
Broadband services.
Trade-related
IPR Measures in the wake of COVID-19
Some
IPR Measures by India include extending certain deadlines for patent,
design and trademark matters on 19/3/2020. The US and to some extent Taiwan
have been very proactive regarding IPR measures in the wake of COVID-19 like
the prioritized Examination Pilot Programs for Patents, certain Trademark and
Servicemark applications and waiving petition fees in certain situations
considering COVID-19 as an extraordinary situation by the US. India can also
consider adopting some of these measures.
Impact of
COVID-19 on Some Important Merchandise and Services Export Sectors
India’s General
and Trade-related Measures for The Economy in Response To COVID-19
COVID-19 has impacted all sectors of the economy. In response to COVID-19, the Government of India in May 2020 announced ₹20 lakh crore to Atamnirbhar Bharat Abhiyan
to make the country self-reliant. Detailed
measures under the economic package of Rs. 20
lakh crore equivalent to about 10% of India’s GDP was announced subsequently in
five tranches which included measures for different sectors.
While many of the
general measures also help the trade sector of India, some specific trade-related
measures were also taken. The Government
introduced several relaxations and extensions in deadlines etc. with regard to
compliances mandated under its schemes and activities. The key relaxations include
the extension of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-2020; extension of IGST
and Compensation Cess Exemption; extension of
validity of Registration cum Membership Certificate (RCMC); extensions related
to merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS); extension of the validity
period of all Status Holder Certificates; inclusion of some FTAs in the Digital Platforms and issuing Digital
Signatures; accepting scanned documents to get REX number to avail EU-GSP;
forming a Committee to determine ceiling rates under Remission of Duties or
Taxes on Export Product (RoDTEP) scheme; enhancing the sanctioned limit to the
eligible under priority lending norms by RBI; extending the Interest
Equalization Scheme on Pre and Post shipment credit; increasing the maximum
permissible period of pre-shipment and post-shipment export credit sanctioned
by banks; extending the realization period of export proceeds; extending validity
of all the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) certificates, announcing the Nirvik (Niryat Rin Vikas Yojana) scheme; amending SEZ law
under which trusts are allowed to set up units in special economic zones; exemption of
customs duty for health-related items; extension of the period of validity of
existing Export Performance Certificates; facility to file Form GSTR-3B and
GSTR-1 through electronic verification code (EVC); exemption for the exporters
from enforcement of the provisions of automatic caution listing; liquidity facility
for Exim Bank of India by extending a line of credit of Rs. 15,000 crore; extension
of the time period for payment for imports; and disallowing some levies/charges
for Shipping Companies.
Sector-wise Impact
of COVID-19 for Merchandise Exports
1) Agri and Related
Exports: Like other sectors, Agri Exports were
also affected by the Pandemic. All flights and container movements were at a
standstill in April-May 2020 period. The perishable products suffered due to the
non-operation of sea containers. The freight charges by Cargo flight operators increased.
Exports of almost all agricultural items were affected with very high negative
growth in March/April 2020 except Fresh Vegetables. However, from June 2020
onwards exports of most of the Agricultural items picked up. Total exports of Agricultural and allied items (including
plantations) registered positive growth from June 2020 onwards with growth in
October 2020 at 43.4%. The major export item, Rice (Basmati) registered
negative growth only from March to May 2020, while Rice (other than Basmati)
registered negative growth only in March 2020.
2) Textiles and
Garments Exports: The apparel sector is one of the highly impacted sectors. With a
long value chain, spread across continents, the sector has seen a multiplier
effect of the interplay of the challenges of various stakeholders and
countries. Textiles and allied products
have been registering high negative growth since March 2020, but the negativity
has been falling during July-August 2020. Though the Indian
textile and apparel factories have resumed operations with the starting of the
unlock process since May 2020, they have been able to function at only around
50% of the capacities due to lack of workers and demand for the manufactures. With
signs of improvements, there has been an encouraging increase in September 2020
export value of Textiles & Garments by 13.8% and also in October 2020 by
9.4%.
3) Engineering
Exports: India’s
Engineering exports, one of the major export sectors of India, which registered
negative export growth in 2019-20 of -6.1% was also affected by COVID-19 with
export growths in March, April and May 2020 being highly negative at -42.7%,
-64.6% and -23.9% respectively. The situation has improved since then with even
positive export growth in July and September 2020. While almost all the
engineering goods were affected by the pandemic, major items like Transport
equipment with a share of 31% in 2019-20 registered high negative growths of
-60.4%, -65.0% and -40.8%, -38.9% in March, April, May, June 2020 respectively.
Machinery another major subcategory of engineering goods with a 37.5% share
also registered high negative growth in April 2020, though in September and
October 2020, there is some positive growth. Base Metals with a share of 31.4%
was relatively less affected with negative growth only in April and May 2020
and positive growth till September 2020. In October 2020 however, there is a
marginal negative growth. Though the external situation is challenging,
there are early signals of pick up in industrial activity in some countries,
mostly in North America resulting in pick up in Engineering exports.
4) Pharmaceuticals
Sector: In
the case of Pharmaceuticals, prices of raw materials and packaging material
increased by 3-4%. Around 25-30% extra freight charges were also paid during
the Lockdown. The global business was down by 15% against expectations for the
year. Though activities were delayed, they are regaining momentum now. Before
the Pandemic, the export graph was trending upwards. Once the pandemic set in
and the lockdown was imposed, exports slowed down and the graph moved downward.
Now it is back to normalcy and the situation is as good as prior to Covid-19.
5) Electronics
including ICT Hardware Sector: Electronics hardware exports, which were badly
affected in April and May 2020 with -69.4% and -44.4% growth respectively are
yet to show positive growth with October 2020 export growth being still
negative at -10.2% and cumulative export growth for April-October 2020 being
-23.3%. Major components of electronics exports like Telecom instruments,
Electronics instruments, Electronic components and also computer hardware
peripherals though with a small share, continued to register negative growth in
October 2020, while consumer Electronics started registering positive and
good growth from June 2020 to October 2020.
6) Leather and
Footwear Exports: India’s export of leather, leather products and footwear during
April – October 2020 declined by 36.8%. The decline was almost uniform in all
major items. However, in October 2020, the negativity in export growth of
leather and related products was less at -14.8 %. Europe and the USA are the
major markets for leather, leather products and footwear exported from India,
accounting for 70% of exports of these items. These markets have been
adversely affected by the COVID 19 Pandemic which led to lockdowns and market
closure in February 2020. The Pandemic and the lockdowns significantly affected
the Spring – Summer 2020 sales in the overseas markets. According to
industry sources, the leather, leather products and footwear sector lost export
orders to the tune of US$ 1 billion due to the Pandemic. On the supply side
(i.e. supply of raw materials and inputs), the import of inputs was affected in
January 2020 and February 2020 as the industry imports components and inputs
from China. However, the supply chain was restored in April 2020.
