PMO Writes to
Ministries to Quantify Agro Subsidies
India Prepares Food Subsidy Data for WTO
New Delhi plans to quantify
all subsidies and farm support falling under the WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture
by 15 January 2015, according to a letter dated 17 November 2014 from the prime
minister’s office cited by the Indian Express.
(It may be recalled that the
Bali deal at WTO when India raised the question of food subsidies had a
negative impact. The final wordings allowed India to continue with subsidies
till a settlement is reached. In return, India is enjoined to report regularly
on the quantum of subsidy thus opening the agri
sector to scrutiny and comment from the 150 plus WTO members! Thus India is
saddled with reporting aid).
The letters follows an
agreement last Thursday at the WTO, which clarified that a prior commitment not
to challenge developing country public food stockholding schemes under the
trade body’s farm subsidy rules would not expire in 2017 but will continue till
a settlement is reached.
The deal also reaffirmed that
countries benefitting from this “peace clause” would share data and information
on their agricultural subsidies. Meanwhile, WTO members will ramp up efforts to
negotiate a “permanent solution” to developing countries’
concerns in this area, with a new target date of end-2015 for such an
outcome.
As part of a move spearheaded
by India, developing countries in the G-33 coalition have complained that price
inflation over the last two decades has eroded their ability under WTO rules to
buy food at government-set prices as part of public stockholding schemes.
Quantification a first step
Quantifying farm support is “a
first step in understanding the extent of support that this sector needs,”
Principal Secretary Nripendra Misra
in the Prime Minister’s office reportedly told other senior policymakers in the
letter, according to the Indian Express.
The newspaper cites a letter
from the Principal Secretary in the prime minister’s office, Nripendra Misra, addressed to the
Secretaries of the departments of Commerce, Agriculture, Food and Public
Distribution, Fertilizers, and Expenditure.
“It would be useful if this
exercise is completed in two months’ time, i.e. by 15.1.2015,3 Misra reportedly
writes.
The letter adds that the
review should “study the existing support measures for agriculture, examine the
possibilities that are there under the Agreement on Agriculture for promoting
agriculture, classify all the ongoing support
activities in the context of the various permissible and regulated activities
under the WTO, and suggest possible changes and improvements that may be needed
in future.”
(According to Indian Express,
India has admitted to $56.13bn agro subsidy in 2010-11 in a Sept 10, 2014
filing at to WTO).
The September report indicated
that trade-distorting support fell consistently below WTO ceilings for the
seven-year period up to 2010-11. However, the government has warned that plans
to expand subsidies to poor consumers under its new Food Security Act could
mean that ceilings on farm support for rice might be breached if the food
continues to be procured at administered prices.
The official figures presented
in September revealed that just below US$14 billion of government spending was
allocated for public stockholding for food security purposes – more than
doubling support levels seven years previously.