Bare Printed Circuit Boards
(PCB) from China and Hong Kong - DGTR Initiates Anti-dumping Investigation on Complaint of Indian Printed Circuit Association (IPCA) on behalf of Domestic
Industry
·
Excluded
Products-
Ø PCBs with more than 6 layers;
Ø PCBs for use in mobile
phone applications;
Ø Populated printed circuit
boards of all sizes.
·
Size per sq.m to be
compared with same size
·
Only Six producers furnish data in fragmented
industry
·
First Major Investigation for Electronics Industry
[Initiation Notification Case No. AD
(01) -16/2022 dated 30 December 2022]
Subject:
Initiation of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of "Printed Circuit
Boards (PCB)" originating in or exported from China PR and Hong Kong.
1. F.
No. 6/16/2022-DGTR The Indian Printed Circuit Association (IPCA) (hereinafter
also referred to as the "applicant association" or the "applicant"
or the "petitioner") has filed an application before the Designated Authority
(hereinafter also referred to as the "Authority") on behalf of the domestic
industry, in accordance with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as amended from time
to time (hereinafter also referred to as the "Act") and the Customs Tariff
(Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping duty on Dumped Articles
for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from time to time (hereinafter
also referred to as the "Rules" or the "AD Rules") for initiation
of an anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of "Printed Circuits
Boards (PCB)" (hereinafter referred to as the "subject goods"
or the "product under consideration"), originating in or exported from
China PR and Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as the "subject countries").
2. The
applicant association has alleged that material injury and threat to material injury
is being caused to the domestic industry due to dumped imports of the subject goods
originating in or exported from the subject countries and has requested for the
imposition of anti-dumping duty on the import of the subject goods originating in
or exported from the subject countries.
A.
PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION
3. The
product under consideration (PUC) in the application is Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs).
A Printed Circuit Board is a bare board which is supplied with layout data or artwork
and used to mount components. A PCB is manufactured and sold as single side, double-side
or multiple layers. The scope of the product under consideration in the present
investigation is limited up to six-layer PCB. The following PCBs are excluded from
the scope of the product under consideration: -
a.
PCBs with more than 6 layers;
b.
PCBs for use in mobile phone applications;
c.
Populated printed circuit boards of all sizes.
4. The
product under consideration is classified under Chapter 85 and under the tariff
heading 8534 0000 "Printed Circuits" of the Schedule I to the Customs
Tariff Act. However, the applicant has claimed that there is a possibility of import
of product under consideration under any other heading I tari ff item. The HS classification
for the product under consideration is only indicative and in no way binding upon
the product scope.
5. The
PCBs are mainly used to provide electrical connection and mechanical support to
the electrical components of a circuit. A PCB is assembled with electronic components
like transistors, resistors, capacitors etc. In the assembly process which happens
at the customer's end, a PCB is populated (or "stuffed") with electronic
components to form a functional printed circuit assembly (PCA) which is also called
a "printed circuit board assembly"(PCBA). Populated/stuffed printed circuit
boards are used in all kinds of electronic circuits, from simple transistor amplifiers
to the biggest super computers. PCBA are used in cars, telephones, ovens, toys,
televisions, computers, lighting solutions etc.
Product
Control Number CPCN)
6. The
applicant association in the application has proposed Product Control Numbers (PCNs)
as below for making a fair comparison of the imported product with the like article
produced by the domestic industry-
|
S.No |
Criteria
-1- Layer |
PCN
for Parameter-1 (2 digits) |
Criteria-2-
Material Type |
PCN
for Paramete r-2 (2 digits) |
Final
PCN |
Explanation |
|
1 |
Single |
SS |
Paper
phenolic |
pp |
SSPP |
Single
Side PCB made from Paper Phenolics |
|
2 |
SS |
Glass
epoxy |
GE |
SSGE |
|
|
|
3 |
SS |
Composite
Epoxy |
CE |
SSCE |
|
|
|
4 |
SS |
MCPCB
(ALUMINIU M BACKING) |
MC |
SSMC |
|
|
|
5 |
SS |
Flexible |
FL |
SSFL |
|
|
|
6 |
Double |
DS |
Glass
epoxy |
GE |
DSGE |
|
|
7 |
DS |
Composite
Epoxy |
CE |
DSCE |
|
|
|
8 |
DS |
Ceramic
based |
CR |
DSCR |
|
|
|
9 |
DS |
MCPCB
(ALUMINIU M BACKING) |
MC |
DSMC |
|
|
|
10 |
DS |
Polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) |
PT |
DSPT |
|
|
|
11 |
DS |
Radio
Frequency |
RF |
DSRF |
|
|
|
12 |
4
layers |
4L |
Glass
epoxy |
GE |
4LGE |
|
|
13 |
6layers |
6L |
Glass
epoxy |
GE |
6LGE |
|
7. The
parties to the investigation can provide their comments on the proposed PUC/PCNs
for the purpose of this investigation, if any , within
thirty (30) days from the date of initiation of this investigation.
