Russia Offers Ukraine Wheat to Africa and South Asia through Black
Sea Ports
·
Ukraine and US Urges Import Countries
to Refrain from Buying “Stolen” Grain
American diplomats have alerted 14 countries, most in Africa, that Russian ships filled with stolen Ukrainian
grain could be headed their way, posing a dilemma to countries facing dire food
shortages.
Russia has bombed, blockaded and plundered the grain production
capacity of Ukraine, which accounts for one-tenth of global wheat exports,
resulting in dire
forecasts of increased hunger and of
spiking food prices around the world.
Now, the United States has warned that the Kremlin is
trying to profit from that plunder by selling stolen wheat to drought-stricken
countries in Africa, some facing possible famine.
In mid-May, the United States sent an alert to 14 countries,
mostly in Africa, that Russian cargo vessels were leaving ports near Ukraine
laden with what a State Department cable described as “stolen Ukrainian grain.”
The cable identified by name three Russian cargo vessels it said were suspected
of transporting it.
The American alert about the grain has only sharpened the
dilemma for African countries, many already feeling trapped between East and
West, as they potentially face a hard choice between, on one hand, benefiting
from possible war crimes and displeasing a powerful Western ally, and on the
other, refusing cheap food at a time when wheat prices are soaring and hundreds
of thousands of people are starving.
The alarm sounded by Washington reinforced Ukrainian
government accusations that Russia has stolen up to 500,000 tons of Ukrainian
wheat, worth $100 million, since Russia’s invasion in February. Much of it has
been trucked to ports in Russia-controlled Crimea, then transferred to ships,
including some under Western sanctions, Ukrainian officials say.
On Friday, the head of the African Union, President Macky Sall of Senegal, met
in Russia with President Vladimir V.
Putin, in an effort to secure grain supplies from the country.
Critics said the trip, during which Mr. Sall referred to his “dear friend Vladimir,” played
straight into Mr. Putin’s hands by offering him yet another tool to leverage
divisions in the international response to his brutal assault on Ukraine.
But many
African nations are already ambivalent
about the punishing Western campaign of sanctions against Russia for reasons
that include their dependence on Russian arms sales, lingering Cold War-era
sympathies and perceptions of Western double standards.
On top of that, the continent is suffering badly.
Russia and Ukraine normally supply about 40 percent of
wheat needs in Africa, where prices for the grain have risen 23 percent in the
past year, the United Nations says. In the Horn of Africa region, a devastating
drought has left 17 million people hungry, mostly in parts of Somalia, Ethiopia
and Kenya, according to the United Nations. More than 200,000 people in Somalia
are on the brink of famine.
Faced with such pressing need, many African countries are
unlikely to hesitate before buying Russian-supplied grain, no matter where it
comes from, said Hassan Khannenje, director of the
HORN International Institute for Strategic Studies, a research body in Kenya.
“This is not a dilemma,” Mr. Khannenje
said. “Africans don’t care where they get their food from, and if someone is
going to moralize about that, they are mistaken.”
“The need for food is so severe,” he added, “that it’s
not something they need to debate.”
Ukrainian officials said the solution to Africa’s food
problem is greater global pressure to end the war, not purchases of looted
grain. There is a “simple answer,” Taras Vysotsky, Ukraine’s deputy minister of agriculture, said:
“Stop
Mr. Vysotsky and other
Ukrainian ministers have been accusing Russia for months of stealing grain from
the territories it occupies in the country’s southern breadbasket, described by
one as “outright robbery.” Much of it has been taken from storage elevators in
occupied parts of the Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk
and Luhansk regions, they say.
“There is nothing left to steal,” Mr. Vysotsky
said in an interview.
The first reports of grain plunder emerged in mid-March.
Commentators on Russian state TV stations have since openly boasted
about the seizures, saying that Russia intends to continue with them.
The Russians also stole an estimated $15 million to $20
million worth of agricultural machinery, Mr. Vysotsky
said.