7) Chemicals Sector
Exports: Chemical exports excluding Pharmaceuticals were mainly affected by the
pandemic and lockdown in March and April 2020 and continue to register negative
or low growth. However, Chemicals exports including Pharmaceuticals was
relatively less affected in March and April 2020 and recovered quickly with
positive growth from June 2020 to October 2020. Drug
Formulations, Biologicals the major item in Pharmaceuticals and also Chemicals
exports registered negative growth only in March 2020 and in most of the later
months registered more than 20% positive growth. Bulk drugs and drug
intermediates also registered positive growth from May 2020 to October 2020.
Organic Chemicals, the second major chemicals sector item registered relatively
high negative growth in March and April 2020 and continued to register negative
growth in the subsequent months with -21.7% growth in October 2020.
8) Gems and
Jewellery Exports: India’s Gems and Jewellery exports growth which has been
decelerating since the beginning of the financial year 2019-2020 on account of
various domestic as well as global challenges, was severely impacted by the
pandemic. This
is apparent, as there was a fall in G&J exports by 11.6%, 20.1% and 41.0%
in the month of January, February and March 2020. For the full fiscal 2019-20,
Gems and Jewellery exports fell by 10.8%. The highest fall in G & J exports
was in April 2020 by 98.7% followed by May 2020 by 69.0%. After that, the
extent of negativeness is becoming less with growth in October 2020 at -21.3%. Overall,
both demand and supply got choked which led to a decline in production,
employment, sales/exports, income resulting in a highly adverse situation for
the entire Gems and Jewellery Sector. However, exports have started to regain
momentum now.
9) Marine Exports: COVID 19 pandemic
led to a fall in demand in the foodservice segment which in turn was due to the
closure of restaurants, canteens, institutional catering, etc. Demand is yet to
stabilize in the major markets. Production and exports were affected due to
shortage of labour, lack of transportation facility, less availability of
refrigerated containers, difficulties in sending export documents due to non-availability
of courier services, difficulties in clearing containers in importing
countries, scarcity of raw materials, packaging and labelling materials.
Limited cargo flight availability and huge logistics costs due to COVID-19 had a
significant impact on exports of high-value products like chilled and live
products. Marine export growth during April - September 2020 declined by
25.0% in quantity terms and 19.2% in dollar value terms compared to the same
previous period.
Sector-wise
Impact of COVID-19 for Services Exports
1)
IT-BPM sector: IT-BPM services
in 2019-20 registered a good growth of 7.3% in domestic product and 8.1% of
exports of the IT-BPM sector. However, the latest data is not yet available,
except the BOP data for Exports of Telecommunications, Computer and Information
Services which shows negative growth of 0.9% in Q2 2020 and positive growth of
7.7% in Q3 2020. The Impact of COVID-19 on the performance of the IT-BPM sector as
per NASSCOM Industry Review August 2020 which is based on the
quarterly results declared by the top listed India-centric IT-BPM companies comprising
over 46% of the Industry shows that revenues bottomed out for most companies in
Q2 2020 declining by 6% on a ‘QoQ’ basis and net margins also declined. Digital
revenue grew by 1.5% sequentially, resulting in ‘digital’ accounting for an
even larger share in the total revenue at 44.1% during the quarter. The
on-site-offshore revenue mix continued to shift to off-shore which registered a
slight increase from 63.3% share in Q2 2019 to 64% in Q1 2020 and 64.4% in Q2
2020. In Q2 2020 all the geographic markets declined on Q on Q basis as well as
on annual basis, though North America with 62% of Industry share in
2019-20 demonstrated relative resilience with growth at -5.2% (QoQ basis) and
-3.6% (YoY basis). The Indian market
declined the highest at -17.3% (QoQ) and -18.9% (YoY). Like markets, all the
major verticals were down both sequentially and on an annual basis.
Travel and Hospitality was the worst-hit pulling down the growth of Emerging
Verticals to -8.8% (QoQ), and -4.7% (YoY). BSFI (Banking, Financial Services
and Insurance) was the most resilient with growth falling only by 3.2% (QoQ)
and 1.7% (YoY).
2)
Shipping Services: The steep fall in
World merchandise trade due to the pandemic and lockdown mirrored in the steep fall
in the Baltic Dry Index, which fell to a
low of 393 in May 2020, which was slightly higher than the low in 2016 of 290
clearly indicating the impact of COVID-19 on both merchandise trade and
Shipping services. It has now picked up and in September 2020, it remained
steady at 1725 which however is below the recent high of 2378 recorded in
August 2019.
The impact of
COVID-19 on India’s Merchandise Trade and Shipping services is also reflected
in the traffic handled at Major Ports. The total traffic
handled in Major Ports of India during April-November 2020 fell by 10.7% over the
corresponding previous period. Except for Mormugao port with 17.6% positive
growth, the traffic declined in all Major Ports. The Indian EXIM container
trade was also severely affected by COVID-19 as India’s import volumes
dropped 26%. As a result, several port calls were cancelled, and services were withdrawn
or merged. However, normalcy is expected to return by the end of the year
with EXIM volumes returning to pre-COVID-19 levels.
3)
Tourism Sector: International Tourist Arrivals (ITAs) declined
by 65.5% for World, 60.1% for USA, 84.1% for China and 53.5% for India in H1
2020. International Tourism Receipts (ITRs) also fell sharply for most of the
countries, though the fall for India is relatively less at -8.9%. While the fall
in growth of ITAs for India at -53.5% in H1 2020 is comparable with other
countries, the fall in growth of ITRs of -8.9% in H1 2020 is relatively lower
than in other countries. The Systemic Risk Survey carried out by the RBI
which has been presented in its Financial Stability Report, July 2020 has
identified five sectors which are most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Within these five sectors, the tourism & hospitality sector is the
one which is most affected where 90% of the respondents foresee a bleak
business scenario for at least the next six months.
4)
Telecom and Digital Communications (Broadband) Sector: COVID-19 has cast a shadow on the Global and Indian economy and
has demonstrated the importance of digital readiness.
As countries go through a prolonged phase of lockdown, people are virtually
connected and are working from home, with the digital infrastructure provided
by Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) being the only link. The pandemic also
led to some positive developments. In India, the wireless data traffic which was
around 6,900 PB (Petabyte) per month, before the COVID-19 outbreak, increased
to around 8,280 PB
per month in the initial weeks under COVID-19, mainly due to the surge in Video
Traffic. This is an increase of almost 20%. The data Consumption per subscriber
per month increased to 12.4 GB in April & May 2020 from 10.3 GB per month
in previous months. Certain key things pending also came to the fore which otherwise would
have been stuck in the rigmarole of administrative procedures. One such
thing is the work related to Digital Communications Networks where a lot of
work continued during the pandemic thanks to the large connectivity available. The pandemic also showed the paucity of connectivity
in rural areas and galvanized the government to work in this direction.
COVID-19 and
India’s International Trade: Export Prospects, Opportunities and Trade
Strategies/Policy Suggestions
Prospects and
likely scenario for India’s exports of goods and services
India’s total
exports of goods and services growth were highly
negative during March, April and May 2020 with the highest negative growth in
April 2020 of nearly -40% with the lockdown imposed in response to the COVID-19
crisis. However, green shoots have started to appear.
