India Withdraws a Proposed Law on Data Protection
· Internet companies like Meta and Google to get specific permission
for most uses of a person’s data.
· The bill was “a bad draft from the inception
· Two parallel universes — one for the private sector, where
it would apply with full rigor, and one for the government, where it is riddled
with exemptions.
·
India, the world’s fastest-growing
market for new internet users, has seen an explosion of personal data as millions
of new users have come online and started using hundreds of free and paid apps that
store the data.
A number of lawyers and experts say measures to safeguard
citizens online are badly needed, but the bill was criticized
by both privacy advocates and tech companies.
The Indian government on Wednesday, 3 August, 2022 unexpectedly
withdrew a proposed bill on data protection that a panel of lawmakers had been laboring
over for more than two years, saying it was working on a new law.
The abandoned legislation, Personal Data Protection Bill,
2019, would have required internet companies like Meta and Google to get specific
permission for most uses of a person’s data, and would have eased the process of
asking for such personal data to be erased. Countries worldwide have been adopting
such steps, including in Europe with the
General Data Protection Regulation.
But privacy advocates and some lawmakers complained that the
bill would have given the government excessively broad powers over personal data,
while exempting law enforcement agencies and public entities from the law’s provisions,
ostensibly for national security reasons.
Salman Waris, a lawyer at TechLegis in New Delhi who specializes in international technology
law, said the bill was “a bad draft from the inception,” because it would have given
the government broad powers to store, use and control the large amounts of data
it gathered on its citizens, including fingerprints and iris scans.
In a note to the parliamentary panel last year, Manish Tewari, an opposition
politician from the Indian National Congress party, said the bill created “two parallel
universes — one for the private sector, where it would apply with full rigor, and
one for the government, where it is riddled with exemptions.”
Tech companies were also wary, concerned that the proposed
legislation was going to increase their compliance burden and data storage requirements.
The bill, which included a rule that tech firms store certain
sensitive data about users in India only within the country, would have presented
new challenges for global tech giants looking to expand their services in India,
the world’s second-largest internet market after China, with more than half a billion
Indians online.
In recent years, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his governing
Bharatiya Janata Party have taken a series of steps to
rein
in tech companies — including by extending
the government’s powers of censorship over social media. Such rules allow the authorities
to demand that posts or accounts critical of them be
hidden from users in India, as with a recent
case involving Twitter. WhatsApp
has been told that it would be required to make some private
messages “traceable” to government agencies
if the government believed they involved issues of national security.
Yet a number of lawyers and experts say rules to safeguard
the privacy of citizens online and hold companies responsible for misusing or leaking
users’ personal data are badly needed. The abrupt withdrawal of the bill, by a government
that seldom bends to political opposition, surprised many Indians.
“It’s not about getting a perfect law, but a law at this point,”
said Apar Gupta, the executive director of the Internet
Freedom Foundation, a digital rights group based in New Delhi. “Each day lost causes
more injury and harm.”
The government’s explanation for withdrawing the bill was
that it had grown too complicated in the time that a panel of lawmakers had been
working on it. The committee set by the government “recommended 81 amendments in
a bill of 99 sections,” Ashwini Vaishnaw,
a minister for information technology, wrote on Twitter. “The bill has been withdrawn
and a new bill will be presented for public consultation.”
India, the world’s fastest-growing market for new internet
users, has seen an explosion of personal data as millions of new users have come
online and started using hundreds of free and paid apps that store the data.
The country’s push to better protect its data extends beyond
the scope of the data protection bill. For instance, India has required credit card
issuers and payment processors to store data on local transactions inside the country.
India has resisted the arguments of financial companies that
say setting up local data processing increased costs significantly and could set
a precedent for other countries to do the same, as well as potentially affect their
fraud monitoring.
In addition to its demand to store data locally, the country’s
central bank last year ordered all companies to purge debit and credit card details
beginning in 2022 to protect customers from being charged against their will.
That move caused frustration for businesses and customers
alike, many of whom either had their transactions declined or had to key in their
details once again.