LIKE
ARTICLE
8. The
applicant association has claimed that there is no known difference in the subject
goods produced by the domestic industry and the subject goods imported from the
subject countries. Both the goods are comparable in terms of physical & chemical
characteristics, functions & uses, pricing, distribution & marketing, and
tariff classification of the goods. The Authority notes that the two products are
technically and commercially substitutable. The consumers have used and are using
the two products interchangeably. Therefore, for the purpose of the present investigation,
the subject goods produced by the domestic industry are being treated as 'like article'
to the subject goods imported from the subject countries.
B. SUBJECT
COUNTRIES
9. The
application has been filed in respect of the dumped imports of the product under
consideration from China PR and Hong Kong.
C. PERIOD
OF INVESTIGATION (POI)
10. The
period of investigation for the present investigation is from 1st July 2021
to 30th June 2022 (12 months). The injury investigation period will be 1st April 2018
to 3 P' March 2019, 1st April
2019 to 3Pt March 20, 1st April
2020 to 30th June 2021 (15 months) and the POI.
D.
DOMESTIC INDUSTRY AND STANDING
11. The
application has been fi led by the Indian Printed Circuit Association (IPCA) on
behalf of its member companies producing PCB. It has been claimed that there are
close to 200 manufacturers of PCBs in India, most of whom are small and in the unorganized
sector. The Indian manufacturers of PCBs are also in MSME sector and fragmented
across India. The applicant association had filed the application with three member
companies as applicants providing the complete information in the formats prescribed
by the Authority with the support from nine other member companies manufacturing
PCBs in India.
12. Subsequently,
the applicant association requested the Authority that the present application may
be treated as filed in terms of Trade Notice No. 09/2021 dated 29th July 2021 as
amended by Trade Notice No. 1112021 dated 181h November 2021, which states that
in case the domestic industry is fragmented, the application may be filed by an
association on behalf of the domestic producers provided such domestic producers
must constitute a major proportion of the total eligible domestic production of
like article as per Rule 2(b) and Rule 5 (3) (a) of the AD Rules. Accordingly, its
six member companies filed the relevant information as prescribed in Annexure-I
and the applicant association has also met the pre-requisites prescribed under Annexure
II of Trade Notice 09/2021 as amended by Trade Notice No. 1112021 dated 18th November
2021. The applicant association has claimed that its member companies producing
PCB constitute 80-90% of the total production of the like article in India as per
Rule 5(3)(a) of the AD Rules. The six applicant producers who have provided the
relevant data for the current application constitute more than 25% of the total
Indian production. The domestic producers who have provided the data as per Annexure-,!have certified that they have not imported the product under
consideration from the subject countries. Further, they are neither related to any
producer/ exporter of the product under consideration in the subject countries nor
to the importers of the subject goods in India.
13. The
total production of the companies who have provided the relevant data and the companies
who have expressly supported the application constitutes 39.82% of the total domestic
production of the PUC in India. Hence, the present application fulfils the requirement
of Rule 2(b) read with Rule 5 of the AD Rules.
14. On
the basis of the information available, the Authority is satisfied that the application
has been made 'by or on behalf of the domestic industry in terms of the provisions
contained in Rule 2 (b) and Rule 5 (3) of the Rules and the Trade Notice 09/2021
dated 29th July 2021 as amended by Trade Notice No. 11/2021 dated 181h November
2021.
E.
BASIS OF ALLEGED DUMPING
Normal
value for China PR
15. The
applicant association has claimed that in terms of Article 15(a)(i) of China's Accession Protocol and Para 7 of the Annexure-!
to the AD Rules, the normal value of producers of China PR may be determined based
on the cost or domestic selling price prevailing in China PR only if the responding
producers from China PR demonstrate that their cost and price information are based
on market driven principles and allow for fair comparison in terms of paras 1 to
6 of Annexure-I to the AD Rules, failing which, normal value for the producers from
the subject country be determined based on paras 7 and 8 of Annexure-!to the AD
Rules.