In the
merchandise goods sector, quarterly growth figures show that many sectors are
slowly moving from the Negative Growth Zone to the Positive Growth Zone. Six items that
were in the positive zone in Q3 2020 continued to be in the positive zone in Q4
2020 (October-November). They are ores and minerals (which has been in positive
zone in all 4 quarters 2020 Q1 to 2020 Q4); Agri and allied products; Articles
of stone, cement and glass; Sports goods; Paper and related products; and
Chemicals. Textiles and allied products have moved to positive territory along
with Optical and Medical instruments needed in the fight against coronavirus.
In the case of
the services sector, three important sectors have moved to the positive zone in
Q3 2020. Some sectors like Telecommunications, Computer and Information
Services and Other Business Services moved to negative growth territory only in
Q2 2020 with a marginal negative growth quickly to rebound in Q3 2020. Even
Transport moved to positive territory in Q3 2020 after two-quarters of negative
growth. Charges for the use of intellectual property, n.i.e. is the only
service sector that was in positive territory in all the four quarters from Q4
2019 to Q3 2020.
The Economic
Survey 2020-2021 has projected a V-shaped recovery in the GDP growth of the
economy. There is a similar V-shaped recovery in merchandise exports of
India. This is similar to the V-shaped/U-shaped recovery in world trade and
trade of some developed countries like the USA and the EU. As per the WTO, a
9.2% decline in the volume of World merchandise trade for 2020, followed by a
7.2% rise in 2021 is forecasted.
In line with the
WTO forecast, India’s export performance could be better than expected in
2020-2021. Exports are expected to rebound, despite some hiccups in 2021,
firstly due to the base effect and then actual growth as exports are also
slowly limping back to normalcy with the lockdown being removed and not likely
to be imposed. Thus, while supply-side constraints are slowly going, demand has
to pick up in the case of merchandise exports. As regards services, some
services like Tourism are in limbo as limited passenger Air Transport is
allowed only in some Air Travel bubbles on a reciprocal basis, though scheduled
cargo flights are allowed even for foreign airlines from six Indian cities. IT
services which showed resilience even at the height of the pandemic are likely
to perform better in 2021.
Opportunities in
the Context of COVID-19
COVID-19 has also
thrown open opportunities for India on the trade front. Some general and some
sector-specific.
General
Opportunities
The first major
opportunity is the possibility of Trade Diversion away from China to India by
major countries. There are indications of countries diverting
trade from China to other countries including India. The overdependence of
countries on China in key areas of manufacturing was exposed with the total cut
off in supply chains following the lockdown in China and later due to
transportation bottlenecks. The China +1 policy is a direct result of this as
countries realized the follies of a single-sourcing model. This will be a real
opportunity for India if it gears up to utilize it. However, this opportunity
may turn out to be a myth for India as China has quickly responded to the
situation resulting in its exports quickly rebounding with continuous
positive export growth from June 2020 and the export growth at a high of 21.1%
(YoY) in November 2020. This rebound has happened also because of its increase
in exports to even developed countries. China also followed a very balancing
act of not limiting its imports, particularly from major developed countries.
The second major
opportunity for India is the possibility of greater exports of Pharmaceutical
items and the possibility of being the manufacturing base for providing the
vaccine to the World. While India’s Pharmaceutical exports withstood
the crisis with export growth of above 10% from May 2020 onwards, India which
has been very active in finding and manufacturing a vaccine has already
approved two COVID-19 vaccines. India has also started to send the vaccine to
other developing countries as a goodwill gesture. Even some developed countries
have sent/are sending requests to India for the vaccine. China is also said to
have developed its own vaccine from Sinovac and Sinopharm, two companies in
China. In the case of China’s pharma exports, while there were doubts about
purchasing medical equipment and pharmaceutical items from China by the
advanced countries, exports of China of these items did not suffer.
The third major
opportunity for India is in Digitization with WFH becoming a lasting feature
and social distancing likely to continue for some more time. Indian IT
industry has shown the way even during difficult times and has not only adapted
to the changes quickly but even helped other sectors to adjust to the new
normal of greater digitization.
Another major
opportunity for India is the possibility of higher trade opportunities from
QUAD and other developed countries as there are indications of trade
diversion by many trading partners of India from China to India. For this,
strategic trade alliances may be needed. In the merchandise goods sector, the
opportunities are in the three ‘E’s’, Electrical, Electronic and Engineering,
as is evident from the indications of trade diversion of items under codes 84
and 85.
Investment
including Export related Investment is another
possible opportunity with countries shifting lock, stock and barrel their
production bases from China. Already in some sectors, such developments are
visible as in the case of the interest shown by a Taiwanese company in
Footwear, Japanese companies in the marine sector, etc.
Sector-Specific
Opportunities
In the Agri and
related sector, there is greater demand for fresh vegetables, non-basmati rice,
wellness food items like spices including turmeric, chilli, organic products
and nutracereals like millets.
In the textiles
and clothing sector, there is a huge demand for PPE kits like
gowns, respirators, face masks, safety-footwear harnesses, eye protection gear
and gloves. India has completely revamped its production of PPE kits.
Restrictions on the import of Textiles and Clothing from China by the USA on
products made from Xinjiang cotton on account of forced labour practices is an
opportunity India should use particularly when US-China trade tensions have
aggravated. The growing demand for MMF though not a consequence of the pandemic
is another opportunity. The recent measure in Budget 2021-22 of rationalizing
customs duty on raw material imports for manmade textiles could help in this
regard.
In the case of
Engineering goods where India is a close competitor to China,
COVID-19 has provided an opportunity as developed countries are moving away
from the single-sourcing model. In the light of COVID-19, engineering goods
like medical instruments, pharmaceutical machinery, agricultural machinery,
automotive engineering, metals and machinery, electronic parts and components
offer considerable opportunities.
The
pharmaceutical sector is one sector where COVID-19 has opened up
many opportunities for India including the supply of vaccines. Producers of
Pharmaceuticals of different countries, who hitherto sourced inputs from China
are trying to shift their sourcing to other countries. China dominates global
supplies of API with a 40% share and India can be a preferred supplier for
certain products. Domestic producers and exporters, dependent on China for
sourcing are also trying to source domestically.
In the case of
the electronics Sector, COVID-19 has resulted in a ‘New Normal’ with
greater use of ICT benefitting the electronics hardware sector. Opportunities
are there in telemedicine, WFH devices, networking devices, broadband services,
medical electronics, automated products, DIY devices and even defense goods.
In the case of
leather and footwear exports, there are opportunities for attracting
investments with foreign companies like a Taiwanese footwear company evincing
interest in investing in India.
In the case of
the gems and jewellery sector, COVID-19 has provided exporters and
manufacturers a unique opportunity to digitally transform the sector. India is
already one of the largest sourcing partners of the US for gold jewellery
products. The recent withdrawal of the preferential treatment to Hongkong by
the US can provide a level playing field for India and thus open up further
opportunities in the US market.
In the case of
marine products, opportunities have come to India with
investors shifting base from China.
