China Solar
Panels may Face Retrospective Duties to Punish Import Surge
The
US division of German photovoltaic manufacturer SolarWorld
has announced that Washington will indeed impose retroactive duties on
Chinese-made solar panels, should the US Commerce Department ultimately decide
that such fees are warranted. The company had strongly argued in favour of
retroactive duties, claiming that the announced expiration of a US subsidy
programme triggered a surge in solar panel imports from China before access to
the programme was cut off on 31 December.
SolarWorld’s
30 January announcement, made jointly with the six other companies in the
Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing (CASM) explained that, should the US
agency decide to impose preliminary countervailing duties next month, these
duties would apply retroactively on panels imported into the US from 3 December
2011 onwards.
The
company said that the Commerce Department had found evidence of “massive
imports” of Chinese solar panels in late 2011, and that “critical
circumstances” might exist that would impact the agency’s upcoming decision.
Import
surge
The
import surge is why the solar manufacturer had sought the “critical
circumstances” finding, which would allow for the duties to be imposed 90 days
retroactively, Brightbill told Bloomberg.
The
Treasury Department’s now-expired 1603 programme offered cash subsidies of up
to thirty percent for renewable energy projects if
they commenced construction on projects by 31 December 2011, and could complete
construction by 31 December 2016.
SolarWorld
has been a vocal critic of China’s solar industry, arguing that Beijing’s
subsidies and preferential policies unfairly benefit Chinese manufacturers.
These concerns led to a complaint being filed by SolarWorld
at the US International Trade Commission in 2011. This complaint was upheld on
2 December 2011, resulting in continuing further investigation.
SolarWorld
had originally asked that duties be imposed on any solar import from a Chinese
company received after 15 November 2011. The complaint cites a remarkable 76 percent spike in imports from Chinese solar giant Suntech Power - the world’s largest photovoltaic panel
manufacturer - between October 2011 and November 2011. Similarly, major Chinese
manufacturer Trina Solar reportedly saw exports to the US triple in the first
half of December 2011, when compared with the first half of November.
The
US Commerce Department is expected to make a preliminary decision on 2 March on
whether to impose countervailing duties, postponing a decision that had
originally been expected in mid-February. A preliminary decision on the dumping
part of the complaint is expected in late March.