CBEC Issues
Clarification on Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Scheme
[Ref: F. No. B1/19/2013-TRU
(Pt.) dated 11th December 2013]
Sub: The Service Tax
Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme – issues for clarification.
The undersigned is directed
to state that the Board has issued clarifications on issues concerning various
aspects of the VCES, vide circulars dated 13.05.2013, 8.08.2013 and 25.11.2013.
A FAQ has also been issued on VCES. However, certain instances have come to
notice, as mentioned below, that the declarants under the VCES are still facing
difficulties.
2. In one instance, the Designated
Authority has asked a declarant, who has “tax dues” only for a part of the
period covered by the Scheme, to furnish an undertaking that he had no unpaid
“tax dues” for the remaining period covered by the Scheme. However, the Scheme
does not envisage furnishing of any such undertaking. A declarant may have tax
dues only for a part period covered by the Scheme. In terms of the Scheme a
declaration of tax dues has to be made in Form VCES-I, which includes an
undertaking that the information given in the declaration is correct and
complete. Therefore, the Designated Authority should not ask for any other
undertaking or declaration beyond what has been prescribed in the Scheme or
Rules made there under.
3. In another instance, the
Designated Authority has objected to the payment of the first tranche of 50%,
payable by 31.12.2013, in installments. It is clarified that the Scheme only
prescribes that the declarant would pay a minimum amount of 50% of the tax dues
by 31.12.2013. Rest of the payment may be made by 30.6.2014, without any
interest, and any amount remaining unpaid on 30.6.2014 shall be paid by
31.12.2014, with interest for the period of delay beyond 30.6.2014. There is no
bar to pay these amounts in installments. For example a declarant may pay the
50% amount that he is required to pay by 31.12.2013 in more than one
installment. Therefore, payment of 50% “tax dues” in lump-sum may not be
insisted to.
4. In some instances, it has been
observed that the Designated Authority has raised frivolous/unnecessary queries
as regards the veracity and the manner of calculation of tax dues. While the
designated authority may cause arithmetical check as regards the correctness of
computation of tax dues, the Scheme does not envisage investigation by the
designated authority into the veracity of declaration. Only if the Commissioner
has reason to believe that the declaration filed by the declarant is
substantially false he may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, serve notice
on the declarant requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the tax dues
not paid or short-paid.