In the case of
the IT-BPM sector, COVID-19 has opened up opportunities galore
in different digital products needed for digital transformation. The emerging
tech space areas are high-speed infrastructures like multi-cloud/hybrid-cloud,
virtual workspace technologies, high availability systems, platformization of
services, technology convergence, etc.; Data, AI, IoT, and cybersecurity, etc.
Despite the downturn in some traditional labour-intensive, less digitized
industries such as manufacturing, retail, travel, hospitality, etc., the IT sector
will be impacted minimally as demand is increasing in areas like
Pharmaceuticals and Government and heavyweight sectors for which IT has become
more critical like Telecom and Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
(BFSI). The new normal of WFH has led to greater demand for computers and many
companies are replacing PCs with laptops. This provides an opportunity to the
IT and Electronics sector.
In the case of
shipping services, COVID-19 has clearly shown that strengthening
the Indian shipping sector for India’s trade is very important. This is an area
where the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ policy is very relevant as opportunities are
there not only for the export of shipping services but also for domestic
shipping and also saving foreign exchange. The recent announcement in Budget
2021-22 of launching a scheme to promote flagging of merchant ships in India by
providing subsidy support to Indian Shipping companies in global tenders
floated by Ministries and CPSEs is likely to help.
In the case of
tourism, the worst-hit sector by COVID-19, opportunities
could come only when the COVID-19 vaccine is successful and the pandemic
situation eases. But even when normalcy returns, social distancing norms,
safety, sanitisation, digital transactions, etc. will be more important. The fortunes
of the tourism sector are also linked to the fortunes of the aviation sector
where the passenger flight services, are allowed now by India only under the
‘Air Bubble’ arrangements.
Telecom and
broadband sector has emerged as the invisible force behind
keeping the citizens connected during the pandemic. The sharp rise in the use
of digital tools, including video-conferencing, cloud-computing and electronic
payment puts the telecommunications sector in the focus in facilitating this
‘new normal’. Broadbanding is going to be the next sunrise sector. While mobile
Broadband served the immediate WFH needs, with growing traffic and reverse
migration to villages, fixed broadband becomes important. Thus, there is great
scope domestically for broadband infrastructure and services. In the case of
exports, India can become the Fibre manufacturing capital of the world.
Trade Strategies
and Policy Suggestions in the context of COVID-19 Pandemic
These can be seen
under the following headings.
1)
General Trade Strategies
Logistics related Issues and Policy suggestions
·
Increase in Sea Freight: The Sea Freights have increased by 30-100% due to COVID-19 in the last
few months resulting in Indian Businesses becoming less competitive than those
of China. There is a need to resolve this issue at the earliest.
·
Unrelated Shipping Charges: Shipping Companies are charging and recovering various unrelated and
unregulated costs that are not relevant to the services provided. Many of these
charges are far in excess of those mentioned on their websites and there
is no uniformity in such charges. There is a need for regulations to ensure
that all such charges to be levied and recovered at the destination port should
be mentioned on the B/L as done by Sri Lanka & Bangladesh. Recently the
Indian Government has also decided to regulate freight charges as per the new
provisions in the draft Merchant Shipping Bill 2020 on similar lines. This could
atleast lead to greater transparency.
·
Shortages of Containers for Export Shipments: Booking and
Container shortages at ports like Mundra Port have created chaos amongst Indian
exporters over the last few months. Getting the container booking from the
Shipping lines is a problem these days as demand is much higher than the supply
of container bookings. While it is necessary to streamline things at Mundra and
other Ports, the long-term solution however is to increase the capacity of
Indian Shipping for India’s Trade.
·
Short-time Validity of Container Bookings: Shipping lines are
issuing the container bookings with very short time validity (only for 3 days
from the date of booking) for the vessels sailing minimum after 2 weeks with
gate opening 7 days before the vessel sailing date. If the Indian exporters
wait for container lifting, loading and delivering to the container yard
considering gate opening dates of the vessel, then the booking expires and the
shipping companies do not issue revalidated booking once booking expires. So
the Indian exporters have no choice other than to lift the container in advance
and bear the additional charges by the shipping lines which makes exports less
competitive.
·
Issue of Demurrage Charges at Airports: Post lockdown, a
lot of export shipments, are lying at various Indian Airports as they could not
fly out of India since Govt. of India had stopped all International flights. On
such export shipments, huge demurrage has been incurred and the Airlines are
not ready to pay the demurrage charges to the terminal operator. While for
shipping, demurrage charges have been waived 100% for Exim trade through the
port, in the case of aviation, half of the demurrage charges were waived by the
Indian government in April 2020.
·
Need for Automation and Digitisation: While India’s Ports
and Shipping are way behind many developed countries in automation, COVID-19
has highlighted the need for speedy action on this front. One suggestion in
this regard is the use of RFID tags for easy tracking and identification of
export consignments along with automation of logistic clearances and payment
systems.
Major Foreign
Trade, Tax-Related and Other Issues and Policy Suggestions
·
Relaxation in Export Obligation for import
under Advance Authorisation. Exporters are
facing issues with the utilization of the input which they have
imported duty-free under Advance Authorization for export orders, as
per the provisions of the Advance Authorization. In situations
of order cancellation, the exporter is faced with the unintentional inventory
pile up as also burdened with failure to fulfil
the Export Obligation which would, in turn, require the exporter to refund the
customs duty saved on the value of imports, along with interest. A one-time relaxation in
fulfillment of Export Obligation may be given to exporters who have imported
the inputs but their export order has been cancelled due to COVID -19.
·
Issue of
Cancellation of Export orders or delay in payment: Due to COVID-19, many overseas buyers
cancelled or postponed confirmed export orders and are also holding back or
indefinitely deferring the payment for goods already shipped/ready-to-ship and
asking for hefty discounts. Also, several buyers are filing for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy. Buyers are also not making payments for goods where delivery has already
taken place and existing shipments are on hold either on ships or are
lying in the warehouses/factories/ports. The exporters have already claimed
Duty Drawback for the shipped goods. Now, if the Buyer does not pay
for the shipped goods, exporters have to repay the Duty Drawback with
interest. So there is a need to consider a one-time waiver from the refund
of Drawback claimed against shipments made from November 2019 till atleast
March-April 2020.
·
Reforms in ECGC
Insurance: Reforms in ECGC
can be considered like the immediate implementation of NIRVIK (Niryat Rin Vikas Yojana) Scheme
announced in Budget 2020-21; expanding the terms of ECGC to consider COVID-19
as a “force majeure” situation; reducing the time taken by the ECGC for approval of export limits on the “buyer” which is
rather long to not more than 2 weeks; reducing the time taken to resolve/settle
the claims to not more than 2 weeks; and increasing ECGC cover
outstandings for MSME exporters from 80% to 90%.
·
Suggestions related to Payment norms and Exports Benefits: COVID-19 has led
to instability in the World as there are business disruptions in every country.
While exporters are facing problems in collections, buyers are requesting them
to relax the payment norms. But Indian companies are bound by the RBI
guidelines to collect the money from the buyers. Therefore, the Indian
government could relax the collection norms for exporters and also allow
exporters to provide additional discounts to the buyers.