16. The
applicant association has also claimed that the data relating to cost or price in
a market economy third country or recourse to other alternative methods is not available
at this stage. The normal value has been, therefore, constructed based on the best
estimates of the cost of the production in India of the subject goods as per the
best information available after duly adjusting the selling, general and administrative
expenses with reasonable profit margin.
Normal
value for Hong Kong
17. The
applicant association has claimed that the domestic cost and selling prices of PUC
in Hong Kong is not available. The normal value has been, therefore, constructed
based on the best estimates of the cost of the production in India of the subject
goods as per the best information available after duly adjusting the selling, general
and administrative expenses with reasonable profit margin
Export
Price
18. The
applicant association has taken the CIF price of imports into India reported as
per secondary source data and claimed adjustments on account of ocean freight, marine
insurance, commission, bank charges, port expenses, inland freight, loading and
unloading charges, to determine the ex-factory export price.
Dumping
Margin
19. The
applicant has claimed that the PUC is a customised product
and is produced and sold on the basis of specifications provided by the customers.
The PUC is manufactured and sold in varying sizes based on customer requirements
which may range from a few square millimetres to hundreds
of square millimetres. For a particular type of PCB, the
per square meter cost will be same but the per no. cost will widely vary depending
upon its size. Thus, it is claimed that the comparison of cost and price of PUC
should be done on square meter basis. The domestic industry has provided the cost
and price information on square meter basis.
20. Thus,
the normal value and the export price have been compared on square meter basis at
the ex-factory level wherever identifiable in the import data, which prima facie
shows that the dumping margin is above the de-minimis level and is significant in
respect of the product under consideration from the subject countries. Thus, there
is sufficient prima facie evidence that the product under consideration from the
subject countries is being dumped in the domestic market of India by the exporters
from the subject countries.
F. INJURY
AND CAUSAL LINK
21. Information
furnished by the applicant association has been considered for assessment of injury
to the domestic industry. The applicant association has provided prima facie evidence
with respect to the injury suffered by the domestic industry because of the alleged
dumped imports in the form of increased volume of dumped imports in absolute as
well as in relative terms in comparison to the production and consumption in India.
There exists prima facie evidence that the domestic industry has suffered injury
and threat to injury due to the alleged dumped imports from the subject countries.
G. INITIATION
OF ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATION
22. On
the basis of the duly substantiated written application by the IPCA on behalf of
the domestic producers, and having satisfied itself, on the basis of the prima facie
evidence submitted, about dumping of the subject goods originating in or exported
from the subject countries, injury to the domestic industry and causal link between
such alleged dumping and injury, and in accordance with Section 9A of the Act read
with Rule 5 of the AD Rules, the Authority, hereby, initiates an investigation to
determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping in respect of
the subject goods originating in or exported from the subject countries and to recommend
the amount of anti-dumping duty, which if levied, would be adequate to remove the
injury to the domestic industry.
H. PROCEDURE
23. The
principles as stipulated under Rule 6 of the AD Rules shall be followed in the present
investigation.
I. SUBMISSION
OF INFORMATION
24. All
communication should be sent to the Designated Authority via email at the email
addresses adg16-dgtr@gov.in,
adv13- dgtr@gov.in, jd15-dgtr@gov.in and
jd16- dgtr@gov.in.
It should be ensured that the narrative part of
the submission is m searchable PDF/MS Word format and data files are in MS Excel
format.
25. The
known producers/exporters in the subject countries, the Governments of the subject
countries through their embassies in India, the importers and users in India who
are known to be associated with the subject goods are being informed separately
to enable them to file all the relevant information within the time limits mentioned
in para 28 of this notification. All such information must be filed in the form
and manner as prescribed by this initiation notification, the AD Rules and the applicable
trade notices issued by the Authority.
26. Any
other interested party may also make its submissions relevant to the investigation
in the form and manner prescribed by this initiation notification, the AD Rules
and the applicable trade notices issued by the Authority within the time-limit mentioned
in this initiation notification.
27. Any
party making any confidential submission before the Authority is required to make
a non- confidential version of the same available to the other interested parties.
