Trump Withdraws
from TPP, Bilateralism Back with a Vengeance
Donald
Trump signed a presidential memorandum confirming the U.S. withdrawal from the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Among his targets of criticism were the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) of 1994 and the United States accepting
China into the World Trade Organisation in 2001. TPP
was successfully agreed only last February and was awaiting ratification from
Congress.
TPP is a weighty and complex agreement negotiated
painstakingly by 12 countries: the United States, Canada, Mexico, Peru, and Chile
in the Americas, and Japan, Australia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei,
and New Zealand in the Asia-Pacific. Together, they comprise almost 40 percent
of the world’s gross domestic product. A TPP minus America is impossible. A TPP
would have balanced China, now the members are on their own.
There are several common misconceptions about TPP. One
is that it is simply a trade agreement, when it is actually much more than
that. TPP measures on anti-corruption measures, intellectual property
obligations, human rights and child labour
conditions, and environmental commitments would have isolated China. India with
the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) - which
includes China and India, but excludes the United States - are not entirely
apt. Countries that are party to both negotiations - Japan, Australia,
Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, Vietnam, and New Zealand – may better off now with
no competing TPP.
Trump said that Trump exploited, is that TPP would lead
to a loss of U.S. jobs. The rationale Trump has given for withdrawing from TPP
is that it disadvantaged American industry, workers, and wages, and that he
believes in dealing “directly with individual countries on a one-on-one
(bilateral) basis in negotiating future trade deals.”
U.S. industry and other TPP members will be
disappointed. Indeed, this could be seen as a massive self-goal for the United
States. Trump’s decision has already been criticized by some American political
leaders, including fellow members of the Republican Party.
President
Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday pulling the United States out of
the TPP. Leaders from some TPP nations pledged Tuesday to make attempts to
continue the agreement even without the U.S.
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said he had
discussed the TPP’s future with the leaders of Japan, Singapore and New
Zealand.
Turnbull added that with America now out of the
agreement, “Certainly there is potential for China to join the TPP.”
In Beijing, a foreign ministry spokeswoman would not
say whether China would now attempt to join the TPP. She said China believes
that all nations “should keep going down the path of open, inclusive,
continuous” economic development.
In the past, China has proposed an alternative to the
TPP, a trade group called the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP).
There are 11 remaining TPP members, including Japan,
Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam. The others are Canada,
Mexico, Chile, Peru and Brunei.
Last week, Japan’s parliament approved the TPP. But
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has said that
without the U.S., it would become “meaningless.”