·
Speedy Finalization of Rates under the RODTEP scheme: The RoDTEP
(Remission of Duties or Taxes on Export Products) scheme has come into effect
from 1 January 2021. This is WTO compliant as it is product-based and a fully
automated refund module will be created for manufacturing/service sectors
through Form GST RST-01. It will be strictly based on input taxes paid. While
the scheme has been implemented, the rates have to be notified.
·
Resolving the issue of flagging exporters as RISKY Exporters: In GST, if the
exporter has paid the IGST through utilizing the input-output credit which is
availed fraudulently through GST return, the exporter is identified as a ‘risky
exporter’. Once an exporter is classified as ‘Risky’, their IGST/ DBK,
etc. are stuck which causes liquidity problems. Also, their consignments are
subject to 100% examination which increases transaction costs, shipment delays
and possible loss of business. So, a lot of care and caution is needed in
tagging exporters as Risky exporters.
·
CAROTAR 2020 and Faceless Assessment. CBDT has recently
issued customs (Administration of Rules of origin under Trade Agreements) Rules
2020 making it incumbent upon the importer to possess sufficient information as
regards the manner in which the country of origin (CoO) criteria including the
regional value content and product-specific criteria specified in the RoO in the
Trade Agreement are satisfied. The new rules have posed challenges, as foreign
suppliers are not likely to share confidential information like the process,
origin, profit margin, etc.
·
Trade
Fairs/Exhibitions: To provide support for virtual buyer-seller meets and virtual
exhibitions, the MAI scheme needs to be modified.
·
Identifying NPAs/Stressed Assets: The Special
Mention Accounts (SMA) was introduced in 2014 by RBI to identify those accounts
that have the potential to be NPAs/ Stressed Assets. There is a need for
suitable relaxation at present, given the fact that COVID-19 could have turned
many healthy investments/loans to NPAs.
·
Issue of Forward Contracts: Many Exporters have lost huge amounts
by booking forward contracts. There is a need to consider waiving the penalty
on forward covers imposed by certain banks.
2)
Some Major Sector-Specific Trade Strategies and Policy Suggestions
Agriculture and Related Exports
·
Addressing logistics and transportation issues is important as
many agricultural items are perishable or have limited shelf life. Particularly
high freights due to COVID-19 is affecting Rice exports.
·
Addressing new restrictions in major markets like quota
restrictions in Indonesia for Meat and Rice products, high import duty for
Mango pulp/puree, etc. in the European market, health certificates for green
chillies by EU, TRQ for sugar exports to the USA, and new sanitary norms by
Middle East countries on Rice imports from India, intended to be at par with EU
norms.
·
Tapping the potential for ‘Safe Spices’ exports with
sustainably produced MRL (Maximum Residue Level) compliant spices.
Textiles and Garments Sector
·
Support for Automation and Digitisation to tap the
opportunities in medical-related textiles and garments.
·
Making India a Production Centre for the
World: India has the potential to be a production centre and sourcing
base for the World. The recent measure in Budget 2021-22 of launching Mega
Investment Textiles Parks in addition to PLI scheme could help in ‘Make in
India’.
Engineering Exports
·
Tapping the potential for a shift in global supply chains from
China by
attracting foreign companies shifting base - lock stock and barrel - from
China and diversifying India’s sourcing destination beyond China.
·
Moving towards local sourcing by assisting in infrastructure,
building mega industrial units as in China and also focusing on the existing
engineering clusters in India.
Pharmaceuticals Exports
·
Facilitating investors shifting base from China and becoming an
alternative sourcing destination for Pharmaceuticals. For this, more API
(Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) manufacturing units and more spend on
R&D and new inventions is needed.
·
Becoming the COVID-19 Vaccine manufacturer and provider of the
World as
India is one of the few countries which can provide vaccine to the whole World
at reasonable prices.
Electronics including ICT Hardware Exports
·
Becoming the global hub of Electronics repair services by allowing
seamless exports of spares, allowing global stores and dispatch centres to the
World to be set up in India, addressing e-waste due to imported non-repairable
units, allowing imports for repairs of products manufactured in India beyond 5
years, etc.
·
Making Electronic Component Hub a reality, by allowing component hubs
to freely import and export at whatever market price at the moment when
buy-sale happens and calculating duty at the time of dispatch to DTA instead of
the time of import.
·
A consortium of component companies, design companies, R&D
companies and manufacturing companies could also be created to enable the
Electronics System Design & Manufacturing (ESDM) sector to move together in
one direction and create more opportunities for everyone.
·
Expediting roll out of National Policy on Electronics 2019 like SPECS, PLI
and EMC 2.0.
·
Developing a Star Rating for all tech products indicating the percentage
of indigenization as a guide to the Indian consumer on the lines of the green
label.
·
Making India a production centre for the World in the light of
realignment of GVCs by various policies like allowing for a blanket 7 years instead of
the 5 years for imports for the repair of all non-industrial and 10 years for
industrial products; allowing the second-best option of direct connects
to key ports linked to global electronic supply chains as India does not have and
unlikely to have Transit hubs in the near future; and supporting global R&D
centers to engage with Indian manufacturing ecosystem, from design to
manufacturing cycle in areas like PCB design, Injection molding and metal
forming for electronic subsystems.
·
Tapping the Potential Areas: India has excelled in Software and now is
the time to reboot the Electronics hardware sector. There are many potential
areas and opportunities in the electronics hardware sector like telemedicine,
health tech, work from home products, medical electronics, networking devices,
rural BPO and IoT based support activities. do-it-yourself kits, no-touch
devices, quick design skills, homeland security, surveillance, environment-friendly
products like e-vehicles; 5G and broadband, and Industry 4.0. India can also
focus on the Design & Packaging of electronics and components like mould
designs / mould engineering which will also reduce dependence on China.
·
Identifying high volume products – High volume products include Set
Top Box, Education Tablet, Smart Meter, Handheld POS, Wifi Router, Enterprise
Switch & Router, Ultrasound M/c, Blood Count M/c. For these, a Chip to
Product Programme could be launched. This will result in India having 70% +
value addition in Indian Products within a short span of say, 18 months.
Leather and Footwear Exports
·
Having a dedicated cargo ship to the US atleast once a
week as at present transportation time from India to West Coast of USA takes
55-60 days as the ship goes to many ports before reaching the final
destination, whereas China’s dedicated ships take only 14 days.
·
Creating Plug-and-Play model clusters (ready to use
factory sheds) with all required infrastructure and support services like
testing labs, design studios, etc. and establishing good Port connectivity.
Chemicals Exports
·
Setting up a dedicated Industrial Park for Dyes and Dye
Intermediates.
·
Handholding the Chemicals industry especially on
the environment front.
Gems and Jewellery Exports
·
Extending the time limit for completion of exports in COVID times
as exporters are unable to complete exports within 90 days of import of Gold
for exports. Earlier before 2017, it was 120 days.
·
Extension of time for payment of the gold loan by G&J exports and also
forwarding the fixed value of gold for the loans as cashflow is affected due to
Covid-19 and repayment of loan may fall.
