WTO Reviews SPS on 50 Years of Codex

The calls came in a two-day meeting of the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Committee, which consists of all 159 WTO members and deals with food safety and animal and plant health - measures having an increasing impact on trade.

They echoed a paper circulated by Brazil (document G/SPS/GEN/1253), which described food safety as an important contributor to food security, and said international standards and guidelines should be based on science, that confidence in Codex and other international standards-setting bodies should be strengthened, and that any measures that apply higher standards should also be justified by science.

The discussion of the six new specific trade concerns and the 10 previously raised and discussed in this meeting reflected that theme.

They covered; processed meat, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), restrictions related to the Japanese nuclear plant accident, orchid tissue culture plantlets in flasks, citrus fruits (a complaint by South Africa against the EU about black spot, which is the first dispute settlement case in the International Plant Protection Convention), offal, salmon, pesticide residues, sheepmeat, phthalates (materials added to plastics in food and drink containers) in wines and spirits, shrimp, mad cow disease (BSE), GMO pollen in honey, Indonesia’s port closures, and pine trees and other products (some details below).

Also on the agenda were: six items of information from members, mainly about administrative changes in Australia, the EU and Rep. Korea, but also the horsemeat scandal in the EU and a new Food Safety Act in the Philippines; and Costa Rica’s notification of minimum residue levels for veterinary medicines in live animals (with questions from Panama).

One issue was reported resolved - Slovenia’s concern about Croatia’s measures on pork imports, dating back to 2003 and not reported solved until almost a decade later.

The committee also continued to discuss two long-standing issues in informal consultations immediately before this meeting.

And the committee was introduced to a new publication on invasive alien species and trade rules (see below)

Some details

The SPS Committee’s main task is to monitor how countries are implementing food safety and animal and plant health measures under the WTO Agreement, and to discuss issues arising from that, including the work of recognized international standards-setting bodies. Its deliberations range from comments on specific measures to broader principles.

CODEX anniversary and good scientific practice

Although this was not mentioned specifically in this meeting, the call to shield Codex standards against what some countries consider to be non-scientific considerations, has in the past been raised in the WTO and in Codex itself. This is particularly about ractopamine, a feed additive to encourage growth and leanness in meat. Some countries called on Codex to agree a minimum residue level, which would allow trade. Some others ban ractopamine and for several years blocked a standard in Codex, until it was adopted by a very close vote in 2012.

Developing countries, meanwhile, described Codex’s value in harmonizing standards and in providing technical assistance to help them meet their trading partners’ standards. They called for support for Codex’s trust funds, which enables delegates from poorer countries to participate in the commission’s standards-setting work.

The Dominican Republic, China and Cuba also called for Codex to harmonize private standards, which are stricter than governments’ standards and, they said, are not always based on science.

Lebanon urged Codex to set maximum residue levels for antibiotics and pesticides honey. Lebanese consumers consider honey to be a medicine and cannot accept any residues in honey, the delegate said.

Codex Alimentarius is one of “three sisters” recognized in the WTO’s SPS Agreement as international standards-setting bodies: the other two are the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) for plant health.

The SPS Agreement says SPS measures should either be based on recognized international standards or on scientific assessment of risks if countries prefer to set their own standards. The measures should also avoid unnecessarily obstructing trade.

Specific trade concerns

Among the specific concerns were:

Import restrictions in response to Japan’s nuclear power plant accident. Japan updated members on the latest situation and said radiation levels are generally within normal safety levels, and that any contaminated products could not be traded. Many trading partners have lifted their import restrictions, Japan said. However, restrictions remain in Hong Kong China and Chinese Taipei although Japan is starting to work with them on analysing the situation. China remains a major trading partner that still has import bans and Japan has not been able to discuss this bilaterally, Japan said. China said that only products from seriously polluted areas are affected.

Indonesia’s port closure (see news story on March 2012 meeting and specific trade concern 330 in spsims.wto.org) for fruit and vegetables, raised again by China, which also complained about various import licensing conditions. Support came this time from the EU, South Africa, Rep. Korea, Chile and Chinese Taipei.

Indonesia, which has said Jakarta Port was closed to horticultural imports because it lacked inspection and quarantine facilities, repeated that three other ports are available and that they are also close to population centres.

Invasive alien species

A new study on international trade and invasive alien species has been produced by the Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF), a partnership involving the WTO and other agencies that supports developing countries in building their capacity to implement international sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures.

It includes a recommendation for the SPS Committee to consider developing guidance for countries on the relationship between invasive alien species and the SPS Agreement, so that the legal situation is clear and ensure that dealing with these species can be dealt with in governments’ regulations.

These are some of the trade issues or concerns discussed or information supplied by members. The full agenda is here.

Information from members

    Australia - Release of draft Biosecurity Regulations and Inspector-General of Biosecurity Regulations for comment

    Australia - update on retiring the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS) brand

    European Union - update on the fraud case related to the labelling of horse meat in meat products

    European Union - “Smarter Rules For Safer Food” proposals on animal health, plant health, plant propagating materials and official controls (G/SPS/GEN/1252)

    Republic of Korea - update on reorganization of government agencies

    Philippines - new Food Safety Act passed on 5 June 2013

Specific trade concerns

(Document G/SPS/GEN/204/REV.13)

New issues

    EU temperature treatment requirements for imports of processed meat products - concerns of Russia

    US proposed rule on good manufacturing practice and hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for human food (G/SPS/N/USA/2502) - concerns of China

    EU renewal of GMO approvals (EC regulation 1829/2003) - concerns of Argentina

    Import restrictions in response to the nuclear power plant accident - concerns of Japan

    EU import requirements on orchid tissue culture plantlets in flasks - concerns of Chinese Taipei

    European Union - phytosanitary measures on citrus black spot - concerns of South Africa

Issues previously raised

(Numbers are “specific trade concerns” numbers in the database http://spsims.wto.org/)

    Viet Nam’s ban on offals - concerns of the European Union and the United States (no. 314)

    China’s quarantine and testing procedures for salmon - concerns of Norway (no. 319)

    EU maximum residue levels of pesticides - concerns of India (no. 306)

    Turkey’s requirements for importation of sheepmeat - concerns of Australia (no. 340)

    China’s import conditions related to phthalates - concerns of the European Union (no. 345)

    Japan’s restrictions on shrimp due to anti-oxidant residues - concerns of India (no. 342)

    Import restrictions due to BSE - concerns of the European Union (no. 193)

    EU court of justice ruling regarding pollen derived from GMOs - concerns of Argentina (no. 327)

    Indonesia’s port closure (G/SPS/N/IDN/53, G/SPS/N/IDN/54 and G/SPS/N/IDN/54/CORR.1) - concerns of China (no. 330)

    EU quarantine measures on certain pine trees and other products - concerns of Russia (no. 348)

Consideration of specific notifications received

    Costa Rica’s MRLs for veterinary medicines in live animals (G/SPS/N/CRI/136) - concerns of Panama

Information on resolution of issues

    Croatia’s restrictions on imports of pork - concerns of Slovenia (no. 158)