Senate
Confirms Garcetti as Ambassador to India, Capping a Two-Year Fight
Despite concerns
among some Democrats about claims that the former Los Angeles mayor condoned sexual
harassment by an aide, several Republicans supported him, saving his confirmation
from collapse.
The Senate on Wednesday confirmed
Eric Garcetti, the former mayor of Los Angeles, to be the U.S. ambassador to India,
ending a two-year saga that left a top diplomatic post vacant amid allegations that
he mishandled workplace misconduct and sexual harassment.
Mr. Garcetti was confirmed by
a vote of 52 to 42, with a few Democratic senators who had expressed deep reservations
voting “no” but several more Republicans voting in favor
of moving forward, effectively saving Mr. Garcetti’s bid from collapse.
It was a victory for President
Biden, who stuck by his political ally in the face of the allegations and the prolonged
process that has left the United States without a permanent envoy in one of the
world’s most populous and geopolitically important democracies.
“The United States-India relationship
is extremely important,” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority
leader, said after a test vote earlier on Wednesday. “It’s a very good thing we
now have an ambassador.” He offered no specific praise for Mr. Garcetti.
Mr. Garcetti, who dropped a presidential
exploratory bid in 2019 to become an early backer of Mr. Biden’s
campaign, had been on the shortlist for a number of cabinet posts before the president
nominated him to be the ambassador to India.
But his nomination languished
amid a Republican blockade of Mr. Biden’s Senate-confirmed nominees. It sank further after
Senate Republicans produced an investigative
report last year that found “numerous credible allegations from
multiple whistle-blowers” of misconduct by a top aide to Mr. Garcetti, and asserted
that “it is more likely than not that Mayor Garcetti either had personal knowledge
of the sexual harassment or should have been aware of it.”
Mr. Garcetti has consistently
denied the accusations, and the White House has dismissed them as partisan attacks,
but they effectively stalled action in the Senate, leaving Mr. Garcetti’s fate up
in the air. The nomination died at the end of the last Congress, and in January,
Mr. Biden renominated Mr. Garcetti.
In an interview on Wednesday,
Mr. Garcetti said he never considered withdrawing his name from contention and that
Mr. Biden had encouraged him to stay the course, despite the delays.
“I had check-ins with the president,
and he was 100 percent behind me,” Mr. Garcetti said. “They said, ‘We believe in
you and we want you here.’ They said, ‘It’s going to take some hard work, but we
think you should serve.’”
In recent days, Mr. Garcetti’s
nomination appeared to have picked up momentum. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee
last week approved it with the support of two Republicans, Senators Todd Young of
Indiana and Bill Hagerty of Tennessee. Mr. Garcetti and his allies were optimistic
that the precarious nomination was moving in the right direction.
But resistance remained among
most Republicans, and as a vote of the full Senate approached, some Democrats voiced
concerns.
Speaking at a fund-raiser in
Nevada on Tuesday night, Mr. Biden called it an “important vote.” White House officials
had been reaching out to senators to press Mr. Garcetti’s case, in an attempt to
put him over the top in what they expected to be a close vote.
In those calls, Mr. Biden’s team
underscored his qualifications and the fact he had twice been approved in committee
votes on a bipartisan basis, according to White House officials. Lawmakers on both
sides of the aisle asked the White House about the accusations facing Mr. Garcetti.
The White House made Mr. Garcetti available to some members for one-on-one conversations.
On Capitol Hill, Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, served as one of Mr.
Garcetti’s main allies securing votes on his behalf.
On Wednesday, seven Republicans
joined most Democrats in supporting him, while three Democrats — Senators Mazie
K. Hirono of Hawaii, Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Mark Kelly of Arizona — broke with
the party to oppose him. The backing of the Republicans — Lindsey Graham of South
Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine, Steve Daines of Montana,
Roger Marshall of Kansas, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Mr. Hagerty and Mr. Young —
was enough for the nomination to advance.
Mr. Garcetti’s allies said they
were happy to have the divisive fight over his nomination over with.
“This whole delay has hurt our
ability to deepen our strategic partnership with India,” said Representative Ro
Khanna, Democrat of California, a co-chair of the Congressional India Caucus. “I
am looking forward to working with Eric to strengthen our ties to India at a time
we face Putin’s war and heightened tensions with Xi Jinping.”
Mr. Garcetti himself was never
accused of misconduct. But a former member his security detail, who has sued
the city, accused his former deputy chief of staff of sexual harassment.
The officer and a second former city employee, who served as communications director,
said that Rick Jacobs, a prominent Democratic fund-raiser in the Los Angeles gay
community and top mayoral adviser, had made sexual remarks and gestures and had
acted inappropriately toward subordinates. They claimed that Mr. Garcetti had known
and had failed to act on complaints about it.
In the days leading up to the
vote, another person who claimed to have been harassed and assaulted by Mr. Jacobs
shared personal stories with the chiefs of staff of Democratic and Republican senators.
The person insisted on anonymity for fear of retaliation.
Those conversations appeared
to have swayed some senators. Ms. Hirono had previously indicated she planned to
support Mr. Garcetti. But on Wednesday she said in a statement that “earlier this
week I received additional information that, when taken in its totality with the
information already available, has led me to be a ‘no’ on Mr. Garcetti’s nomination.”
Mr. Garcetti has said that he
“never witnessed” the alleged harassment, and that none of those incidents were
ever brought to his attention. He added that, had he known, he would have acted
to stop it because addressing abuse in the workplace is “a core issue” for him.
But the nomination hit a snag
when Naomi Seligman, his former communications director, began publicly pressing
to hold him accountable for alleged misconduct in his office and Senator Charles
E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, released the 23-page report detailing sexual harassment
allegations against Mr. Garcetti’s former aide and the likelihood that Mr. Garcetti
knew or should have been aware.
“Senators on both sides of the
aisle have seen extensive credible evidence that Mr. Garcetti enabled a sexual predator
at City Hall for years and lied about it in his confirmation hearing,” Ms. Seligman
said in a statement. “If it weren’t for political pressure from the White House,
this nomination would never reach the Senate floor.”
The White House called the report
“partisan” and “a hit job from the beginning,” adding that “many of the claims have
already been conclusively debunked by more serious independent reports.” Mr. Garcetti’s
parents — his father is a former Los Angeles County district attorney — spent at
least $90,000 on a lobbyist to defend him.
Mr. Garcetti said Wednesday that
the process was “a long road, but a great destination,” noting that he studied Hindi
in college and that as mayor he worked with his Indian counterparts “on everything
from energy to ports to culture and urbanization.”
He added: “I think I was in tears
at the end. There were times it was trying, but I always understood the political
process takes time.”
Of the claims that he mishandled
harassment and abuse in his office, he said, “Repeating untruths doesn’t make them
true.”