28. Interested
parties are further advised to keep a regular watch on the official website of the
Designated Authority http://www.dgtr.gov.inl
for any updated information with respect to this
investigation.
J. TIME
LIMIT
29. Any
information relating to the present investigation should be sent to the Designated
Authority via email at the email addresses adgl6-dgtr@gov.in, adv
13- dgtr@gov.in,
jd15-dgtr@gov.in andjd16-dgtr@gov.in within
thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the notice as per Rule 6(4) of the
Rules. It may, however, be noted that in terms of explanation of the said Rule,
the notice calling for information and other documents shall be deemed to have been
received within one week from the date on which it was sent by the Designated Authority
or transmitted to the appropriate diplomatic representative of the exporting countries.
If no information is received within the prescribed time limit or the information
received is incomplete, the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the
facts available on record in accordance with the AD Rules.
30. All
the interested parties are hereby advised to intimate their interest (including
the nature of interest) in the instant matter and file their questionnaire responses
within the above time limit.
31. Where
an interested party seeks additional time for filing of submissions, it must demonstrate
sufficient cause for such extension in terms of Rule 6(4) of the AD Rules and such
request must come within the time stipulated in this notification.
K. SUBMISSION
OF INFORMATION ON A CONFIDENTIAL BASIS
32. Where
any party to the present investigation makes confidential submissions or provides
information on a confidential basis before the Authority, it is required to simultaneously
submit a non-confidential version of such information in terms of Rule
7(2)
of the AD Rules and in accordance with the relevant trade notices issued by the
Authority in this regard. Failure to adhere to the above may lead to rejection of
the response I submissions.
33. The
parties making any submission (including Appendices/Annexures attached thereto),
before the Authority including questionnaire response, are required to file confidential
and non-confidential versions separately.
34. The
submissions must be clearly marked as "confidential" or "non-confidential"
at the top of each page. Any submission which has been made to the Authority without
such markings shall be treated as "non-confidential" information by the
Authority, and the Authority shall be at liberty to allow the other interested parties
to inspect such submissions.
35. The
confidential version shall contain all information which is by nature confidential
and/or other information which the supplier of such information claims as confidential.
For information which are claimed to be confidential by nature or the information
on which confidentiality is claimed because of other reasons, the supplier of the
information is required to provide a good cause statement along with the supplied
information as to why such information cannot be disclosed.
36. The
non-confidential version of the information filed by the interested parties is required
to be a replica of the confidential version with the confidential information preferably
indexed or blanked out (in case indexation is not feasible) and summarized depending
upon the information on which confidentiality is claimed.
37. The
non- confidential summary must be in sufficient detail to permit a reasonable understanding
of the substance of the information furnished on a confidential basis. However,
in exceptional circumstances, the party submitting the confidential information
may indicate that such information is not susceptible to summary, and a statement
of reasons containing a sufficient and adequate explanation in terms of Rule
7 of
the AD Rules and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, as to why such
summarization is not possible must be provided to the satisfaction of the Authority.
The other interested parties can offer their comments on the confidentiality claimed
within seven (7) Days of receipt of the non-confidential version of the documents.
38. The
Authority may accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of
the nature of the information submitted. If the Authority is satisfied the request
for confidentiality is not warranted or if the supplier of the information is either
unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized
or summary form, it may disregard such information.
39. Any
submission made without a meaningful non-confidential version thereof or without
a good cause statement in terms of Rule 7 of the AD Rules and appropriate trade
notices on the confidentiality claim shall not be taken on record by the Authority.
40. The
Authority on being satisfied and accepting the need for confidentiality of the information
provided, shall not disclose it to any party without specific authorization of the
party providing such information.
L. SHARING
OF RESPONSES/SUBMISSIONS
AMONGST INTERESTED PARTIES
41. A
list of registered interested parties will be uploaded on the DGTR's website along
with the request therein to all of them to email the non-confidential version of
their submissions to all other interested parties since the public file will not
be accessible physically due to the ongoing global pandemic.
M. NON-COOPERATION
42. In
case any interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide necessary
information within a reasonable period or within the time stipulated by the Authority
in this initiation notification, or significantly impedes the investigation, the
Authority may declare such interested party as non-cooperative and record its findings
on the basis of the facts available to it and make such recommendations to the Central
Government as deemed fit.