India Disputes Memberships of Dispute Panels on Mobiles at WTO
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has set up two dispute
panels to examine complaints against India made by the European Union (EU) and
Chinese Taipei alleging that import duties imposed by the country on some
high-tech products, including mobile phones, violated its commitments under the
first IT Agreement (ITA-1).
“The panels will
decide on the scope of the ITA-1 of which India is a signatory and whether it
covered the high-tech items on which the country had recently imposed import
duties, including smart phones. The EU and Chinese Taipei, in their complaints,
had said that import duties were levied on the identified ICT items despite
commitments of keeping them at zero but India argued that the items were not
part of ITA-1,” a Geneva-based official said.
India’s objections
The three panellists were
appointed on August 31, by the Director-General of the WTO on the insistence of
the EU and Chinese Taipei. Interestingly, at the Dispute Settlement Body’s
meeting on August 28, India had raised objections to the EU and Chinese Taipei
“being in a rush’’ and seeking the DG’s involvement in setting up the panellists without due discussion between the parties.
Both the EU and Chinese Taipei had countered the
objection and pointed out that under the Dispute Settlement Undertaking, the
complaining members were entitled to ask the WTO DG to compose the panels since
they respected the minimum 20-day period for seeking an agreement with India on
the panellists before making their requests. The
exercise of this right is not conditional on the WTO secretariat proposing
first a slate of names, they added.
The DSB had agreed to set up the dispute panels in
June-end and July-end respectively, so the 20-day period requirement had been
met. Japan’s request for a panel on the same matter had also been approved by
the DSB.
“India would have wanted a greater say in the appointment
of the panellists as this is a sensitive case
involving the application of ITA-1 in the present scenario when technology is
so different. The interpretation on classification of items is key to this
dispute,” a Delhi-based trade expert said.
Identified items
The items identified by the EU and Taiwan as the ones
where import duties have been imposed by India going against the ITA-1 include
telephones for cellular networks or for other wireless networks, base stations,
machines for the reception, cameras, conversion and transmission or
regeneration of voice, images or other data, including switching and routing
apparatus etc.
India’s argument is that most of these items, in their
current smart avatars, did not exist in 1996, so were not covered under the
ITA-1. Since India was not party to ITA-2 subsequently negotiated, it had no
obligation of keeping import duties on such items at zero per cent and the
complaints went against its sovereignty.