Summary of Economic Survey-2020-21
·
V-Shaped Economic Recovery Due to Mega Vaccination Drive, Robust
Recovery in the Services Sector and Robust Growth in Consumption and Investment
·
V-Shaped Recovery is Due to Resurgence in High Frequency Indicators
Such as Power Demand, Rail Freight, E-Way Bills, GST Collection, Steel
Consumption, Etc
·
India to Become the Fastest Growing Economy in Next Two Years as
Per IMF
·
India’s GDP is Estimated to Contract by 7.7 Per Cent in
FY2020-21
·
Agriculture to Clock 3.4 Per Cent Growth, While Industry and
Services to Contract by 9.6 Per Cent and 8.8 Per Cent Respectively this Year
This Year
·
India to Have a Current Account Surplus of 2 Per Cent of GDP in
FY21, A Historic High After 17 Years
·
Net FPI Inflows Recorded an All-Time Monthly High of 9.8 Billion
Dollars in November 2020
·
Scores of lives saved and V-Shaped Economic Recovery bear
Testimony to India’s Boldness in taking Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain.
Posted On: 29 JAN 2021 3:48PM by PIB Delhi
India’s real GDP to record a growth of 11 per
cent in 2021-22 and nominal GDP by 15.4 per cent-the highest since
independence. The V-shaped economic recovery is supported by the initiation of
a mega vaccination drive with hopes of a robust recovery in the services sector
and prospects for robust growth in consumption and investment. The Union
Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs, Smt
Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Economic Survey
2020-21 in Parliament today, which states that the rebound will be led by the
low base and continued normalization in economic activities as the rollout of
COVID-19 vaccines gathers traction. The fundamentals of the economy remain
strong as gradual scaling back of lockdowns along with the astute support of Atmanirbhar Bharat Mission have placed the economy firmly
on the path of revival. This path would entail a growth in real GDP by 2.4
percent over the absolute level of 2019-20-implying that the economy would take
two years to reach and go past the pre-pandemic level. These projections are in
line with IMF estimate of real GDP growth of 11.5 per cent in 2021-22 for India
and 6.8 per cent in 2022-23. India is expected to emerge as the fastest growing
economy in the next two years as per IMF.
The Survey says, India’s mature policy
response to this “once-in-a-century” crisis provides
important lessons for democracies to avoid myopic policymaking and demonstrates
the significant benefits of focusing on long-term gains. India adopted a
unique four-pillar strategy of containment, fiscal, financial, and long-term
structural reforms. Calibrated fiscal and monetary support was provided given
the evolving economic situation, cushioning the vulnerable in the lockdown and
boosting consumption and investment while unlocking, mindful of fiscal repercussions
and entailing debt sustainability. A favorable monetary policy ensured abundant
liquidity and immediate relief to debtors via temporary moratoria, while
unclogging monetary policy transmission.
The Survey says, India’s GDP is estimated to
contract by 7.7 per cent in FY2020-21, composed of a sharp 15.7 per cent
decline in first half and a modest 0.1 per cent fall in the second half.
Sector-wise, agriculture has remained the silver lining while contact-based
services, manufacturing, construction were hit hardest, and have been
recovering steadily. Government consumption and net exports have cushioned the
growth from diving further down.
As anticipated, while the lockdown resulted in
a 23.9 per cent contraction in GDP in Q1, the recovery has been a V-shaped one
as seen in the 7.5 per cent decline in Q2 and the recovery across all key
economic indicators. Starting July, a resilient V-shaped recovery is underway,
as demonstrated by the recovery in GDP growth in Q2 after the sharp decline in
Q1. As India’s mobility and pandemic trends aligned and improved concomitantly,
indicators like E-way bills, rail freight, GST collections and power
consumption not only reached pre-pandemic levels but also surpassed previous
year levels. The reignited inter and intra state movement and record-high
monthly GST collections have marked the unlocking of industrial and commercial
activity. A sharp rise in commercial paper issuances, easing yields, and sturdy
credit growth to MSMEs portend revamped credit flows for enterprises to survive
and grow.
Dwelling on the sectoral trends, the Survey
says that the year also saw manufacturing sector’s resilience, rural demand
cushioning overall economic activity and structural consumption shifts in
booming digital transactions. It adds that Agriculture is set to cushion the
shock of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Indian economy in 2020-21 with a growth
of 3.4 per cent in both Q1 and Q2. A series of progressive reforms undertaken
by the government have contributed to nourishing a vibrant agricultural sector,
which remains a silver lining to India’s growth story of FY 2020-21.
A palpable V-shaped recovery in industrial
production was observed over the year. Manufacturing rebounded and industrial
value started to normalize. Indian services sector sustained its recovery from
the pandemic driven declines with PMI Services output and new business rising
for the third straight month in December.
Bank credit remained subdued in FY 2020-21
amid risk aversion and muted credit appetite. However, credit growth to
agriculture and allied activities accelerated to 7.4 per cent in October 2020
from 7.1 per cent in October 2019. October 2020 saw resilient credit flows to
sectors such as construction, trade and hospitality, while bank credit remained
muted to the manufacturing sector. Credit growth
to the services sector accelerated to 9.5 per cent in October 2020 from 6.5 per
cent in October 2019.
High food prices remained a major driver of
inflation in 2020. However, inflation in December, 2020 fell back into the
RBI’s target range of 4+/-2 per cent to reach 4.6 per cent to reach 4.6 per
cent year-on-year as compared to 6.9 per cent in November. This was driven by a
step fall in food prices, particularly of vegetables, cereals, and protein
products and favorable base effects.
