Nepal Prime Minister Proposes Options to
Settle Boundary Dispute with India
·
If India wants to retain the disputed Kalapani
region because of strategic reasons, India can offer us other lands
Kathmandu: Nepal's Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal aka 'Prachanda' said that during his just concluded
visit to India, he discussed with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, several
alternatives for settling the boundary dispute between the two neighbours.
There are boundary disputes between Nepal and India
particularly over Kalapani, Lipulekh,
and Limpiyadhura.
Earlier, bilateral relations had cooled after both sides
issued boundary maps in 2020 by incorporating the disputed region of Kalapani, Limpiyadhura and Lipu Lekh, which lie beyond
north-western border of Nepal's previous map.
"Talks were held with Prime Minister Modi about
settling boundary disputes," said Prime Minister Dahal
upon his arrival at Tribhuvan International Airport, Kathmandu. "Talks
also concentrated on why not to explore different alternatives to settling the
dispute."
He said that the land swap between two countries could be
one alternative similar to settlement of border disputes between India and
Bangladesh.
In 2015, India and Bangladesh had resolved a decades-old
border issue through a land swap agreement.
"If India wants to retain the disputed Kalapani region because of strategic reasons, India can
offer us other lands," he said.
During the joint press meet after the bilateral meeting in
New Delhi on June 1, Prime Minister Modi said, "We will continue to work
to take our relations to the height of the Himalayas. And in this spirit, we
will resolve all the issues, be it the boundary issue or any other issue,"
he said.
While two leaders expressed belief that the boundary issue
could be resolved with continuation of improvement in relations, Prime Minister
Dahal after arriving in Kathmandu, said that his
visit was important to build political trust between the two sides.
Stating that much efforts were made to reach an
understanding with the India agreement signed, he said mutual trust enhanced
during the visit would help not only to implement the agreements signed but
also reach conclusion on pending issues as well.
He basically highlighted the success in initialling the
long-term power trade agreement with India which would ensure long-term market
access to Nepal's power in India.
"Power trade agreement has essentially been
concluded," he said. "Only a formality is remaining which will also
happen soon."
Prime Minister Modi had announced that a long-term power
trade deal with Nepal was signed while also announcing India aimed to buy
10,000 MW of electricity from Nepal in 10 years.
Nepal' existing installed capacity is just around 2700MW,
according to Nepal Electricity Authority, state owned power utility body of
Nepal. The Indian authorities have so far allowed it to sell 452.6MW of power
in the Indian market.
At the airport, Prime Minister Dahal
also said that there has been agreement in principle about India granting
approval to export Nepal's power to Bangladesh through Indian territory.
He also described agreement reached on amending the Treaty
of Transit between the two countries as an important achievement of his visit.
With this amendment to the treaty, Nepal will be allowed to use India's inland
waterways.
Two countries also signed a number of agreements on
hydropower development with joint investment between two countries,
construction of cross border transmission lines and other connectivity projects
related to digital, railway, highway and waterways.
Nepali foreign policy experts also hailed the visit as a
success saying that there have been important agreements in the area of
economic cooperation.
Former Nepali Ambassador to India Lok Raj Baral told Indian Narrative that agreement reached in the
area of enhancing economic cooperation was important as focus on disputed
issues could derail these achievements.
Nishchal N. Pandey, director at Centre for
South Asian Studies, a think tank said that the power trading agreement was
definitely good for Nepali economy. "We also need to build our own
internal consumption capacity," he added.