COUNCIL
FOR TRADE IN GOODS
Members Press EU
and UK to Address Concerns of Reduced Market Access following Brexit
·
EU's
trade remedies and non-tariff barriers
·
China's
restrictions on imported scrap materials
·
Indonesia's
trade policies and practices
·
India's
quantitative restrictions on imported pulses
·
Progress
on beverage taxes and car import measures
·
United
States measures on ICT products
WTO
members at the Goods Council meeting held on 14-15 November pressed the
European Union and the United Kingdom to address concerns of reduced access to
the two markets after the UK withdraws from the EU. Members also heard concerns
raised over the EU’s trade remedies and non-tariff barriers on agricultural
products.
Fifteen
WTO members drew attention to Brexit-related trade
concerns, citing commercial disruptions caused by repeated extensions of the
UK's withdrawal date and apprehensions that third countries would be crowded
out of EU and UK tariff rate quotas (TRQs) if no trade agreement is brokered
between the two sides.
TRQs
are prized by traders due to the lower tariffs these confer to goods that fall
within the quota. Many WTO members worry, however, that EU and UK proposals to
split up the current EU TRQs would reduce the flexibility to move products
between the UK and the rest of the EU-27. Members further noted the elimination
proposed for 60 of the current 142 TRQs, which cover around 400 tariff lines.
This amounts to EUR 28 billion worth of EU imports in 2018, members said. WTO
members would suffer a loss of market access for 55 products in the UK market
and five products in the EU market, they said.
The
EU said that an orderly withdrawal of the UK is the preferred option and that
detailed information has been published to reduce commercial
uncertainties. The EU reassured WTO members that it is willing to
continue negotiations in an open and fair manner regardless of the scenarios
for the UK's withdrawal.
EU's trade remedies and non-tariff
barriers
EU
regulations for trade remedies, particularly Regulation 2017/2321 and
Regulation 2018/825, were raised for discussion at the Goods Council for the
first time. The Russian Federation indicated that the EU's determination of
whether an import had significant price distortions and its calculation of
anti-dumping duties were inconsistent with WTO rules.
The
EU said the regulations complied with WTO rules. Its alternative anti-dumping
calculation method is country-neutral and its measures are aimed at enhancing
trade defence instruments by enabling more
transparency, accelerated decision making and supporting small and medium-sized
enterprises, the EU said.
Twenty-seven
WTO members furthermore reiterated concerns over the EU's regulation of
pesticides in crops. Members again said the EU measures were prohibiting the
use of more substances particularly deployed in tropical climates and that
these prohibitions were not based on international standards. The EU said its
measures complied with WTO rules and are necessary to protect consumer health.
It nevertheless assured members it was committed to continuing discussions.
China's restrictions on imported scrap
materials
While
recognizing the responsibility of governments to protect the environment and
public health, the United States expressed concerns that China's July revision
of its draft law on environmental pollution continues to define "solid
waste" to include all scrap materials and bans these imports. Canada, New
Zealand and the EU shared similar concerns that the restrictions are disrupting
recycling programmes worldwide.
China,
as in previous meetings, said residue from recycling and disposal process of
solid waste will pollute the environment and harm human, animal and plant
health.
Indonesia's trade policies and practices
Members
expressed concern over recent developments in Indonesia's nickel export ban and
local content requirements for telecommunication devices and reiterated
previous concerns on Indonesia's halal certifications and quantitative
restrictions on horticultural products. The Council heard that Indonesia brought
forward its nickel export ban to 1 January 2020, two years ahead of the initial
plan. Indonesia was also reported to have issued new measures that may
reinforce and broaden existing local content requirements for
telecommunications devices.
Indonesia
said it did not consider that its trade policies and practices have restricted
trade as statistics indicate trade deficits since 2012 due to increasing
imports. Indonesia added that flows of substandard imports and the loss of
Indonesian jobs have been increasing. However, it assured members that it will
continue efforts to simplify trade procedures and review regulations
periodically.
India's quantitative restrictions on
imported pulses
Australia
and Canada questioned the short window of time India provided in October for
pigeon pea imports to reach its ports. Members
said this threatens to destabilize the global pulses industry. The United
States, EU, Ukraine and New Zealand also reiterated previously aired complaints
on India's other import restrictions on pulses. Russia further sought
clarification on India's Social Welfare Surcharge of 10% of aggregate duties on
most imported products, which is meant to raise funds for education projects.
India
responded that its quantitative restrictions on pulses were aimed at
alleviating the distress farmers faced from the influx of cheap imports.
Regarding the surcharge, India said it will relay the concern to its capital.
Progress on beverage taxes and car
import measures
Switzerland
and the EU welcomed Saudi Arabia's and the United Arab Emirates' decisions to
expand their tax base by 1 December to include other sweetened beverages, thus
no longer discriminating against soft drinks containing sugar. However, both
members expressed concern that Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have
not decreased the tax for energy drinks. For Switzerland, some beverages were
subject to 100% tax while others were not, thus indicating a clear breach of
WTO principles against discrimination. Switzerland further noted that the
situation remains uncertain in Oman. The United States and Japan registered
similar concerns.
Bahrain,
speaking also on behalf of Saudi Arabia, Oman and the United Arab Emirates,
said that the GCC was assessing the replacement of the ad-valorem tax on sweetened
beverages with a specific tax as part of the second phase of its regulatory
reform.
The
United States lauded Viet Nam's plans to ease certain restriction on imported
cars and parts by eliminating lot-by-lot testing requirements and allowing
self-certifications of conformity with safety and emissions regulations. The
United States, along with Russia, the EU and Thailand, asked Viet Nam to
continue providing information and working with WTO members to ease the trade
measures. Viet Nam affirmed that the government has indeed decided to revise
the relevant measures in order to facilitate trade.
United States measures on ICT products
As
in previous meetings, China expressed concerns over US measures that restrict
trade in information and communications technology (ICT) with buyers and
suppliers that pose a potential security threat. The US replied in both cases
that the Goods Council was not the appropriate forum to discuss issues relating
to national security.
China
also raised a previous concern over Australia's market access prohibitions for
5G equipment. Australia reiterated that its measures are consistent with WTO
rules.
Other issues
A
proposal by Argentina, Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, the EU, Japan, New
Zealand, Chinese Taipei and the United States to improve members' compliance
with transparency obligations was brought to the attention of the Council
again.
The
United States, on behalf of the proposal's sponsors, updated the Council on
consultations with other members aimed at balancing incentives to comply with
transparency obligations with administrative measures for those that fail to
meet the requirements.
Members
that took the floor emphasized again the importance of transparency for the
proper functioning of the WTO. Some members reiterated their view that the
proposal provided a good basis for discussion while others restated their
concerns over the punitive approach of the proposal and the resource
constraints that make compliance difficult for members.
Members
also continued discussions on how to improve the functioning of the Goods
Council and its subsidiary bodies based on a suggestion made by Hong Kong,
China, to use annotated agendas and tentative calendars of meetings. Informal
consultations will follow on this issue.
Members
took up other issues and trade concerns on the 38-item meeting agenda,
including those raised in previous meetings. The full agenda of the meeting is
available here.