Apple Turns
to Alibaba China for AI
The Trump administration
and congressional officials have raised concerns about a deal to put a Chinese company’s
artificial intelligence on iPhones.
·
The
U.S. government succeeded in pressuring Apple to abandon a deal to buy memory chips
from a Chinese supplier, the Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation, or YMTC.
·
Defense
Department and intelligence officials have also been scrutinizing Alibaba’s ties
to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army.
·
“We’re
not interested in you building in India,” Mr. Trump said he had told Mr. Cook. “India
can take care of themselves. They’re doing very well. We want you to build here.”
·
Apple
struck a partnership with OpenAI to support some of its A.I. abilities. OpenAI’s
chatbot, ChatGPT, is currently answering questions when prompted on iPhones in the
United States.
·
Because
OpenAI doesn’t operate in Beijing, Apple needed to find a local partner to give
iPhones in China the same performance as those in the United States. The company
spoke with several Chinese tech companies before striking a deal with Alibaba. This
year, it asked Chinese regulators to approve the A.I. features.
[ABS News Service/19.05.2025]
Apple believes the future success of the iPhone depends on the
availability of new artificial intelligence features. But tensions between Washington
and Beijing may cripple the tech giant’s plans to deliver A.I. in its second-most-important
market, China.
In recent months, the White House and congressional officials
have been scrutinizing Apple’s plan to strike a deal with Alibaba to make the Chinese
company’s A.I. available on iPhones in China, three people familiar with the deliberations
said. They are concerned that the deal would help a Chinese company improve its
artificial intelligence abilities, broaden the reach of Chinese chatbots with censorship
limits and deepen Apple’s exposure to Beijing laws over censorship and data sharing.
The scrutiny is the latest example of the challenges that Apple
has run into as it tries to sustain its businesses in the United States and China
at a time of rising geopolitical tensions. Three years ago, the U.S. government
succeeded in pressuring Apple to abandon a deal to buy memory chips from a Chinese
supplier, the Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation, or YMTC. More recently, the
company has been challenged by U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made products like the iPhone,
threatening to cut into the company’s profits.
Walking away from an Alibaba deal would have far graver consequences
for Apple’s business in China, which accounts for almost a fifth of the company’s
sales. The partnership with the Chinese tech company is critical to bringing A.I.
features to iPhones in one of the world’s most highly regulated and competitive
markets. Without the Alibaba partnership, iPhones could fall behind smartphones
from Chinese rivals like Huawei and Xiaomi.
Officials at the White House and the House Select Committee
on China have raised the deal directly with Apple executives, said the three people,
who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak
to the media. During meetings in Washington with senior Apple executives and lobbyists,
government officials asked about terms of the deal, what data Apple would be sharing
with Alibaba and whether it would be signing any legal commitments with Chinese
regulators. In the meeting with the House committee in March, Apple executives were
unable to answer most of those questions, two of these people said.
Washington’s concern about the deal has been heightened by a
deepening conviction that A.I. will become a critical military tool. The technology,
which can write emails and develop software code, has the potential to coordinate
military attacks and control autonomous drones. Worried about a future U.S.-Chinese
conflict, Washington officials have tried to limit Beijing’s access to A.I. technology,
cutting off its ability to make and buy A.I. chips.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the ranking
Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement
that it “is extremely disturbing that Apple has not been transparent about its agreement.”
“Alibaba is a poster child for the Chinese Communist Party’s
military-civil fusion strategy, and why Apple would choose to work with them on
A.I. is anyone’s guess,” he said. “There are serious concerns that this partnership
will help Alibaba collect data to refine its models, all while allowing Apple to
turn a blind eye to the fundamental rights of its Chinese iPhone users.”
Apple, the White House and Alibaba did not provide comment.
Apple hasn’t publicly acknowledged the A.I. deal in China, but Alibaba’s chairman,
Joe Tsai, confirmed it publicly in February.
There is concern in Washington that an Apple deal with Alibaba
would set a problematic precedent. U.S. companies could help Chinese A.I. providers
reach more users and use the data they collect from those users to improve their
models. The risk would be that Baidu, Alibaba, ByteDance and other Chinese companies
could then use those improvements to help China’s military.
To limit U.S.-Chinese collaboration, the Trump administration
has discussed whether Alibaba and other Chinese A.I. companies should be put on
a list prohibiting them from doing business with U.S. companies, the people familiar
with the deliberations said. Defense Department and intelligence officials have also been scrutinizing
Alibaba’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army.
Greg Allen, the director of the Wadhwani A.I. Center at the Center for Strategic
and International Studies, a think tank, said Apple’s partnership ran counter to
the bipartisan efforts in Washington to slow China’s A.I. development. Apple could
be motivated to help Alibaba improve its artificial intelligence system because
its A.I. could make iPhones in China more useful, valuable and easier to sell.
“The United States is in an A.I. race with China, and we just
don’t want American companies helping Chinese companies run faster,” Mr. Allen said.
In addition to this scrutiny, Apple’s chief executive, Tim Cook,
has faced new criticism from President Trump. During Mr. Trump’s trip across the
Middle East this past week, he said he had “a little problem” with Mr. Cook because
Apple was beginning to build products in India rather than the United States.
Last year, Apple revamped the iPhone with new A.I. abilities
that it called Apple Intelligence. It said iPhone users would be able to use its
A.I. product to summarize notifications and gain access to writing tools that could
improve emails and other messages. It also revealed an improved Siri virtual assistant
that could combine information on a phone, like a message about someone’s travel
itinerary, with information from the web, like a flight arrival time.
(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft,
accusing them of copyright infringement regarding news content related to A.I. systems.
OpenAI and Microsoft have denied those claims.)
Congressional officials were alarmed that Apple had requested
approval from Chinese regulators for the Alibaba partnership, two people familiar
with their concerns said. Because A.I. is an emerging field, the committee worried
that Apple might make concessions or sign an agreement that would make it subject
to Chinese laws.
Apple hasn’t provided an update on when the A.I. features will
become available on its iPhones in China. During calls with analysts this year,
Mr. Cook said sales of iPhones had been better in markets where Apple Intelligence
was available.
If the deal with Alibaba collapses, there is also a potential
knock-on effect because Alibaba is a major e-commerce retailer that could sell and
market iPhones, said Richard Kramer, a senior analyst at Arete Research, an investment
advisory firm. He said that kind of partnership had the potential to boost the iPhone
after Apple’s share of smartphone sales in China fell to 15 percent last year from
19 percent in 2023.
Without Alibaba, Chinese iPhone users could download A.I. apps,
Mr. Kramer said. It would make for a more difficult experience than rivals might
offer.
“People will still buy their phones, but it will make it harder,”
he said.