China Retaliates Against Latest US Sanctions with Drone Export Curbs and Counter-Sanctions

Beijing frames the measures as a ‘restrained’ response to the US’ recent sanctions and robot import ban, but warns of potential further actions

·         China Announces Countermeasures: China has responded to the latest US sanctions by imposing counter-sanctions on seven US entities, tightening export controls on drones and related technologies, and launching a national security investigation into imported office equipment.

·         Drone Export Restrictions: China will subject exports of drones, key drone components and related technologies destined for the US to strict case-by-case approval with immediate effect, citing national security and non-proliferation commitments.

·         Sanctions on US Entities: China added six US entities to its countermeasures list for allegedly assisting US sanctions related to Xinjiang, prohibiting Chinese individuals and companies from cooperating with them.

·         Action Against Compliance Testing LLC: A seventh US company, Compliance Testing LLC, was also sanctioned for allegedly assisting the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in measures that China claims undermine its sovereignty, security and development interests.

·         National Security Investigation: China has launched its first investigation under the revised Foreign Trade Law's national security provisions, examining imported printing and copying office equipment using foreign-developed software.

·         Focus on US Technology Firms: The probe is expected to affect major suppliers of printing software, including Microsoft and HP, and will assess whether foreign government policies pose risks to China's national security.

·         Response to Recent US Measures: Beijing's actions follow Washington's decision to:

o    Add 43 Chinese companies to the Uygur Forced Labour Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List.

o    Expand restrictions covering sectors such as cotton, food, pharmaceuticals, metals and lithium.

o    Ban imports and sales of certain foreign-made robotic devices and power inverters, industries where China has a significant global presence.

·         China Rejects Forced Labour Allegations: Beijing reiterated its denial of allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang, describing the US measures as unjustified.

·         Calibrated Retaliation: China's Commerce Ministry described its response as restrained, stating that it values stable China-US economic relations while demanding that Washington withdraw its latest restrictions.

·         Warning of Further Action: China warned that it would adopt additional countermeasures if the US continues to impose new restrictions.

·         Strategic Shift in Trade Conflict: Analysts view the measures as a calibrated escalation, signalling that competition is increasingly centred on technology, supply chains and export controls rather than tariffs.

·         Drone Industry Becomes New Pressure Point: The drone restrictions extend China's earlier strategy of leveraging dominance in rare earth minerals to other strategic sectors where it enjoys significant global market share.

·         Growing Importance of Export Controls: Analysts noted that export controls have evolved into a regular instrument of strategic competition, with both countries seeking leverage over critical technologies, dual-use goods and supply chains.

·         Diplomatic Context: China's response comes shortly after a video call between Vice-Premier He Lifeng, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, during which Beijing expressed concerns over US trade actions.

·         Upcoming High-Level Engagement: Despite the latest measures, analysts believe both countries are seeking to avoid uncontrolled escalation ahead of President Xi Jinping's expected visit to Washington in September 2026, although further unilateral actions could disrupt diplomatic engagement.

·         Overall Assessment: The latest developments underscore the continuing transformation of the US-China trade dispute into a broader strategic competition, with export controls, technology access and supply-chain resilience becoming the primary tools of economic statecraft.

 

[ABS News Service/05.08.2026]

China has hit back against a round of US sanctions with a barrage of counter-sanctions targeting a group of American entities and a tightening of export restrictions on the drone supply chain, the Ministry of Commerce announced on Wednesday.

The export controls will subject any shipments of “drones, their key components and related technologies” to the US to “strict case-by-case scrutiny”, with the measures set to take effect immediately, the ministry said in a statement, citing the need to “safeguard national security and meet China’s international commitments on non-proliferation”.

On the same day, the commerce ministry also added six US entities to its countermeasures list – banning Chinese entities and individuals from cooperating with them – over allegations that they had assisted US sanctions related to China’s western Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, describing their conduct as “egregious”.

A seventh US company, Compliance Testing LLC, was added to the countermeasures list for assisting the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in introducing measures that “endanger China’s sovereignty, security and development interests”.

Separately, the commerce ministry launched a national security investigation regarding imported printing and copying office equipment with foreign-made software. US tech firms – such as Microsoft and HP – are seen as major players in the printing software sector.

The inquiry is the first to be launched using the new national security provisions laid out in China’s revised foreign trade law, according to the commerce ministry, adding the investigation would cover the effect of foreign government policies on China’s security interests.

The measures are a response to a string of recent actions by US authorities.

Last week, Washington added 43 Chinese companies to its own entity list under the Uygur Forced Labour Prevention Act, covering sectors ranging from food and cotton to pharmaceuticals, metals and lithium production. Beijing has repeatedly denied allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang.

Meanwhile, the FCC banned the import and sale of new foreign-made robotic devices and power inverters, two sectors where China is a leading global player.

“China’s countermeasures have been restrained overall. China values the hard-won stability of China-US economic and trade relations. We hope the US side can work with China in the same direction,” the commerce ministry said in a statement.

But the ministry demanded that Washington immediately rescind its measures, warning that China would retaliate further if the US pressed ahead with new restrictions.

Analysts said Beijing’s response marked the latest “calibrated escalation” in an ongoing US-China trade and technology dispute, which has seen both sides attempt to gain strategic leverage by threatening to cut off access to key resources and technologies.

For some, the drone industry restrictions build on the tactics Beijing used during its trade war with Washington last year, when it tightened export controls over rare earth minerals – a vital industry where it controls most global supplies.

“Beijing is extending the rare-earths playbook up the value chain, from raw inputs like gallium and germanium to finished-goods components in a sector it dominates,” said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East at French investment bank Natixis.

Drones were already a point of friction in US-China relations. Chinese companies are the undisputed leaders in the industry, dominating the global supply chain. In December, the FCC banned the import of all new models of foreign-made drones and related components, citing national security risks.

Beijing appears to have taken particular issue with the timing of Washington’s latest actions. The US sanctions were announced on July 31, a day after Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng held a video call with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

During the call, China expressed serious concern over the US’ recent economic and trade moves, Xinhua reported. But Washington had pressed ahead with its measures “in complete disregard” of China’s repeated representations, the commerce ministry said in another statement on Wednesday.

The decision “seriously contravenes” the consensus reached by Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump during their recent meetings and seriously harms China’s “legitimate rights and interests”, according to the statement.

For Garcia-Herrero, Beijing was trying to signal it was “keeping its powder dry” as both sides race to “de-risk” their economies – plugging holes in their supply chains before the other side can weaponise the vulnerability.

Xu Tianchen, senior economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said Beijing’s move was a reciprocal response rather than an escalation, pointing to Xi’s expected visit to Washington in September.

Xi and Trump last met during the US president’s visit to Beijing in May. At the time, Trump said Xi would visit America “on September 24, or thereabouts”, with subsequent meetings likely to take place on the sidelines of major international summits in November and December.

“Xi’s visit is an important event. Following China’s countermeasures and continued communication between the two sides, tensions are expected to ease,” Xu said, though he added that the possibility of engagement being derailed by further unilateral US actions could not be ruled out.

Matteo Giovannini, a senior finance manager at the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, said the key signal was that “export controls are no longer exceptional policy tools, as they have become a normal feature of strategic competition”.

“The contest is shifting from tariffs towards control over critical technologies, supply chains, and dual-use goods, where both Washington and Beijing believe they possess meaningful leverage.”