The external sector provided an effective
cushion to growth with India recording a current account surplus of 3.1 per
cent of GDP in the first half of the year, largely supported by strong services
exports, and weak demand leading to a sharper contraction in imports (with
merchandise imports contracting by 39.7%) than exports (with merchandise
exports contracting by 21.2%). Consequently, the Foreign exchange reserves rose
to cover 18 months of imports in December 2020.
External debt as a ratio to GDP rose
marginally to 21.6 per cent at end-September 2020 from 20.6 per cent at
end-March 2020. However, the ratio of foreign exchange reserves to total and
short-term debt (original and residual) improved because of the sizable
accretion in reserves.
India remained a preferred investment
destination in FY 2020-21 with FDI pouring in amidst global asset shifts
towards equities and prospects of quicker recovery in emerging economies. Net
FPI inflows recorded an all-time monthly high of US$ 9.8 billion in November
2020, as investors’ risk appetite returned, with a renewed search for yield,
and US dollar weakened amid global monetary easing and fiscal stimulus
packages. India was the only country among emerging markets to receive equity
FII inflows in 2020.
Buoyant Sensex and NIFTY resulted in India’s
market-capitalisation to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
ratio crossing 100 per cent for the first time since October 2010. This,
however, raises concerns on the disconnect between the
financial markets and real sector.
Exports are expected to decline by 5.8 per
cent and imports by 11.3 per cent in the second half of the year. India is
expected to have a Current Account Surplus of 2 per cent of GDP in FY21, a
historic high after 17 years.
On the supply side, Gross Value Added (GVA)
growth is pegged at -7.2 per cent in 2020-21 as against 3.9 per cent in FY:2019-20. Agriculture is set to cushion the shock of the
Covid-19 pandemic on the Indian economy in 2020-21 with a growth of 3.4 per
cent, while industry and services are estimated to contract by 9.6 per cent and
8.8 per cent during the year.
The Survey underlines that the year 2020 was
dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing global economic downturn,
the most severe one since the Global Financial Crisis. The lockdowns and social
distancing norms brought the already slowing global economy to a standstill.
Global economic output is estimated to fall by 3.5 percent in 2020 (IMF January
2021 estimates). In view of this, Governments and central banks across the
world deployed a range of policy tools to support their economies such as
lowering key policy rates, quantitative easing measures, loan guarantees, cash
transfers and fiscal stimulus measures. India recognized the disruptive impact
of the pandemic and charted its own unique path amidst dismal projections by
several international institutions of the spread in the country given its huge
population, high population density and an overburdened health infrastructure.
The Survey observes that the intense lockdown
implemented at the start of the pandemic – when India had only a 100 confirmed
cases – characterized India’s unique response in several ways. First, the
policy response was driven by the findings from both epidemiological and economic
research. Specifically, faced with enormous uncertainty about the potential
spread of the pandemic, the policy implemented the Nobel-prize winning research
in Hansen and Sargent (2001) that recommends a policy focussed
on minimising losses in a worst case scenario. Faced
with an unprecedented pandemic, loss of scores of human lives captured this
worst case scenario. Moreover, epidemiological research highlighted the
importance of an initial, stringent lockdown especially in a country where high
population density posed difficulties with respect to social distancing.
Therefore, India’s policy humane response that focused on saving human lives, recognised that the short-term pain of an initial,
stringent lockdown would lead to long-term gains both in the lives saved and in
the pace of the economic recovery. The scores of lives that have been saved and
the V-shaped economic recovery that is being witnessed
bear testimony to India’s boldness in taking short-term pain for
long-term gain.
Second, India recognised
that the pandemic impacts both supply and demand in the economy. The slew of
reforms – again unique amidst all major economies – were implemented to ensure
that the supply-side disruptions, which were inevitable during the lockdown,
are minimized in the medium to long-run. The demand side policy reflected the
understanding that aggregate demand, especially that
for non-essential items, reflects precautionary motives to save, which
inevitably remains high when overall uncertainty is high. Therefore, during the
initial months of the pandemic when uncertainty was high and lockdowns imposed
economic restrictions, India did not waste precious fiscal resources in trying
to pump up discretionary consumption. Instead, the policy focused on ensuring
that all essentials were taken care of, which included direct benefit transfers
to the vulnerable sections and the world’s largest food subsidy programme targeting 80.96 crore beneficiaries. Government
of India also launched Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme to provide much
needed relief to stressed sectors by helping entities sustain employment and
meet liabilities.
During the unlock phase, when uncertainty
declined and the precautionary motive to save subsided, on the one hand, and
economic mobility increased, on the other hand, India has ramped up its fiscal
spending. A favorable monetary policy ensured abundant liquidity and immediate
relief to debtors via temporary moratoria, while unclogging monetary policy
transmission. India’s demand-side policy, thus, underscores the idea that
pressing on the accelerator while the brakes are clamped only wastes scarce
fuel.
The year 2020 threw at the world a bedlam of
novel COVID-19 virus, threatening all that was taken for granted –mobility,
safety, and a normal life itself. This, in turn, posed the most formidable
economic challenge to India and to the world in a century. Bereft of a cure or
a vaccine, public health policy became central to tackling this all-pervasive
crisis. The imperative of flattening the disease curve was entwined with the
livelihood cost of an imminent recession, which emanated from the restrictions
in economic activities from the lockdown required to contain the pandemic. This
inherent trade-off led to the policy dilemma of “lives versus livelihoods”.