US Taking India at WTO on Solar Panel Products on Local Value Add
and Subsidies
United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk
announced on 6 February that the United States has requested World Trade
Organization (WTO) dispute settlement consultations with the Government of
India concerning domestic content requirements in India’s national solar
program. India’s program appears to discriminate against U.S. solar equipment
by requiring solar energy producers to use Indian-manufactured solar cells and
modules and by offering subsidies to those developers for using domestic
equipment instead of imports. These forced localization requirements of India’s
national solar program restrict India’s market to U.S. imports. Tackling these
barriers is a top priority of the Obama Administration.
“The Obama Administration is committed to
strengthening the American clean energy sector and preserving the millions of
jobs it supports, ”said Ambassador Kirk. “Trade
enforcement is critical for ensuring that our clean energy goods and services
can compete on an equal footing around the world. As today’s action
demonstrates, we will not hesitate to enforce our rights under our trade
agreements on behalf of American workers and manufacturers.”
Consultations are the first step in the WTO dispute
settlement process, and parties are encouraged to agree to a solution at this
stage. Under WTO rules, if the matter is not resolved through consultations
within 60 days, the United States may request the establishment of a WTO
dispute settlement panel.
The Interagency Trade Enforcement Center (ITEC), created by this Administration to enhance
U.S. trade enforcement capabilities, provided key support to USTR’s monitoring
and enforcement unit in the development and initiation of this dispute.
Background
On January 11, 2010, India launched its national
solar policy, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM). Phase I of
that national policy is composed of two parts: Batch 1 and Batch 2. Under Batch
1, India required developers of solar photovoltaic (“PV”) projects employing
crystalline silicon technology to use solar modules manufactured in India.
Subsequently, under Batch 2, India expanded this domestic sourcing requirement
to crystalline silicon solar cells as well. In its draft policy for Phase II of
the JNNSM, India has stated that it is considering expanding the scope of the
domestic content requirements further to include solar thin film technologies,
which currently comprise the majority of U.S. solar exports to India. India
also offers solar energy developers participating in the JNNSM a guarantee that
the government will purchase a certain amount of solar power at a highly
subsidized tariff rate, provided that they use domestically manufactured solar
equipment instead of imports.
These elements of India’s national solar policy
appear to be inconsistent with India’s obligations under the WTO agreements.
These obligations include Article III of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994 (GATT 1994), which generally prohibits measures that discriminate in
favor of domestically produced goods versus imports;
Article 2 of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures, which
prohibits trade-related investment measures that are inconsistent with GATT
Article III; Article 3 of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing
Measures (SCM Agreement), which prohibits conditioning a subsidy on the use of
domestic over imported goods; and Article 5 of the SCM Agreement, which
prohibits causing adverse effects on other WTO Members through subsidies that
discriminate against imported goods.
The United States has engaged India on our concerns
regarding the JNNSM over the last three years, including in bilateral fora such as the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum and the
U.S.-India Energy Dialogue, and at the WTO in various committees.