Tobacco Plain Packaging Debate Heats Up
Again
Members at the TRIPS Council meeting also addressed
a proposed New Zealand law that, if implemented, would require plain packaging
for tobacco products. The controversial legislation would require standardised
packaging without trademarks, a drab monotone design, and prominent health
warnings on cigarette packaging, with only a small line of text to distinguish
one brand from another.
At this week’s meeting, the Dominican Republic -
whose main export is tobacco - took the lead in commenting on the draft
legislation, saying that it would hinder employment and would force producers
to compete based on price instead of quality.
The Dominican Republic, Honduras, and Ukraine have
each lodged separate complaints with the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
over a similar piece of legislation that has already been enacted in Australia.
The three members have argued that the law is inconsistent with the WTO’s intellectual
property rules and could have large negative impacts on local industries. (DS441, DS435, and DS434, respectively).
Australian officials have, in turn, responded that
the law is necessary for achieving public health objectives and is in line with
the 2001 Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health and the WHO Framework
Convention on Tobacco Control.
A dispute panel has already been established for
Ukraine’s complaint against Australia; once the other two complainants lodge
their second panel requests, a joint panel will be composed to hear the WTO
cases together. Given that the Australian disputes are currently unresolved,
the Dominican Republic urged New Zealand to wait for the final outcome of these
cases before adopting its plain packaging legislation.
In response, New Zealand said it would continue
developing the planned legislation - which is currently in the drafting stage -
but may wait to see the outcome of the dispute before implementing it, echoing
recent comments made by the country’s prime minister, John Key. It also
recalled that the 2001 Doha Declaration says that TRIPS does not and should not
prevent members from taking measures supportive of public health.