Marine Exports
·
Addressing the Antibiotic residue issue in the case of
India’s exports to the EU and Japan and other trade barriers. The trade
barriers specifically applied to India needs to be negotiated.
·
Making Technological changes like modernizing fishing harbours to
international standards, online trade platform for direct marketing of
aquaculture products to avoid middlemen, etc.
·
Making India a production centre for the world by measures like
R&D support, strengthening the mechanism of traceability and residue-free
product, framing suitable land leasing policies, fast track clearance of SIP
(Sanitary Import Permit), and strengthening cold chain infrastructure, etc.
·
Value Addition: Currently the share of value-added products coming under
chapter-16 is only 6%, whereas the share of competing nations like Thailand is
64% and Vietnam 26%. Many major seafood trading firms are interested to shift
their value addition/reprocessing works to India. There is a need to have
Business Incubation Centres for Value Addition, better exploration of the air
connectivity for exports and upskilling of workers. The proposed PLI Scheme by
NITI Aayog for incentivizing the processing units for increasing production of
Value Added Products in the fisheries sector needs to be considered.
IT-BPM Sector Exports
·
Addressing requests by clients for deferred payments, discounts
and reduction in billing rates to reduce their costs with an open mind
without invoking any contract breach grievance or mandating services purchase
by clients.
·
Embracing the new normal of greater digitization, and new
practices like
remote connectivity, working from home, collaboration and better leverage of
technology like high-speed secure infrastructure, multi-cloud/hybrid cloud,
virtual workspace technologies, high availability systems, platformization of
services, technology convergence, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of
Things (IoT) and cybersecurity.
·
Need for a shift in the focus of IT sector from increasing IT
sector exports to overall exports with the help of IT. For example, the IT
sector can help other sectors like the construction sector in facing the crisis
with concepts like the construction of houses with a digitally enabled
workplace, digitally enabled smart and cheap houses in villages suitable for
WFH and providing Broadband in all villages.
·
Piggybacking IT hardware on software to make India a
composite provider of IT.
·
Streamlining ‘Blended’ Workplace policies for OSPs, firms
in SEZs and STPIs with work equipment regulatory norms as suggested by the
NASSCOM.
Shipping Services
COVID-19 has
taught a lesson to depend more on Indian Ships. The facts like the
foreign lines hiking freight charges during the crisis, shortage of containers
for India’s trade and short validity of container bookings by foreign lines-all
point out to the crying need for strengthening the capacity of Indian ships for
India’s trade. Further, Indian Ships are also ageing with the average age of a
ship at 14.4 years, compared to 9 years in Japan,12.2 years in China and 12 in
Singapore. With prices for ships falling
in August 2020 (YoY) by 3.7 % for liner vessels and by 2.5 % for Tankers and
Bulk Carriers, this could be an opportune time to strengthen Indian Shipping.
Some policy suggestions to strengthen Indian shipping include formulating an
Integrated and focused Maritime policy; setting up a Maritime Development fund
(MDF) which has been approved by the Committee of Secretaries and needs
traction to make long term funds available to help the acquisition of ships; reversing
the recent contentious regulations favoring foreign flag vessels like the
orders permitting foreign flag vessels to transport Exim laden containers, Agri
products, horticulture, fisheries, animal husbandry commodities and fertilizers
between two or more Indian ports without obtaining a license from DG, Shipping;
and strict implementation of the recent Public procurement policy which states
that orders below Rs. 200 crore have to be floated among Indian companies only.
Strongly opposing
the contentious EU-ETS which intends to bring shipping into a regional market-based
measure.
Tourism Sector
·
Setting up a Tourism COVID-19 Fund to enable Tourism
businesses to support their employees and their operating cost.
·
Multi-Year moratorium of both interest and Principal for loans and
making available credit against forex earnings for both tour operators and
hotels.
·
Restoring Air connectivity to tourist source countries. The present air
bubble arrangement of passenger flights needs to be gradually expanded taking
note of the safety considerations till normalcy returns.
·
Following Travel-friendly standardized quarantine policies which ensure
passengers are pre-tested at the point of embarkation as per WHO guidelines and
only the ones with positive symptoms are quarantined and not all incoming
travelers.
·
Following a policy of “Revenge Tourism” as done by China
by encouraging domestic tourism in a big way to make good the loss in international
tourism.
Telecom and Digital Communications Sector
(i) Issues and
Policies related to Domestic Manufacturing
·
Implementing the National Digital Communications Policy expeditiously by
continuing the passion and focus that was seen during the lockdown following
the pandemic.
·
Rationalisation of statutory levies and taxes viz LF, SUC, GST,
Input Tax Credits, etc. as India’s spectrum prices are very high compared to other
countries.
·
Optimum Spectrum Pricing as the Government was unable to sell spectrum
in its last auction due to high price.
·
GST related: Refund/adjustment of accumulated GST input credit of over Rs.
35,000 crores or at least allowing the GST input credit to be used as
collateral against loans from banks/financial institutions.
·
Liberalization of Satcom for remote areas to be speedily connected as
currently only 20-25% of our mobile towers are connected by fibre which is
woefully below global standards. Lack of fibre connectivity can be overcome by liberalizing
Satellite connectivity. The announcement to this effect by the government needs
to be converted into a policy.
·
Enhancement of Scope of IP1 registration to include
sharing of both active and passive infrastructure instead of only passive
infrastructure as at present. This will help fiberisation, a key requirement of
4G and 5G.
·
Creating and manufacturing strong Digital Communications Network by
rationalization of Right of Way (RoW), Fiber First initiative of Government,
open public Wi-fi networks and opening E&V bands.
·
Support for Startups & MSMEs: Besides setting
up a fund for Telecom Startups/MSMEs carved out of Startup India fund, there is
a need to relax restrictive conditions of financial schemes like minimum 50
employees, minimum turnover of Rs. 10-60 crore as laid down by SIDBI and also
restrictive tender conditions as in the case of a recent BSNL tender including
very high eligibility criteria.
(ii)Issues and Policy
Suggestions related to Exports
·
A strong Export-oriented
strategy in the light of shifting global supply chains by inviting
global OEMs to invest in setting up units in India and also setting up global
manufacturing hubs even if it is out of India in global locations as done by
China.
·
Making India the Fibre manufacturing Capital of the World by Foreign Trade
Policy support in the form of 10% BCD and removal of any relaxations for FTAs, incentivizing
design-based and complex manufacturing of fibre by ensuring the quality preform
is created in the country, etc.
·
A strategy combining manufacturing of optical fiber and exports
coupled with providing Broadband services through project exports which can be key
to future export growth.
·
Other Telecom manufacturing like WiFi and backhaul equipment, digital
transmission and distribution equipment, Satellite terminals and handsets, etc.
Indian software companies can be leveraged effectively to get into product
design, support network-based software, firmware, OS and App software.
·
Preparing for 6G by kickstarting early-phase R&D of 6G and
Auxiliary Technologies. A 6G High-level Forum should be formed. Substantial and
sustained contribution in the standardization, as well as Standard Essential
Patents (SEPs), is needed for India to become self-reliant in 6G.
