Putin
and Biden Shore Up Alliances in Dueling Appearances
On
the surface, it looked like a reversion to the Cold War era. The reality was even
more complicated.
In a day of dueling efforts to shore up allegiances, President Biden wrapped
up a three-day trip to Europe Wednesday (22.02.2023) with a promise of America’s
commitment to its allies as President Vladimir V. Putin warmly welcomed China’s
top diplomat to Moscow and rallied pro-war Russians.
With the anniversary of Moscow’s
invasion of Ukraine approaching, Mr. Biden met in Warsaw with leaders from NATO’s
eastern flank, acknowledging that “you know better than anyone what’s at stake in
this conflict, not just for Ukraine, but for the freedom of democracies throughout
Europe and around the world.”
At around the same time, Mr.
Putin told a boisterous crowd of tens of thousands at a stadium rally that “there
is a battle underway on our historical borders, for our people,” just after he tried
to shore up his most important partnership in a meeting with the top Chinese diplomat,
Wang Yi.
Taken together, the scenes created
the impression that the world is retreating into two blocs that bear similarities
to those of the Cold War.
This time, many former Eastern
Bloc countries — Hungary is a notable exception — are aligning with the West to
oppose Mr. Putin’s aggression. And China and Russia, dropping their many differences,
are conducting military exercises together and deepening their financial ties as
each faces Western sanctions.
But the reality is still more
complicated.
Many other powers — including
India, Turkey and Israel — remain on the fence, continuing to buy oil and gas from
Russia or to work with Mr. Putin diplomatically, while buying arms from the United
States and remaining in its defense orbit. That has touched
off a messy, behind-the-scenes effort by both sides to win support.
For Mr. Biden, the question is
whether the Western allies have the wherewithal to continue arming and supporting
the Ukrainian government at the levels needed to keep an emerging Russian offensive
at bay, and to deter Mr. Putin from once again seeking to take over the entire country.
For Mr. Putin, the doubts may
be even greater, even as he tries to telegraph confidence and public support.
An offensive he began in recent
weeks has yet to make substantial gains. And while he welcomed Mr. Wang at the Kremlin
and spoke of a coming visit from China’s president, Xi Jinping, it is clear that
China is wary about being seen as supporting the war — and at a moment when American
officials are releasing intelligence suggesting that Mr. Putin is again seeking
arms and technology from Beijing.
“China is willing to work with
Russia to maintain a strategic focus, deepen mutual political trust and enhance
strategic coordination,” Mr. Wang told Mr. Putin. He also said the Chinese-Russian
partnership “is not aimed at any third party, and will not accept meddling from
any third party, and even less will it accept duress from any third party.”
That was a clear reference to
the United States, which has threatened that any material aid from China to Moscow’s
war effort would result in economic reprisals.
Keeping China in his corner is
a priority for Mr. Putin, with Russia looking to Beijing as a critical trading partner
in the face of Western sanctions. In an apparent nod to China’s discomfort with
being seen as a military ally, Mr. Putin said in his televised opening remarks to
Mr. Wang that “economic issues” were “above all” the field in which the two countries’
relationship was “reaching new frontiers.”
Still, Chinese and Russian naval
ships are holding drills off the coast of South Africa this week — a reminder that
the two countries are also deepening their military cooperation.
Mr. Putin, at least economically,
is clearly the junior member of the partnership. It is the reverse of Soviet days,
when few imagined that China might become the world’s second-largest economy.
In the view of American officials,
Mr. Xi has his doubts about supporting Russia’s invasion, but is happy to aid Mr.
Putin both to distract the United States from its economic competition with Beijing
and to tie up the American military resources being used to support Ukraine.
Mr. Biden used his session with
the allies at Warsaw’s royal castle to repeat his vow to “defend literally every
inch of NATO.” So far, the Kremlin has not struck outside Ukraine’s borders, but
that restraint has not extended to cyberspace: Google recently reported that cyberstrikes from Russia on computer users in NATO countries
in 2022 were up 300 percent over the same period in 2020.
Mr. Biden, who championed the
post-Cold War order as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and as
vice president, used the meeting in Warsaw to underscore how much the world has
altered in a year.
“The idea that over 100,000 forces
would invade another country — since World War II, nothing like that has happened,’’
Mr. Biden said. “Things have changed radically. And we have to, we have to make
sure we change them back.”
Mr. Putin offered a starkly different
message, saying that he was restoring Russia to its rightful place, and reassembling
territories he contends are part of the Russian empire. Yet Mr. Putin’s public events
Wednesday spoke to some of the risks of his stuttering war, whose
precise aims he did little to clarify in his 100-minute state-of-the-nation address
the day before.
Mr. Wang arrived in Moscow after
visiting Western European countries, where he sought to persuade their leaders that
Beijing wants to encourage an end to the war in Ukraine. But Mr. Wang’s published
remarks to Mr. Putin and other Russian officials indicated that Beijing will not
risk its friendship with Moscow over Ukraine.
“Both sides engaged in a thorough
exchange of views about the Ukraine issue,” the Chinese Foreign Ministry said. Mr.
Wang, it said, “approved of Russia’s reaffirmation that it is willing to resolve
the issue through dialogue and negotiations.”
After the meeting, Mr. Putin
tended to the home front. He walked onto a stage at the Moscow stadium that hosted
the 2018 World Cup men’s soccer final and told the Russians in the stands — many
of them bused-in students and government workers — that their soldiers were fighting
“on our historical borders, for our people.”
“Russia!” Mr. Putin blared into
his microphone, leading the crowd in a chant.
The official occasion was a Kremlin-organized
celebration of a military holiday, Defenders of the Fatherland Day. But it appeared
a clear effort by Mr. Putin to show his country and the world a stamp of public
approval a day after his state-of-the-nation speech, in which he painted a picture
of war as the country’s new normal.
“All our people are defenders
of the fatherland,” Mr. Putin said at the rally. “When we are united, we have no
equal.”
At Mr. Biden’s meeting with NATO
leaders, the message was plain enough: If Mr. Putin were to order tanks into other
European countries, the nine nations along the military alliance’s eastern flank
would be the likeliest targets.
With Mr. Biden listening, President
Klaus Iohannis of Romania urged the group to stand firmly behind Ukraine, in part
as a way of securing peace for the people living in the shadow of Russia.
“The war has brought nothing
but suffering and despair, killing and displacing of millions of Ukrainians, unprecedented
destruction and uncertainty,” Mr. Iohannis said. “We the leaders of the eastern
flank have the duty to stand firm in defense of our peace.”
In a speech from the royal castle
in Warsaw on Tuesday, Mr. Biden was resolute about American commitment to the defense of NATO allies, declaring that the guarantee to come
to the aid of any threatened ally “is rock solid.”
“And every member of NATO knows
it,” he said. “And Russia knows it as well.”
But the threat of direct military
intervention is less theoretical for Poland, Hungary and the other countries whose
borders lie not far from Russian territory than for Britain, France or Spain.
After the meeting, Mr. Biden
departed Poland for Washington, concluding a foreign trip that began with a top-secret
visit to Ukraine’s capital and ended with declarations of unity but a looming sense
of uncertainty about the future.