Mysterious
Killing of Chinese Gold Miners in Central Africa Republic Puts New Pressure on
Beijing
The massacre
of nine workers in the Central African Republic and other recent attacks raise
questions about China’s ability to protect its citizens overseas.
The Chinese embassy in the Central
African Republic had a stark warning for its compatriots in the landlocked nation:
Do not leave the capital city of Bangui. Kidnappings of foreigners were on the rise,
and any Chinese person outside of Bangui was to leave those areas immediately.
Less than a week later, on March
19, a group of gunmen stormed a remote gold mine far away from Bangui and killed
nine Chinese workers.
The Central African government
has said that it investigated the massacre and concluded that a leading rebel group
had orchestrated it. The rebels have denied the allegation and blamed a third party
that operates in the country — Russia’s Wagner mercenary group, which has in turn
accused the rebels. None of the sides has presented evidence for its claims.
The investigation has left a
trail of unanswered questions about the motives and methods of the attackers. More
than a dozen Central African soldiers were supposed to be protecting the site, according
to a diplomat briefed on the investigation, but on the day of the attack, only four
of them were there and all survived.
The victims have not been identified,
and their bodies were cremated shortly after the attack. One local mayor said the
workers were shot at close range. A photo shared by local and Western officials
based in the country showed how the assailants left the bodies face down in a row
in the rust-colored mud, as if to send a message.
The murkiness around the killings
underscored the growing security challenge facing the Chinese government as Chinese
companies have rapidly expanded their activities around the world, often stepping
into the middle of conflict zones with unstable governments and armed groups vying
for territory.
Chinese workers have faced rising
threats in countries like Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan,
including a suicide bombing last year that targeted a Chinese cultural center in Karachi and killed three Chinese teachers. In 2020,
three Chinese nationals were killed after a Chinese-owned warehouse in Zambia was
set on fire.
The attacks have exposed the
widening disconnect between China’s economic ambitions and its security apparatus
abroad, which relies on a patchwork of local military, mercenaries and private firms
to guard Chinese workers, analysts say. China’s military has a minimal presence
overseas and a limited ability to project force far beyond its borders, according
to John Van Oudenaren, an analyst focused on Chinese foreign
policy at the Jamestown Foundation, a think tank.
But China’s leader, Xi Jinping,
has aggressively trumpeted a more nationalist image of China, raising the pressure
at home on his government to show that China is proactively protecting its citizens
overseas. In late April, as part of the evacuation of Chinese nationals out of Sudan,
which has been rocked by a war between two rival generals, the Chinese government
sent a military vessel that displayed the sign: “Chairman Xi has sent this naval
ship to bring everyone home.”
“China is on thin ice in the
sense that they’re entering some of the most poorly governed places in the world
and supercharging conflicts,” said Ammar Malik, a senior research scientist at William
& Mary who tracks Chinese development finance. “And every time an attack happens,
it angers the Chinese public and forces China to reconsider this light-touch, hands-off
approach.”
After the killings in the Central
African Republic, people on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, commented sarcastically
that the attack did not align with the portrayal of China in the “Wolf Warrior”
movies, a pair of nationalistic Chinese action films that promoted the notion that
China would always protect its citizens from danger in foreign lands.
But most online comments about
the attack were heavily censored, with Weibo playing down hashtags about the deaths.
Instead, the site highlighted a sharp public rebuke by Mr. Xi, who called for the
attackers to be severely punished.
The accusations around Wagner’s
potential involvement are particularly sensitive for China, pointing to the complications
Mr. Xi faces as he strengthens ties with Russia, even amid the war in Ukraine, with
the goal of counterbalancing the United States and its Western allies. The killings
occurred one day before Mr. Xi landed in Moscow to meet with his Russian counterpart,
Vladimir V. Putin.
Some influential Chinese, like
Hu Xijin, the former editor of the Global Times, a Communist
Party newspaper, have said those who blamed Wagner for the attack were trying to
undermine relations between China and Russia.
Wagner, a Kremlin-backed private
network of firms involved in security, political influence and the exploitation
of natural resources, has been a dominant presence in the Central African Republic
since 2018. It provides personal protection and political support for President
Faustin-Archange Touadéra, in
exchange for access to diamonds, gold and timber.
In many parts of the country,
Wagner has pushed out rebel groups from resource-rich areas, prompting them to turn
more to kidnappings for ransom.
In early March, miners started
to work near the village of Chimbolo, several hours northeast
of the capital. The Gold Coast Group, a Chinese company, was opening a new gold
mine there. The attack came soon after.
Researchers and local officials
say the area is controlled by Wagner and the Central African army. But the government
blamed the Coalition of Patriots for Change, an alliance of rebel groups. In response,
Aboubakar Siddick Ali, a spokesman
for the group, said in an interview that the rebels did not operate in the area
to avoid being “cornered by Wagner.”
Wagner has become more dependent
on its mining operations in Africa, a source of hard cash that helps businessmen
close to the Kremlin circumvent the Western sanctions imposed after its full-scale
invasion of Ukraine, said Alessandro Arduino, an expert on Chinese security at King’s
College London.
“Wagner and China have the same
exploitative interest in Africa, but Wagner thrives in chaos, while China needs
stability,” Mr. Arduino said.
Gold Coast, which was not reachable
for comment, was one of many small Chinese mining companies that have sought in
recent years to mine gold from the Central African Republic. Those firms have diverted
waterways to mine riverbeds, researchers say, damaging the environment and angering
local populations. Several of them have also been accused of human rights abuses.
“The presence of foreign companies
creates tensions with locals, as one can expect,” said Olivier Mbombo Mossito, who previously worked as a public prosecutor in Bambari, the closest city to the site of the killing. “The acquisition
of this mining site by a Chinese company may have caused some anger, but from whom?”
Arnaud Djoubaye
Abazène, the Central African Republic’s justice minister,
told reporters last month that the rebels were “unquestionably” behind the killing.
But he did not release any evidence or take questions from reporters. He thanked
“our Russian allies” for arresting and killing some of the suspected attackers,
who have not been named.
Yevgeny Prigozhin,
the head of Wagner, said in a written response to questions that “bandits killed
the Chinese.”
“The bandits were found,” Mr.
Prigozhin wrote. “There is nothing to discuss here.”
But researchers and Western diplomats
say the killings of the miners did not fit the profile of how rebel groups have
targeted Chinese nationals in the past. The groups have typically kidnapped Chinese
workers to extract ransom from their employers, with such execution-style assassinations
being highly unusual.
Two Chinese officials dispatched
from Beijing attended the justice minister’s news conference. They said that they
had not yet been able to access the scene of the crime.
The mine has been closed since
March 19. China repatriated about 80 citizens shortly after the killing.