Online Services Trade Challenges and Opportunities Amid COVID-19 Crisis Discussed at WTO
·
New trade concerns
Ø Australia's
5G-related measures
Ø Russia's fixed
satellite operators measure
Ø Russia's software
pre-installation measure
·
Other trade concerns
Ø China's cybersecurity
measures
Ø Viet Nam's
cybersecurity measures
At a meeting of the Council for Trade in Services on 1
July, WTO members discussed their efforts to increase the digital capabilities
of businesses and consumers in view of the growing importance of online
services, especially during the COVID-19 crisis. They also raised specific
trade concerns related to transparency, 5G communications networks,
pre-installed software, satellite operators and cybersecurity.
The international trading system has become increasingly
services-oriented, with online services becoming particularly important during
the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to this trend, a dozen WTO members proposed
a discussion, in the context of the Work Programme on
Electronic Commerce, on how governments are helping businesses and consumers
increase digital capabilities while seeking to address the digital divide. All
members welcomed the proposal as a positive contribution to the e-commerce work
programme.
The proponents suggested a discussion of the challenges
and opportunities for digital services delivery and governments' activities
aimed at achieving better digital inclusion. This includes providing assistance
to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and developing countries
so that they may increase their share of services exports.
Many developed countries presented their ongoing programmes for increasing digital capabilities in
developing countries. Some developing countries underlined that improving
connectivity, mastering digital tools, and enhancing international cooperation
are essential to make the transition from being buyers to suppliers in
international services trade.
Several developing countries highlighted the key role of
e-commerce in supporting economic growth and development and in helping MSMEs,
in particular, remain active during the crisis. They also mentioned several
challenges, including infrastructural constraints and the need to have access
to data. They pointed to the importance of government policies that help ensure
the gains from online services trade are distributed more equitably across
countries.
Members also discussed the COVID-19 pandemic and its
implications for trade in services. Many delegations highlighted the importance
of sharing experiences, including on trade-facilitating measures adopted to
deal with the crisis and to promote economic recovery.
Several WTO members referred to a recent report
issued by the WTO Secretariat, which highlighted a greater reliance on online
services in sectors such as retail, health, education, telecommunications and
audio-visual in the wake of the crisis. This is due to consumers developing new
ways of coping with social distancing measures and to suppliers accelerating
efforts to expand their online operations.
Many members noted that the crisis has underscored the
urgent need to address disparities in digital connectivity. In reference to the
moratorium on imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions, which
members renewed in December 2019, the African Group said that the pandemic
had further highlighted the importance of collecting tariff revenue on such
transmissions.
Many members said that creating conditions conducive to
trade in services, including open trade policies, will be key to bringing about
a sustained and socially inclusive recovery from the COVID-19 crisis. They also
stressed the need to avoid restrictions in areas such as cross-border data
flows that could undermine economic recovery and the importance of
services-related measures being put in place in a transparent manner.
New trade concerns
Australia's
5G-related measures
China raised concerns over Australia's measures on 5G
telecom projects, arguing that these prohibit Chinese companies from
participating due to unreasonable, non-transparent and discriminatory
requirements. These measures violate the non-discrimination principle (also
known as the "most-favoured nation principle")
and the transparency obligations in the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)
and Australia's GATS commitments, China said. It argued that they also
undermined the business operations of Chinese services suppliers in Australia.
China called on Australia to treat Chinese companies in an objective, just and
fair manner.
Australia said that its 5G
network requirements are fully consistent with WTO rules and that foreign
companies are welcome in the country. Australia said it is the first time that
it has heard concerns about this matter in the Council and reiterated its
availability to engage with members in a constructive manner.
Russia's fixed
satellite operators measure
The United States sought clarifications about a Russian
measure concerning the allocation of radio frequency bands for foreign
satellite operators, arguing that it violates Russia's relevant commitments
under the GATS. Canada and the European Union echoed the US concerns.
Russia stated that it was not aware of the measure at
issue having created any difficulties for foreign suppliers and emphasised that there have been no instances of Russian
operators being prevented from using the services of foreign satellite
operators.
Russia's software
pre-installation measure
The United States raised a concern about a Russian
measure on the pre-installation of software, noting that, although the measure
had been previously discussed in the Council for Trade in Goods and the
Technical Barriers to Trade Committee, it also had implications for services
trade. The US claims that the measure violates Russia's GATS commitments in
several services sectors, including computer and related services,
telecommunications and audio-visual services. Canada, the European Union and
Japan echoed the US concern.
Russia noted that the legislative process has taken into
account the views of foreign service suppliers and
stated that the measure at issue did not prohibit the pre-installation of
foreign software, did not contain any discriminatory provisions and was
consistent with Russia's GATS commitments.
Other trade concerns
China's cybersecurity
measures
Japan and the United States reiterated concerns over
China's proposed implementation of its Cybersecurity Law, including on matters
related to data localization and security assessments on cross-border transfer
of data. Japan said it is closely following how China is taking its comments
into consideration, including the need for a level playing field in China for
foreign and domestic operators. The United States shared Japan's concerns and
asked China to update the Council on the status of the draft decree. These
concerns were echoed by Canada, the European Union and Chinese Taipei.
China said that the purpose of its cybersecurity measures
was to guarantee the security of critical information infrastructure and its
supply chain and to safeguard its national security. China said it followed a
transparent legislative approach by seeking comments from various stakeholders and
taking them into consideration and would continue to do so in the future. It
reiterated its willingness to engage on this matter and recalled that Japan and
the United States also have laws on cybersecurity. It recalled its concerns
regarding the relevant US Executive Order issued in May 2019 and called on the
US to bring its measure in line with its commitments and obligations under the
GATS.
Viet Nam's
cybersecurity measures
Japan and the United States reiterated concerns about
Viet Nam's draft cybersecurity measures, including on issues such as data
localization, which they claim are negatively disrupting business for foreign
operators. Canada, the European Union and Chinese Taipei echoed these concerns.
Viet Nam reiterated that it has followed a transparent
process and kept an open mind by consulting with all relevant stakeholders.