DGAD Initiates Investigation on Belting
Fabric from China on Complaint of SRF
[F. No. 14/35/2016-DGAD dated 23 August 2017]
Subject: Anti-Dumping investigation concerning imports of “Belting Fabric”
originating in or exported from People’s Republic of China.
1. SRF Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the applicant) has filed an application before the Designated Authority
(hereinafter also referred to as the Authority) in accordance with the Customs Tariff
Act, 1975 as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the Act)
and Customs Tariff(Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty
on Dumped articles and for Determination of injury) Rules, 1995 as amended from
time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the Rules) for initiation of anti-
dumping investigation and imposition of anti-dumping duty concerning imports of
Belting Fabric (also referred to as Subject goods). The Countries concerned is People’s
Republic of China also referred to as the Subject Country.
2. And whereas, the Authority notes that sufficient prima facie evidence
of dumping of the subject goods, originating in or exported from the subject country,
causing ‘injury’ to the domestic industry and causal link between the alleged dumping
and ‘injury’ exists justifying initiation of an anti-dumping investigation. The
Authority hereby initiates an investigation into the alleged dumping, and consequent
injury to the domestic industry in terms of Rule 5 of the Rules, to determine the
existence, degree and effect of alleged dumping and to consider recommending an
amount of antidumping duty, which if levied, would be adequate to remove the ‘injury’
to the domestic industry.
Domestic Industry &
Standing
3. The petition has been
filed by SRF Limited. There are other producers whose names have been provided by
the petitioner along with their petition. The petitioner is not related to the exporters
or importers of the alleged dumped article. The petitioner has not imported the
dumped articles from China. The facts of the case, clearly
establish that petitioner should be considered eligible domestic industry within
the meaning of Rule 2(b).
4. The Authority holds
that the petitioner constitutes an eligible domestic industry in terms of Rule 2
(b) and satisfies the criteria of standing also in terms of Rule 5 (3) of the Rules
supra.
Product under consideration
a. The product under consideration
in the present petition is "Belting Fabric" The Rubberized Textile Fabric
(RTF) is technical textile fabric weighing less than 1500-gram square meter (GSM)
Or
b. More than 1500 GSM
and contains more than 50% by weight of textile material.
5. Belting Fabric is normally made of either nylon or polyester or a combination
thereof. It is a Rubberized Textile Fabric (RTF) or Conveyor Belt Fabric (CBF),
produced from various industrial yarns like Nylon 6 (N6), Nylon 66 (N66) and Polyester
Industrial Yarn (PIY). It is being produced and sold either as grey fabric or as
dipped fabric. In case of sale of grey fabric, the consumers may do dipping of the
fabric in-house before consumption of the product.
6. Belting Fabric is produced
in a large combination of raw material and construction, using different combination
of nylon & polyester yarn of different deniers. The product under consideration
is a woven fabric having length wise threads called “WARP” and width wise threads
called “WEFT”. The product under consideration is reinforcement material for manufacturing
of Conveyor Belts. Prominent mines and/or industries which use conveyor belts
are in the fields of Coal, Steel, Cement, Power etc.
7. The applicant has proposed
that based on raw material consumed and resultant end usage requirement in a Conveyor
Belt, various yarn varieties are used in the various combinations. Accordingly,
the product under consideration has been categorized into these product types:
|
Belt Fabric Types (Code) |
Type of yarn |
|
|
|
WARP |
WEFT |
|
a. NN(Nylon 6 and Nylon 6) |
N6 |
N6 |
|
b. EP(Polyester Industrial Yarn and Nylon 66) |
PIY |
N66 |
|
c. EE(Polyester Industrial Yarn and Polyester
Industrial Yarn) |
PIY |
PIY |
|
d. PP(Nylon 66 and Nylon 66) |
N66 |
N66 |
8. Authority has considered these product types for the purpose of the present
investigations.
9. The product under consideration
is classified under Chapter 59 of the Customs Tariff Act. The above classification
is indicative only.
Like Article
10. The applicant has
claimed that there is no known difference between the subject goods exported from
the subject country and that produced by the domestic industry. Subject goods produced
by the domestic industry and imported from the subject country are comparable in
terms of essential product characteristics such as physical & chemical characteristics,
manufacturing process & technology, functions & uses, product specifications,
pricing, distribution & marketing and tariff classification of the goods. Consumers
use the two interchangeably. The applicant has further claimed that the two are
technically and commercially substitutable and, hence, should be treated as ‘like
article’ under the Rules. Therefore, for the purpose of the present investigation,
the Authority treats the subject goods produced by the domestic industry in India
as
‘Like Article’ to the
subject goods being imported from the subject country.
Countries involved
11. The present investigation
is in respect of alleged dumping of Belting Fabric/Conveyer Belting Fabric from
China PR (subject country).
