LME Amends Margins, No more Out Cry in Ring
·
Metal Scrap Trade Begins, Alum Scrap
Contracts in the Offing
[Bureau of International Recycling,
Brussels, Press Release/12 March 2021]
The momentous changes presaged by The London Metal Exchange’s
discussion paper proposals is a matter of immense interest and relevance to the
global recycling industry where many of its
constituency are both active hedge users of the exchange, or even when not doing
so are daily impacted as contractual pricing bench mark users of the market, so
related Michael Lion, Chairman of the BIR International Trade Council (ITC) and
the resident host of BIR’s bi-monthly chat show, “The Challenge” in a special marquee
edition featuring the CEO of The London Metal Exchange (LME), Matthew Chamberlain.
Together with resident co-anchor contributors Mark Sellier of Global Metals Network and Murat Bayram of EMR, host Michael Lion engaged Matt Chamberlain in
series of crucial key issues emanating from the LME’s discussion paper on their
proposals.
A priority of intense interest and concern discussed at the
outset was the possibility of changing the margin valuation basis of the current
Contingent Variation Margin (CVM) methodology to a Realized Variation Margin (RVM)
basis, which could have significant and detrimental implications for trade hedgers,
who are heavily dependent on credit lines availability from their brokers, a point
that Murat Bayram emphasized was critical to the many
small and medium sized companies in the recycling community. Matt Chamberlain explained
both the respective rationales for retaining or changing the LME’s approach and
given the concerns expressed also by Mark Sellier in terms
of both accounting costs and credit line impairment militated convincingly in favor
of the current CVM method. In summary, Mr Lion noted that
the global metals industry was overwhelmingly of the view that maintaining the current
CVM margining model was crucial and Mr Chamberlain stated
that the LME was indeed still very open to the possibility of accepting that position.
Turning to the topic that Mr Lion
described as the headline-grabbing issue of the possible permanent closure of the
LME’s legendary and unique open outcry Ring, he noted that an understandable significant
sentimental emotion was attached to this issue, including himself as he and his
family have close involvement in the LME since the start of the last century, but
that any arguments in favor of maintaining the Ring must be based on persuasive
evidence that not only was this best for its users and members but in the long term
a more rewarding approach for the Exchange’s owners, The Hong Kong Stock Exchange
(HKEx).
Mark Sellier noted that while data
quoted by Mr Chamberlain as underscoring the continued
or even improved transparency and efficiency of pricing during the Pandemic enforced
closure of the Ring had indicated, his concern was that prices determined by activity
created by financial and algorithmic participants could at times distort the underlying
trade conditions that pertained for accurate global metals prices. This point was
taken up by Murat Bayram, who expressed great concern
that distortions could have enormous consequences for the trade and industry sector
and quoted the recent detailed submission of concerns of the proposed changes that
the German metals trade, through its trade body VDM (Verband
Deutscher Metallhändler), of
which he is a director, had submitted to the LME. Michael Lion added that the integrity and responsibility
that VDM had attributed to the LME was a significant consideration for reciprocity
of support by the LME, as Mr Bayram
noted, the LME has always stated that support of the trade was a priority of their
core mission. Mr Chamberlain acknowledged this, but pointed
out that the LME was obligated to ensuring demonstrably that a democratic and broad
optimal transparency of the pricing activity of its reference pricing was obtained
and data suggested that the electronic market might best achieve this. He further
noted nobody wanted to be the one for finally closing the Ring after 144 years,
but that all aspects needed to be realistically considered.
Mr Lion sought Mr Chamberlain’s thoughts
on the issue of regulatory “equivalence” issue with the EU currently a matter of
concern in the financial community of The City of London, and he reassuringly explained
that the LME had preemptively taken necessary actions to satisfy its requirements
in that regard – as Mr Lion noted, given the VDM’s support
by the German trade of the London based LME as their institution of choice the role
of the trade in the LME’s future was reassuring.
Turning to the LME’s mission to advance sustainability, Mr Lion hoped that the recycling sector as the epitome of sustainability
could, through the closer interaction between BIR and the LME, assist in supporting
their objectives and Mr Chamberlain noted that through
its ferrous scrap contract and forthcoming UBC aluminium can scrap contract he saw
a significant role for recycling from the Exchange’s perspective.
The three resident contributors expressed BIR’s great appreciation
for Mr Chamberlain’s highly informative and understanding
contributions to the conversation and providing “The Challenge” with the privilege
of his engaging with BIR and the recycling sector and hoped that the views expressed
would constructively enhance the LME’s current deliberations with which endeavors
they wished him and the future of the LME every success.
ends
BIR is the international trade association of the recycling
industries. Around 70 countries are
represented through their national trade associations and individual companies,
which are involved in recycling. BIR comprises four commodity divisions: iron & steel, non-ferrous metals, paper
and textiles, and has four commodity committees
dealing with stainless steel & special alloys, plastics, tyres & rubber and E-scrap. BIR’s primary goal is to promote
recycling and recyclability, thereby conserving natural resources, protecting the
environment and facilitating free trade of secondary raw materials.