Much of the looted grain, according Ukrainian officials,
ends up at ports like Sevastopol on the Crimean peninsula, which Russia has
occupied since 2014.
At least 10 boats have exported stolen grain, mostly
wheat, through Sevastopol’s port since late February, according to the
Ukrainians who are tracking shipments on the SeaKrime
project run by the open-source investigation website Myrotvorets.
Marine tracking websites, and experts who monitor the
vessels, said the ships, some under
U.S. sanctions since April, often turn off
their transponders until they are at sea, likely to hide their port of
departure. But they still show up in satellite images or are photographed by
spotters on the ground.
In the past month, the three Russian vessels identified
in the State Department cable as suspected carriers of stolen Ukrainian grain —
the Matros Koshka, Matros Pozynich and Mikhail Nenashev — traveled between the Straits of Kerch, which
divide Crimea and Russia, and various ports in the eastern Mediterranean.
Sometimes they docked in Turkey or Syria; other times,
according to websites that track marine traffic, they turned off their
transponders while crossing the Mediterranean, possibly to hide their final
destination.
Two U.S. officials confirmed the contents of the cable,
which was sent on May 16 to 14 countries, mostly in northern and eastern
Africa, as well as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Turkey.
Determining the provenance of a grain shipment is not
straightforward, but one indication might be if Russia were selling it at a
heavy discount, one American official said.
In an email, a State Department spokesman declined to
comment on the cable’s contents, but pointed to the Ukrainian reports of
wholesale grain theft, as well as “numerous testimonies from Ukrainian farmers
and documentary evidence showing Russia’s theft of Ukrainian grain.”
“The United States is working with other countries to
prevent the sale of grain that has likely been stolen from Ukraine,” the
spokesman said.
Several foreign officials said the United States had
asked them to ensure their country did not buy stolen Ukrainian grain, with the
request made in a spirit of cooperation, not coercion. In Pakistan, which is
considering buying two million tons of wheat from Russia, a senior foreign
office official said the Americans stressed Pakistan’s sovereignty when they
asked for help.
Turkey is a focus of the efforts to track stolen
Ukrainian grain because Russian vessels leaving Crimea usually pass through
Turkish waters. On Friday, Ukraine’s ambassador to Turkey called on the
authorities to investigate the source of Russian-transported grain.
In Washington, a spokesman for the National Security
Council said the United States had information that Russian forces had been
regularly damaging facilities used to hold grain in eastern Ukraine.
On top of that, a Russian naval blockade has prevented
Ukraine from exporting the wheat it still has. Ukrainian officials say about 20
million tons of grain are waiting for export in the Ukrainian-held port of
Odesa.
The National Security Council provided a declassified map
showing clusters of Russian warships in the Black Sea south of Odesa preventing
Ukrainian cargo ships from leaving.
For many Ukrainians, the theft of the grain — and its
unlawful export — recall the traumatic famine of 1932-33 when Ukraine was part
of the Soviet Union, and Ukrainian peasants had their grain expropriated. Four
million people died, in the hunger known as the Holodomor.
Throughout the Ukraine crisis, many African countries
have felt treated as an afterthought, caught between foreign powers engaged in
a new round of Cold War-style rivalry. Over the weekend, several refused to
discuss the American alert about stolen Ukrainian grain.
Macharia Kamau, the principal secretary
at the Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, denied Kenya had received any
message. “Why would they need to warn us in the first place?” he texted. “Why
would anyone buy looted anything? This sounds like a propaganda ploy.”
Mindi Kasiga, a spokeswoman at
Tanzania’s Foreign Ministry, said her country’s stance “has always been
neutral.”
Across much of Africa, any Western pressure over
Russian-supplied grain is likely to backfire, said Mr. Khannenje,
the analyst, unless the West could offer a means of bridging the wheat
shortfall.
“If the West can provide alternatives, countries will
listen to that,” he said. “But being hysterical about it is only going to push
them further into the arms of Russia.”