3)
Strategies for
greater supply chain integration and relevance of GVC integration
COVID-19 has
shattered not just the global value chains (GVCs) but the supply chains
themselves, thus revealing the fragility of the modern supply chains. National and
Multinational companies faced an initial supply shock due to the lockdown and
other restrictions like strict sanitisation, etc. This was followed by a demand
shock as country after country forced people to stay at home. Businesses and
individuals found it difficult to procure basic products and materials, thus
exposing the fragility of the modern supply chain system.
Recent data from
Tradeshift, suggests the effects of the initial shock may continue to linger
for the coming months. In China, domestic and international trade transactions
suffered a week-on-week drop of 56% beginning mid-February 2020. The United
States, United Kingdom, and Europe followed suit, with a combined initial drop
of 26% at the beginning of April 2020, and a continuing decline of 17% in late
April 2020. Furthermore, trade has flattened in every region affected by the
lockdown. Overall weekly transactions on the Tradeshift platform since March
9th were down by an average of 9.8%, compared to pre-lockdown figures, with a
pronounced decline in invoices and orders since the end of March 2020. However,
in Q3 2020, Trade activity picked up. Transaction volumes across the Eurozone
and in the US have rebounded in Q3 and are approaching pre-lockdown levels
while the UK activity remains depressed. Trade activity in China also failed to
recover to its pre-COVID-19 levels and remains very volatile.
Two side effects of the contractions in global trade emerged
during the lockdown.
·
One is that it takes longer to settle an invoice, reversing a
previous trend of faster payments. According to Tradeshift’s data, businesses
took an average of 36.7 days to settle an invoice in 2019, whereas in the first
quarter of 2020, average payment terms have risen 1.7% to 37.4 days.
·
Secondly, the lack of orders going through the supply chain was
building up to another tidal wave with new orders slowing and invoices dropping
off.
For India in the
case of global supply chains, freight cost increased and supplies were also
affected as China was the key supplier. However, being less globalized than
other advanced countries and having a large domestic source of supply could
have helped India.
India’s domestic
supply chains were also affected due to lockdowns in different states,
logistics problems and reverse migration to villages. More expenditure was
incurred at all points of the global chain. The squeeze in cash flows affected
the MSMEs which form a sizeable portion of India’s exports and Manufacturing.
Diversifying the
supply chains, instead of relying only on China is a hard lesson to be learnt
from the crisis. While countries like India came out with a self-reliance policy
(Atmanirbhar Bharat), developed countries came out with China+1 sourcing plans.
A number of countries also started moving portions of their supply chains back
home. While the import substitution model may not be the solution,
globalization with a single-sourcing model is risky. Multiple sourcing or China
+1 or 2 along with domestic sourcing wherever possible could be the ‘New
Reality’.
Besides diverse
sourcing, digitization will be the key to building stronger, smarter
supply chains and ensuring a lasting recovery.
India needs to
act fast to attract the supply chains moving away from China while creating
supply chains for its products both domestically and in friendly countries or
in the region.
4)
Strategies and Policies Related to Trade Diversion and
Self-Reliance
One of the major
impacts of COVID-19 on World Trade was the disruptions in supply chains. While China was
the major sourcing destination for most of the advanced countries and also
India, COVID-19 in China and lockdown led to supply disruptions from the
Chinese side. The public sentiment in most of the countries was against China
which is supposed to result in Trade diversion away from China.
While China’s
export sector recovered quickly. India’s export growth continued to be
negative even in November 2020, though in December 2020 it was marginally positive.
Similarly, China’s Services export growth was positive in July and September
2020, while India’s Services export growth has been continuously negative since
April 2020.
However, in the
imports of some major items (at the 2 digit level) by major markets from China
and India, there are indications of Trade Diversion. For example, US
imports from China of Electrical Machinery and equipment (Code 85) was negative
in 2019 and all 4 quarters from 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q2. But US imports of these
items registered positive growth from India not only in 2019 but in all 4
quarters from 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q2 with high positive growth in 2020 Q1 of 78% and growth of 18% in 2020 Q2. This could
be an indication of trade diversion of US imports of Electrical Machinery from
China to India. Only in another major item, Pharmaceutical products (Code 30)
growth in imports of US from India and China were both positive in 2020 Q2 with
higher positive growth of 46.6% from China compared to 8.6% from India. This is
one major US import item which had positive growth from both China and India in
2019 and almost all quarters from 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q1. While the share of China
in US imports is higher than that of India for total and also Code 84 and 85
imports, the share of India is higher in the case of Code 30 imports at 6.2% in
October 2020 compared to 1.6% of China. Similarly, in the case of
Australia’s imports from India, Apparel and Clothing, both knitted and
non-knitted were showing better growth performance than Australia’s imports
from China.
Further in the US
imports from India at the 4 digit level with a share of 0.5% and above there
are some items where there are indications of trade diversion. For example, Telephone
sets, etc. (Code 8517) has a high share of 12.8% in US imports from China,
while its share in US imports from India is only 0.5%. But in the case of this
item, growth in US imports from India has turned positive in 2019 Q4 and become
very high in 2020 Q1 and 2020 Q2 at 192.3% and 173.8% respectively, while
growth in US imports from China of this item has been negative in 2019 and all
the 4 quarters 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q1. Similarly, in the case of imports of Engines
and motors, etc. (Code 8412), growth in US imports from India has been positive
in 2019 and all 4 quarters 2019 Q3 – 2020 Q2 with very high growth in some
quarters, whereas growth in the US imports of this item from China was negative
in 2019 and low or negative in the 4 quarters 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q2.
There are also
some items in the US imports which have a share of 0.5% and above in its
imports from China, but not from India. Among these
items, for some items like Automatic data-processing machine (Code 8471) with a
share of 9.64% in US imports from China, Electrical transformers (Code
8504), Monitors and Projectors (Code
8528) and Insulated including enabled or anodized wire (Code 8544), US imports
from India has suddenly shown high positive growth in most of the 4 quarters
from 2019 Q3 to 2020 Q2 indicating some shift in US imports from China to
India. In the case of Australia’s imports from India also, in Telephone sets,
etc. (Code 8517), import growth from India has been high during 2019 Q4 and
very high in 2020 Q1 and 2020 Q2.
Thus, there are
many items in Code 84 and 85 where India also has a competitive advantage but
not a high market share like China. Some extra effort by India to push exports
of these items to countries like the US and Australia can pay rich dividends.
India also needs
to shift from its overdependence on China for imports and also aim at local
sourcing. The policy of ‘Atma Nirbhar Bharat’ of India is one such
initiative.
Meanwhile, China
seems to continue its liberal imports policy from developed countries, with its imports
in 2020 Q2 growing by 5.7% from the USA, 0.1% from Japan, 1.3% from QUAD (3),
5.7% from Singapore and even by 5% from India.
So while
opportunities for trade diversion from China should be tapped and local
sourcing explored, liberal import policies with major trading partners
including forming strategic trading blocks with groups like QUAD could help
India. But this needs to be done with great speed.
