WTO Report on G20 Shows Moves to Facilitate
Imports even as Trade Restrictions Remain Widespread
While import-restrictive measures introduced by Group of 20 (G20)
economies continue to cover a growing share of trade, the WTO’s latest biannual
monitoring report on trade measures — the first to cover a time period coinciding
with the coronavirus pandemic — points to significant moves to facilitate imports,
including products related to COVID-19. During the mid-October 2019 to mid-May 2020
review period, G20 economies implemented 154 new trade and trade-related measures,
95 of them import-facilitating and 59 import-restrictive. Of these measures, 93
(about 60 per cent) were linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.
New import-restrictive
measures unrelated to the pandemic covered an estimated USD 417.5 billion worth
of merchandise trade, the third-highest figure recorded since May 2012. Tariff increases,
import bans, stricter customs procedures, export duties and other such measures
introduced during the review period affected 2.8 per cent of G20 trade. Meanwhile,
the stock of import-restrictive measures implemented since 2009 and still in force
continues to grow – now affecting an estimated 10.3 per cent of G20 imports (USD
1.6 trillion).
However,
the WTO report also finds evidence of steps towards more open trade policies across
sectors, including goods, services and intellectual property.
New import-facilitating
measures, such as tariff reductions, the elimination of import taxes and the reduction
of export duties, covered an estimated USD 735.9 billion worth of trade, excluding
policies relating to the pandemic. This figure is the highest recorded since 2014,
and is sharply higher than the USD 92.6 billion trade coverage of import-facilitating
measures recorded during the previous monitoring period from May to October 2019.
The initial
COVID-19 outbreak saw many governments introduce trade restrictions, over 90 per
cent of them export bans on medical products, such as surgical masks, gloves, medicine
and disinfectant. Since then, G20 economies have repealed 36 per cent of these restrictions.
They have also lowered barriers to imports of many pandemic-related products. As
of mid-May 2020, 65 of the 93 pandemic-related trade measures implemented during
the monitoring period – or about 70 per cent - were of a trade-facilitating nature.
The remaining 28 measures, 30 per cent of the total, could be considered to have
trade-restrictive effects.
Commenting
on the report, Director-General Roberto Azevędo said:
"Historically
high levels of trade-restrictive measures remain a source of concern, all the more
so at a time when international trade and investment will be critical to rebuild
economies, businesses and livelihoods around the world. That said, we also see some
encouraging indications: not since 2014 have import-facilitating measures implemented
during a single monitoring period covered more trade.
"There
are signs that trade-restrictive measures adopted in the early stages of the pandemic
are starting to be rolled back. There is no room for complacency: building on these
positive indicators will demand consistent efforts and leadership, starting with
the G20. Exceptional circumstances require exceptional responses, and this is the
time for G20 governments to work together to facilitate a rapid and inclusive economic
recovery."
The report
– the 23rd in a series dating back to the global financial crisis in 2009 – was
the first to be prepared against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. The full
impact of the viral outbreak and associated lockdown measures is not yet reflected
in trade statistics, but according to WTO data published
on 22 June, world trade fell sharply in the first half of the year.
In addition
to details about trade measures put in place during the review period, the report,
in line with its mandate, provides details on general economic support measures
put in place by governments. The new report also describes the unprecedented number
and extent of emergency support measures introduced in response to the economic
and social disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most
of the 468 COVID-19-related economic support measures identified appeared to be
of a temporary nature and included a broad range of support programmes,
loans, credit guarantees and stimulus packages. Several measures were one-off grants,
others included disbursements staggered over a period of a few months to up to three
years. Some of these measures form part of emergency rescue programmes
collectively worth in excess of several trillion US dollars.
The WTO
trade monitoring reports have been prepared by the WTO Secretariat since 2009. G20
members are: Argentina; Australia; Brazil; Canada; China; the European Union; France;
Germany; India; Indonesia; Italy; Japan; the Republic of Korea; Mexico; the Russian
Federation; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; South Africa; Turkey; the United Kingdom;
and the United States.
·
This Report covers new trade and trade-related
measures implemented by G20 economies between 16 October 2019 and 15 May 2020. This
period included the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has already delivered
an almost unprecedented shock to the global economy and caused significant social
disruption. Although the full impact of the pandemic is not yet reflected fully
in trade statistics, it is expected to be very substantial.
·
In its trade forecast of 8 April, the WTO considered
two scenarios for the crisis, one relatively optimistic and the other more pessimistic.
Under the optimistic scenario, the volume of world merchandise trade would fall
by 12.9 per cent and world GDP would decline by 2.5 per cent. Under the pessimistic
scenario, trade would contract by 31.9 per cent and GDP would shrink by 8.8 per
cent. As of mid-June, preliminary trade data and trade-related indicators for the
first half of 2020 are more consistent with the optimistic scenario than the pessimistic
one but actual outcomes could easily fall within or even outside of the forecast
range, depending on how the crisis unfolds.
·
World trade was already slowing before the pandemic
struck, weighed down by heightened trade tensions and slowing global economic growth.
Merchandise trade was down 0.1 per cent in volume terms in 2019, marking the first
decline since 2009. Trade growth also slowed in nominal terms in 2019, as the dollar
value of merchandise exports fell by 3 per cent to USD 18.89 trillion. Although
commercial services exports increased by 2 per cent to USD 6.03 trillion in 2019,
the pace of growth was down sharply from 9 per cent in the previous year.
·
Overall, G20 economies implemented 154 new trade
and trade-related measures during the review period, of which 95 were of a trade-facilitating
nature and 59 were trade-restrictive. Sixty per cent of these measures (93 in total)
were linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Of these 93 measures, 65 facilitated trade
while 28 restricted trade. In the early stages of the pandemic, several of the measures
introduced by G20 economies restricted the free flow of trade, principally for exports.
