Unanimous Response on Common IP COVID-19 at WTO
At a formal meeting of the Council for Trade-Related Aspects
of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) on 29 November, members expressed unanimous
support for maintaining the momentum of the discussions on a common intellectual
property (IP) response to COVID-19. Following the decision to postpone the 12th
Ministerial Conference (MC12) amid new coronavirus variant concerns, delegations
committed to continue engaging in various configurations in the coming weeks to
try and harvest any outcome that may still be possible.
The TRIPS Council meeting, which had been convened before
the
announcement of MC12 being indefinitely postponed, saw members sharing the common view that the WTO cannot
afford to lose the momentum that was gathering in the discussions among delegations,
with a view to finding a pragmatic and tangible consensus-based solution on this
issue.
The chair of the Council, Ambassador Dagfinn
Sørli of Norway, said he will consult in the coming days
and weeks with members to help facilitate continued engagement, and with a view
to finding consensus on a substantive solution. This includes by convening small-group
consultations and where necessary meetings open to all members for the purposes
of transparency and inclusiveness.
Members also agreed to keep open in the agenda of the TRIPS
Council the two proposals on the table subject to discussion - the proposal by India
and South Africa (IP/C/W/669/Rev.1)
requesting a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the prevention,
containment and treatment of COVID-19, and the proposal by the European Union (IP/C/W/681) for a draft General Council declaration on the TRIPS Agreement
and Public Health in the circumstances of a pandemic.
The objective of keeping these agenda items open is to enable
re-convening the TRIPS Council at short notice when and if there are indications
that members might be closer to finding a landing zone. The chair said that meeting
rooms have been booked for 10 December and 16 December to reconvene the Council,
should this become appropriate as a result of new developments.
Ambassador Sørli thanked delegations
for their continued engagement in what he characterized as a "complex issue".
He underscored members’ shared view that IP should not be a barrier to access to
medicines, and that governments should be able to permit manufacturers that are
able and ready to produce COVID-19 vaccines to start producing without worrying
about a patent. While acknowledging with regret that members were not able to reach
consensus on a substantive recommendation to the Ministerial Conference, he said
he remained convinced that a pragmatic compromise solution is within reach if there
is political will.
In the absence of political input from ministers in the short
term, Ambassador Sørli called on members not to relent,
as a practical and tangible WTO response to the pandemic is needed now more than
ever. At a time when the pandemic continues to challenge the world's sense of stability,
he urged delegations to remain fully engaged with a sense of urgency and with the
objective of finding a pragmatic outcome. This is the time "to strive, to seek,
to find, and not to yield," he said, quoting Lord Tennyson.
Members supported the approach suggested by the chair to keep
the two agenda items open and agreed that discussions must continue to leverage
the work done over the past weeks and months in trying to find convergence. However,
they reiterated their fundamental differences on questions such as whether a waiver
is the appropriate and most effective way to address the shortage and inequitable
distribution of vaccines and other COVID-19-related products. Differences were also
expressed with regards to the commencement of text-based negotiations.