5)
Strategies and Policies to face Emerging Trade Restrictions and
Market Access Challenges
Trade
restrictions by countries including India have been increasing over the years.
However, since the onset of COVID-19 many trade-facilitating measures were also
taken. The trade measures of G20 are divided into (1) Regular non-Covid
related measures and (2)
Measures taken in the context of COVID-19. As per the WTO’s latest biannual
monitoring report on trade measures, during the period 16 October 2019 to 15
May 2020, G-20 economies implemented 154 new trade and trade-related measures,
95 of them trade facilitating and 59 trade restrictive. Of these measures,
93 (about 60%) were linked to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Of these 65 facilitated
trade and 28 restricted trade. Other than COVID-19 related measures, 61 trade
and trade-related measures were implemented, of which 30 are trade
facilitating.
Most of the
regular trade remedy actions are related to anti-dumping initiations
followed by CVD initiation.
Most of the trade
measures in the merchandise sector introduced as a result of COVID-19 by different
countries including India were medical-related or agricultural items. There
were temporary restrictions or even liberalization in the case of
medical-related items. Some of the measures in the merchandise trade sector
have sunset clauses and are temporary. The ones which may last long, need to be
negotiated.
In the services
sector, the major restrictive measures introduced as a result of COVID-19 were related to
curbing takeovers or acquisitions of local companies by foreign companies,
particularly Chinese companies; and restrictive visa measures by the US. But
most of the other measures were liberalizing particularly in the financial
sector. India needs to emulate the measures related to broadband services to
tap this potential sector. Even China’s measure of providing services to
facilitate FDI by the different local Departments of Commerce is worth
emulating.
While many of the
COVID-19 related restrictive measures may be phased out, the ones likely to
remain need to be negotiated by India. FTAs with major strategic partners could
also help in tackling restrictive trade measures.
6)
Strategies and Policies related to FTAs in the wake of COVID-19
crisis
Studies have
shown that most of India’s FTAs have been more beneficial to its FTA partners
than India. There are also examples of some FTA partners giving more
concessions to countries with which it has other FTAs more than nullifying any
concessions given to India by them.
The strategic
regional forum of India with QUAD countries could be taken forward to the level
of some form of economic and trade grouping. There are
indications of Trade diversion from China to India by these countries. India
needs to quickly utilize the opportunity to see that Trade diversion to India
coupled with Investment diversion to India becomes a reality as many foreign
investors are planning to move lock, stock and barrel from China. The sector-specific issues/ experiences
regarding India’s FTAs differs between sectors.
On the lines of
zero-budgeting, a careful but quick review of existing FTAs along with
concluding new useful FTAs with major trading partners of India is important.
Negotiations in Indo-US, Indo-UK and Indo-EU FTAs should be brought to a
logical conclusion at the earliest. If necessary India should not hesitate to
terminate some less useful FTAs or make them more useful for India atleast at
the time of renewal.
7)
COVID-19 and the role of Trade-related Institutions like the WTO
COVID-19 has led
to a debate as to whether there would be a Bretton Woods like situation and
what will be the role of existing International Institutions like WTO, G-20,
etc. With some signs of the crisis subsiding, the initial talk of fundamental
reforms in International institutions seems to have subsided and the issue of
the formation of new institutions may be less relevant now. However, serious
thought needs to be given in the WTO, G20 and other Trade institutions to
emerging challenges like the following.
·
The first such issue is the growing digital trade in the wake of
social distancing, which will need a whole set of new rules. On the digital economy,
the G-20 leaders expressed their support for fostering an open, fair and
non-discriminatory environment and for protecting and empowering consumers
while addressing the challenges related to privacy, data protection, IPR and
security.
·
The second major issue is related to providing Health and Medical
supplies particularly the Vaccine to the World at a reasonable price. The usual principles of business or profit
motive will have to be given up for this purpose. World institutions need to
work to provide this at reasonable rates with only a small markup above costs.
Even ways to subsidise costs by International bodies can be worked out to make
it more philanthropic in nature. India has taken suo moto action in
shipping COVID-19 Vaccines free of cost to some countries as a goodwill
gesture.
·
The Issue of rights over IPRs, the third important issue follows
from the second issue. In fact, India’s and South Africa’s Joint Proposal at WTO was on
temporarily waiving the intellectual property and patent rights on COVID-19
vaccines, medical devices and protective kits in the TRIPS agreement. However
no consensus could be reached and deep divisions emerged, though it has been
retained in the Agenda for future negotiations.
However, with
countries moving from a single-sourcing model to China+1 model and
local/regional sourcing and more clamour for strategic FTAs, it is to be seen
whether the role and importance of multilateral trade institutions will remain
the same.
8)
Inter-Sectoral Linkages
COVID-19 has
brought to the fore the inter-sectoral linkages between some important sectors.
The pharmaceutical sector and healthcare sector is the first and
foremost such combination of merchandise and service sector with great
potential. Biotech and R&D are also related to this. India is competitive
in all these sectors and any export strategy should consider these sectors
together. The second major combination is hardware, software,
telecommunications and broadband sectors. India’s competence in software and
telecommunication services should now be extended to broadband services and IT
hardware where many initiatives have been taken. This will be a powerful growth
propelling combination where local sourcing and domestic supply chains can
develop promoting both domestic industry and exports. Telecommunications
equipment and Broadband Services can also be exported through Project exports.
Thus future trade
strategies and policies should not be formulated in silos but should be
combined policies considering the strong interlinkages between merchandise
sectors with merchandise sectors, merchandise sectors with services sectors and
services sectors with services sectors.
Implementation of
Strategies and Policies
The implementation
of the different strategies and policies can be broadly divided into (1)
policies for implementation in the nearer term (6 months to 1 year) to pick the
low hanging fruits and (2) policies for the longer time period (2 to 3 years).
Implementation in
the Nearer Term
These include most
of the logistics related issues and policies; many Foreign Trade and
Tax-related issues; GST and IT related issues; finance and banking related
issues/policies besides many sector-specific issues and policy suggestions.
Implementation in
the Longer time period
Policies for
implementation in the longer time period include digitization and Automation in
Indian Ports and Shipping and using RFID tags for easy tracking and
identification of export consignments; liberalization to the extent possible of
all procedures related to exports where government benefits/refunds are not
involved; strategies related to Greater Supply Chain integration; fundamental
reforms in International institutions; forming strategic Trading blocks like QUAD
and utilizing the opportunities of Trade diversion from China by assisting even
at local govt. levels; concluding useful and strategic FTAs along with
reviewing existing FTAs; marketing and Virtual Trade Fairs through reforms in
MAI; some sector-specific measures of a long term nature; and formulating a
comprehensive strategy in some areas like Pharmaceuticals, Healthcare,
Biotechnology and R&D where there are inter-sectoral linkages and adopting
a combined inter-sectoral strategy for Hardware, Software, Telecom and
Broadband services.
Conclusion
Thus there are a
bunch of issues and policy suggestions, some for the nearer term and some for
the longer term. However, COVID-19 is a constantly developing and changing
phenomenon and policymakers have to keep their eyes open and ears close to the
ground and make quick and suitable changes in policies and strategies.