Normal Value
Non Market Economy (China PR)
12. Applicant has claimed
that China PR should be treated as a non-market economy and normal value in case
of China should be determined in accordance with para-7 and 8 of Annexure I of the
Rules. The applicant has claimed normal value for China PR on the basis of cost
of production in India, duly adjusted. In terms of Para 8 in Annexure 1 to the Rules
it is presumed that the producers of the subject goods in China PR are operating
under non market economy conditions. In view of the above non-market economy presumption
and subject to rebuttal of the same by the responding exporters from China PR, normal
value of the subject goods in China PR has been estimated in terms of Para 7 of
Annexure 1 to the Rules.
Export Price
13. The applicant has
determined ex-factory export price on the basis of transaction wise import data
procured from DGCI&S source and providing evidence and basis of adjustments
on account of ocean freight, marine insurance, inland freight, port expenses.
Dumping Margin
14. The comparison of
normal values with the ex-factory export price has been carried out, which shows
a significant dumping margin in respect of the subject goods exported by the subject
country.
Injury and Causal Link
15. The petitioner has
furnished evidence regarding injury due to alleged dumping due to increased imports
in absolute terms and relative to production and consumption in India, price depression,
price underselling and adverse impact on profitability, return on capital employed,
and cash flow of the domestic industry. There is sufficient prima facie evidence
of the ‘injury’ being suffered by the domestic industry caused by alleged dumped
imports from the subject countries to justify initiation of an antidumping Investigation.
Period of Investigation
(POI)
16. The period of investigation
proposed by the applicant is from 1st April 2016 to 31st
March 2017. The injury investigation period shall cover the periods 2013-14,
2014-15, 2015-16 and period of investigation.
Submission of information
17. The known exporters
in the subject countries, the Government of the subject countries through their
embassies in India, the importers and users in India known to be concerned with
the product are being addressed separately to submit relevant information in the
form and manner prescribed and to make their views known to the Authority at the
following address:
The Designated Authority,
Directorate General of Anti-Dumping & Allied Duties, Ministry of Commerce
& Industry, Department of Commerce
4th Floor, Jeevan Tara Building,
5 Parliament Street, New Delhi -110001.
18. Any other interested
party may also make its submissions relevant to the investigation in the prescribed
form and manner within the time limit set out below.
Time limit
19. Any information relating
to the present investigation and any request for hearing should be sent in writing
so as to reach the Authority at the address mentioned above not later than forty
days (40 Days) from the date of publication of this Notification. If no information
is received within the prescribed time limit or the information received is incomplete,
the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the facts available on record
in accordance with the Anti-dumping Rules.
20. All the interested
parties are hereby advised to intimate their interest (including the nature of interest)
in the instant matter and file their questionnaire responses and offer their comments
to the domestic industry’s application regarding the need to continue or otherwise
the Antidumping measures within 40 days from the date of initiation of this investigation.
Submission of Information
on Non-Confidential basis
21. In case confidentiality
is claimed on any part of the questionnaire’s response/ submissions, the same must
be submitted in two separate sets (a) marked as Confidential (with title, index,
number of pages, etc.) and (b) other set marked as Non Confidential (with title,
index, number of pages, etc.). All the information supplied must be clearly marked
as either “confidential” or “non-confidential” at the top of each page.
22. Information supplied
without any confidential marking shall be treated as non- confidential and the Authority
shall be at liberty to allow the other interested parties to inspect any such
non-confidential information. Two (2) copies of the confidential version and five
(05) copies of the non-confidential version must be submitted by all the interested
parties.
23. For information claimed
as confidential; the supplier of the information is required to provide a good cause
statement along with the supplied information as to why such Information cannot
be disclosed and/or why summarization of such information is not possible.
24. The non-confidential
version is required to be a replica of the confidential version with the confidential
information preferably indexed or blanked out/summarized depending upon the information
on which confidentiality is claimed. The non-confidential summary must be in sufficient
detail to permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information
furnished on confidential basis. However, in exceptional circumstances, parties
submitting the confidential information may indicate that such information is not
susceptible to summarization; a statement of reasons why summarization is not
possible must be provided to the satisfaction of the Authority.
25. The Authority may
accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of the nature of
the information submitted. If the Authority is satisfied that the request for confidentiality
is not warranted or the supplier of the information is either unwilling to make
the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized or summary
form, it may disregard such information.
26. Any submission made
without a meaningful non-confidential version thereof or without a good cause statement
on the confidentiality claim may not be taken on record by the Authority. The Authority
on being satisfied and accepting the need for confidentiality of the information
provided; shall not disclose it to any party without specific authorization of the
party providing such information.
Inspection of Public File
27. In terms of rule 6(7)
any interested party may inspect the public file containing non-confidential versions
of the evidence submitted by other interested parties.
Non-cooperation
28. In case any interested
party refuses access to and otherwise does not provide necessary information within
a reasonable period, or significantly impedes the investigation, the Authority may
declare such interested party as non- cooperative and record its findings on the
basis of the facts available to it and make such recommendations to the Central
Government as deemed fit.