BRICS Meet Calls for WTO Reform to Break
Stalemate, WTO DG Comes to Delhi for Meet
[ABS News
Service/14.09.2026]
Geneva – The two-day leaders’ meeting of the 21-member
BRICS coalition of developing countries that concluded in New Delhi on Sunday
raised sharp concerns about “indiscriminate tariffs” and “unilateral tariff and
non-tariff measures”, said people familiar with the New Delhi Declaration.
The BRICS leaders supported reform of the World Trade
Organization by “upholding the foundational principles, such as
Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and Special and Differential Treatment for
developing members, particularly LDCs.”
Issuing the 140-paragraph “BRICS New Delhi Declaration:
Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability,” the
enlarged BRICS membership addressed global trade, climate change, supply chains
and the fragile security situation in the Middle East.
Leaders of the coalition – Brazil, Russia, India, China,
South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, United Arab
Emirates, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand,
Uganda, Uzbekistan and Vietnam – raised concerns over sustained attempts to
undermine the multilateral trading system through unilateral tariff and trade
measures adopted by the United States and other industrialized countries.
WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala attended the
meeting.
Preserving the Trading System
Under “Preserving and Revitalizing the Multilateral Trading
System,” the Declaration addresses trade measures, including the unprecedented
rise of unilateral tariffs, WTO reforms that seek to undermine foundational
issues and immediate restoration of the Appellate Body.
The leaders reaffirmed their “unwavering support for reform
of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and to strengthening a
non-discriminatory, open, equitable, transparent, fair, inclusive, predictable
and rules-based multilateral trading system, with the WTO at its core.”
The Declaration explicitly upholds “the foundational
principles, such as Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and Special and Differential
Treatment for developing members, particularly LDCs.”
In ongoing WTO reform discussions, the United States,
European Union and other industrialized countries have sought to substantially
change MFN and S&DT.
While committing to engage “in multilateral negotiations in
Geneva, especially in the debates regarding the reform of the WTO,” the
Declaration says BRICS members “will advance efforts and enhance coordination
under the BRICS Informal Consultative Framework on the challenges undermining
the effectiveness and credibility of the WTO and solutions to these
challenges.”
Even though trade ministers failed to reach consensus at
the WTO’s 14th ministerial conference earlier this year, the Delhi Declaration
says that BRICS members “will ensure the implementation of the MC14 outcomes
and continue to engage constructively towards the resolution of outstanding
issues.”
It vows to “engage constructively in the WTO reform to
enhance the WTO’s authority, effectiveness, inclusiveness, and relevance, and
build an open world economy.”
On incorporating plurilaterals
into the WTO, the New Delhi Declaration says it “recognize (s) that it is
important to identify appropriate pathways for plurilateral initiatives into
the WTO legal framework including on development-oriented issues, and to
explore the formulation of forward-looking rules in the WTO.”
With reform of the Dispute Settlement System reportedly
scuttled by major industrialized countries, the Declaration advocates “for the
immediate restoration of an accessible, effective, fully functioning, two-tier
binding WTO dispute settlement mechanism as a foundation for trust and
predictability for all WTO members.” It calls for immediate “appointment of new
Appellate Body members without further delay.”
Necessary Reform
BRICS members said they “look forward to working towards
strengthening the organization through the necessary reform while upholding the
foundational principles of the WTO and facilitating the negotiation process
within the WTO framework, and to restoring the credibility of the multilateral
trading system.”
Noting that “the multilateral trading system has long been
at a crossroads,” the Delhi Declaration warns that “the proliferation of
trade-restrictive actions that are inconsistent with WTO rules, whether in the
form of indiscriminate rising of tariffs and non-tariff measures, or
protectionism under the guise of environmental objectives, threatens to further
reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty
into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating
existing economic disparities and negatively affecting prospects for global
economic development.”
Without naming the United States, the Declaration voiced
“serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures
which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO rules.” BRICS leaders said
they “will work together to enhance the WTO’s responsiveness to trade
disruptions and the needs and priorities of emerging markets and developing
economies (EMDEs), as well as advance discussions on outstanding issues, and
support balanced, inclusive and concrete outcomes that strengthen the
multilateral trading system and enable it to better address evolving global
challenges.”
On sanctions, the Delhi Declaration states: “we condemn the
imposition of unilateral coercive measures that are contrary to international
law, and reiterate that such measures, inter alia in the form of unilateral
economic sanctions and secondary sanctions, have far-reaching negative
implications for the human rights, including the rights to development, health
and food security, of the general population of targeted states,
disproportionally affecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations,
deepening the digital divide and exacerbating environmental challenges.” The
Declaration calls “for the elimination of such unlawful measures, which
undermine international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter.”
It states unequivocally BRICS members’ “opposition to unilateral coercive
measures that are contrary to international law and the Charter of the United
Nations, including non-UN Security Council authorized sanctions.”