But as of mid-May 2020, 70 per cent of all COVID-19 related measures were trade-facilitating.
Of the pandemic-related trade restrictions recorded, export bans accounted for more
than 90 per cent. Around 36 per cent of the COVID-19 specific trade restrictions
implemented by G20 economies had been repealed by mid-May.
·
Excluding COVID-19-related measures, G20 economies
implemented 61 trade and trade-related measures during the review period. These
included 30 new measures aimed at facilitating trade during the review period. The
trade coverage of these non-COVID-19 related import-facilitating measures implemented
during the review period was estimated at USD 735.9 billion, the highest figure
for such measures since November 2014. G20 economies also put in place 31 new trade-restrictive
measures unrelated to the pandemic. The trade coverage for these new import-restrictive
measures was estimated at USD 417.5 billion - the third-highest value recorded since
May 2012. The trade coverage of import restrictive measures has soared since May
2018 as a result of global trade tensions. It is estimated that 2.8 per cent of
G20 trade was affected by import-restrictive measures implemented during the current
review period. Import-restrictive measures implemented since 2009 and still in force
affect an estimated 10.3 per cent of G20 imports (USD 1.6 trillion).
·
All WTO issues regularly covered by this Report
saw significant activity both before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the review period, 203 trade remedy actions were recorded for G20 economies.
The monthly average of trade remedy actions initiated was slightly higher than the
average for the last eight years while the monthly average of trade remedy terminations
was the lowest over the same time span. During the review period, initiations of
anti-dumping investigations accounted for around 80 per cent of all trade remedy
initiations, which also includes safeguards and countervailing actions.
·
In services, most of the new measures introduced
by G20 economies between mid-October 2019 and mid-May 2020 were trade facilitating,
but a number of new policies appeared to be trade restrictive, including in areas
related to foreign investment and in areas considered strategic or linked to national
security. Most of the 51 services measures adopted by G20 economies in response
to the pandemic appeared to be trade-facilitating.
·
G20 economies continued to implement general economic
support measures as part of their overall trade policy, a fact confirmed by Secretariat
analysis despite governments' low response rate with respect to these measures.
In addition, G20 economies also implemented a large number of emergency support
measures in response to the economic and social turmoil caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most of the 468 COVID-19 related general economic support measures identified, including
monetary, fiscal and financial measures as well as preferential loans, credit guarantees,
and stimulus packages, collectively worth several trillion US dollars, appeared
to be temporary in nature. These emergency support measures are central to governments’
strategies to address the pandemic-induced economic downturn and to prepare the
ground for a strong recovery. Regular monitoring of support measures introduced
in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic will be important for members to be able
to track their evolution and effects as the world exits the health crisis and enters
a recovery period.
·
G20 economies continued to be very active in notifying
their sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, accounting
for 66 per cent of all regular notifications and 35 per cent of emergency notifications
since 1995. From 1 February until 15 May 2020, ten G20 economies submitted 15 SPS
notifications and communications related to measures taken in response to the pandemic.
The nature of most of these measures has shifted, from initial restrictions on animal
imports and/or transit from affected areas and additional certification requirements,
to, as of April, trade-facilitating measures such as the use of electronic certificates
for checks. Similarly, G20 economies are the most frequent users of the Technical
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee's transparency mechanisms. As of 15 May 2020,
G20 economies had submitted 20 COVID-19 related TBT notifications, covering a wide
range of products including personal protective equipment (PPE), medical equipment,
medical supplies, medicines and food.
·
Most questions raised in the Committee on Agriculture
during the review period focused on policies implemented by G20 economies. In relation
to the COVID-19 pandemic, three WTO members informed the WTO of temporary measures
to respond to food security threats.
·
The Report also covers developments in G20 economies
in trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS). Several G20 members
implemented specific IP-related measures aimed at facilitating the development and
dissemination of COVID-19 related health technologies, as well as at relaxing procedural
requirements and extending deadlines for administrative IP matters.
·
Work continued in the first months of 2020 to
advance negotiations, particularly on fisheries subsidies, building on the decision
taken by members at the WTO’s 11th Ministerial Conference in late 2017. Groups of
members also continued to pursue discussions on other issues, including electronic
commerce, investment facilitation, women's economic empowerment, domestic regulation
in services and micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). However, delegations'
ability to engage in detailed negotiations has been constrained by restrictions
on movement and the refocusing of priorities on addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.
Note:
Including COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.
Note:
COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures are not included.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.
Note:
COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures are not included.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.
Note:
These figures are estimates and represent the trade coverage of the measures (i.e.
annual imports of the products concerned from economies affected by the measures)
and not the cumulative impact of the trade measures. Liberalization associated with
the 2015 Expansion of the WTO's Information Technology Agreement is not included
in the figures. COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures are not included.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.
Note:
These figures are estimates and represent the trade coverage of the measures (i.e.
annual imports of the products concerned from economies affected by the measures)
introduced during each reporting period, and not the cumulative impact of the trade
measures. COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures are not included.
Source: WTO Secretariat.
Note:
The cumulative trade coverage estimated by the Secretariat is based on information
available in the Trade Monitoring Database (TMDB) on import measures recorded since
2009 and considered to have a trade-restrictive effect. The estimates include import
measures for which HS codes were available. The figures do not include trade remedy
measures. COVID-19 trade and trade-related measures are not included. The import
values were sourced from the UNSD Comtrade database.
Source:
WTO Secretariat.