Despite threats from President Trump, the
overall average weighted tariff on Chinese goods remained about the same, and is
now lower than countries like Brazil and Canada.
·
China
issued a formal protest against the latest U.S. tariffs but did
not impose retaliatory tariffs,
marking a departure from previous rounds of the U.S.-China trade war.
·
The
Trump administration imposed a 12.5%
tariff on Chinese goods under the latest Section
301 action.
·
This
is significantly lower than the 145%
tariff threatened during the "Liberation
Day" tariff announcements in April 2025.
·
Including
tariffs imposed during Trump's first presidency and subsequent measures, the average
weighted U.S. tariff on Chinese imports is now 23.1%.
·
This
effective tariff rate is lower than the rates currently applied to
imports from Brazil and Canada.
·
Chinese
officials believe U.S. tariffs are unlikely to rise substantially further.
·
Their
confidence stems from a trade understanding reached during negotiations with
U.S. officials and reinforced by a handshake agreement between President
Trump and President Xi Jinping in
October.
·
Analysts
at Guojin
Securities stated that the latest tariff increase
would have only a limited impact on China's economy.
·
The
overall effective tariff rate rose only marginally from 21.9%
to 23.1%.
·
The
latest tariffs are part of the Trump administration's wider Section
301 initiative targeting more than 80
trading partners.
·
The
administration alleges these countries have failed to adequately address forced
labour practices.
·
Additional
Section 301 tariffs are expected following investigations into alleged unfair
manufacturing practices, including excess
industrial capacity.
·
China
remains one of the countries under review.
·
The
administration is not expected to reintroduce tariffs approaching the levels
announced under the April 2025 "Liberation Day" measures.
·
Those
earlier tariffs were subsequently struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.
·
Chinese
state media described the latest measures as "America's
never-ending tariffs."
·
It
accused Washington of creating new justifications to continue imposing tariffs.
·
China's
Foreign Ministry reiterated its opposition to unilateral
tariffs.
·
However,
officials declined to announce any retaliatory measures.
·
Trade
analysts believe both governments have an informal understanding that additional
tariffs on China will not exceed roughly 20%
beyond current levels.
·
Such a
ceiling is intended to preserve the existing trade truce.
·
Experts
warn that any additional tariff increase beyond approximately 7.5
percentage points could jeopardize the current agreement
and provoke Chinese countermeasures.
·
The
tariff understanding reportedly emerged during trade negotiations held in Kuala
Lumpur.
·
President
Trump and President Xi later reaffirmed the arrangement during a meeting in
South Korea.
·
President
Trump stated that tariffs were not
discussed during his May meeting with President Xi
in Beijing.
·
China's
Commerce Ministry disputed this, stating that both sides held extensive
discussions on tariffs and that Washington
should honor its commitments.
·
China
has strengthened its negotiating leverage by tightening controls over rare
earth exports.
·
Rare
earth materials are essential for:
o Electric vehicles
o Advanced electronics
o Defence equipment
o Aerospace manufacturing
·
Chinese
trade experts expect no major across-the-board tariff
increases during the remainder of President Trump's
current term.
·
Beijing
believes both sides now have incentives to maintain tariff stability.
China
has responded cautiously to President Trump's latest tariff measures because
the new duties are far lower than previously threatened
levels and remain within what Beijing considers
an informal tariff ceiling
negotiated with Washington. Confident in its leverage—particularly through
control of rare earth supply chains—and expecting limited further escalation,
China has chosen restraint over retaliation while seeking to preserve the
current trade truce.
[ABS News Service/25.07.2026]
China’s
response to President Trump’s new round of tariffs was muted. Beijing issued a statement
in protest, but unlike in past rounds of tit-for-tat, it did not lob a counter.
China
has cause to be low key. It has so far emerged from the trade war with the United
States in a better position. One year ago President Trump
threatened tariffs on Chinese goods as high as 145 percent. The levies that Mr.
Trump imposed on Chinese goods on Friday were just 12.5 percent.
Factoring
in earlier tariffs, including those from Mr. Trump’s first presidency, the overall
average weighted tariff on Chinese goods is now 23.1 percent — lower than Brazil
or Canada.
Chinese
officials are also confident that tariffs will not rise much further, after securing
an assurance of a truce from U.S. trade negotiators. That agreement, which trade
experts have placed at about a 20 percent cap, was later sealed with a handshake
between China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, and Mr. Trump last October.
The
new tariffs will “have a limited impact on China at present,” according to analysts
at Guojin Securities, a financial firm in Chengdu, China,
who calculated the new overall tariff rate. The rate was previously 21.9 percent.
The
tariffs imposed on China are part of Mr. Trump’s broader effort to transform global
trade. On Friday, the administration issued tariffs on more than 80 trading partners
over claims of failing to pass or enforce laws banning forced labor. The new tariffs, which were between 10 percent and 12.5
percent, replaced a global 10 percent tariff as it expired.
The
White House issued the duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which
allows the president to impose tariffs on foreign countries that engage in unreasonable
or discriminatory trade practices. More tariffs are expected in the coming weeks,
after an administration proposal to offset what the White House calls unfair practices
in several countries’ manufacturing sectors — including China.
None
of those tariffs are expected to top those announced by Mr. Trump under an international
emergency law on April 2, 2025, which he termed “Liberation Day.” The Supreme Court
struck down Mr. Trump’s use of the law to impose tariffs in February.
On
Friday, Chinese state media called the Trump administration’s policy “America’s
never-ending tariffs,” and added that Washington “has found a new pretext for abusing
tariffs.”
The
foreign ministry showed more restraint. At a regular news conference on Friday,
a spokesman said China opposed “all forms of unilateral tariffs,” but he did not
respond when asked whether the country would retaliate.
China
may take comfort in a perceived promise by Mr. Trump to cap tariffs, trade experts
said.
“My
understanding is that there is a ‘wink, wink, nod, nod’ on 20 percent additional
tariffs and through these 301 investigations, any findings on China would conveniently
not exceed that,” said Wendy Cutler, a senior vice president at the Asia Society
Policy Institute.
Anything
more than a 7.5 percent tariff on China in the next round would risk the fragile
truce and invite retaliation, she added. Mr. Trump said Mr. Xi will visit Washington
in September.
Trade
negotiators set that ceiling last year during U.S.-Chinese trade talks in Kuala
Lumpur, the Malaysian capital. Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi shook on the terms of a trade
deal in South Korea several days later, agreeing to a tariff truce for one year.
During
meetings with Mr. Xi in Beijing in May, Mr. Trump said the two did not discuss tariffs.
But
China’s commerce ministry pushed back on his comments, saying in a statement that
the United States and China had “engaged in in-depth discussions on tariffs.” The
ministry added that it hoped Washington would “honor its
commitments” and ensure that the U.S. tariff levels on Chinese goods would “not
exceed the level stipulated” during talks in October.
Trade
experts said Beijing was drawing a line on tariff rates after a year of standing
up to Washington, matching each of Mr. Trump’s ever-higher tariffs with its own
and tightening control over rare-earths exports. China dominates the global supply
chains for rare earths, materials that are critical to everything from fighter jets
to motors in car seats.
“My
personal understanding is that during the remainder of Trump’s term, there probably
won’t be sharp, comprehensive tariff increases again,” said Tu Xinquan, dean of the China WTO Institute at the University of
International Business and Economics in Beijing.