Digital Trade Agreements Expand Rapidly as Global Rules Shift Towards Regional Frameworks

·         The Hinrich Foundation and Digital Policy Alert released the report "Why Digital is Different: Making Digital Trade Policy for the 21st Century", providing the first comprehensive inventory of digital trade commitments in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs).

·         Digital trade is becoming an increasingly important component of global trade, with governments relying on digital trade provisions in FTAs to facilitate cross-border digital commerce.

·         The report identifies 2,587 digital trade provisions across 163 trade agreements involving 163 jurisdictions, with more than half negotiated during the last four years (2022–2026).

·         The study highlights two major trends:

o    Digital trade is accounting for a growing share of global trade.

o    Digital trade governance is shifting from multilateral negotiations towards regional and plurilateral agreements.

·         The report warns that regulatory fragmentation across countries is increasing compliance costs, particularly for SMEs, and underscores the need for regulatory interoperability rather than isolated national regulations.

·         It argues that bilateral and plurilateral agreements cannot fully substitute for a multilateral framework, as their commitments apply only to participating economies.

·         Asia is the leading region in digital trade agreements. Among individual economies:

o    Singapore participates in 26 agreements,

o    UAE (21),

o    EU (20),

o    Korea (18),

o    Australia and the UK (16 each),

o    followed by Chile, China, the US, Canada, Peru and New Zealand.

·         Digital trade commitments have expanded from 10 topics in 2001 to 26 distinct topics, grouped into six thematic clusters:

o    Technology,

o    Data,

o    Trust,

o    Market Access,

o    Digital Business, and

o    Digital Government.

·         The report identifies three phases in the evolution of digital trade rules:

o    2001–2010: Narrow, largely non-binding commitments.

o    2011–2017: Greater geographic spread with stronger binding obligations.

o    Since 2018: Rapid expansion through regional digital economy agreements with broader and more binding commitments.

·         Major agreements driving recent expansion include:

o    CPTPP (2018),

o    USMCA (2018),

o    RCEP (2020),

o    Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA),

o    African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Digital Trade Protocol, and

o    the WTO Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on Electronic Commerce, whose agreement text was stabilised in 2024 but is yet to enter into force.

·         Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a new area of digital trade governance:

o    There are 12 AI provisions across 12 agreements involving 29 jurisdictions.

o    These focus primarily on international cooperation, responsible AI use, and the development of interoperable AI governance frameworks.

o    Singapore, Australia and the UAE have been the leading proponents of AI provisions in trade agreements.

·         The report notes that neither the US nor the EU has included AI commitments in trade agreements, reflecting their divergent domestic AI regulatory approaches.

·         On cross-border data flows, the report identifies 71 provisions across 66 agreements, with most modern FTAs adopting binding commitments permitting data transfers while allowing exceptions for legitimate public policy objectives.

·         Provisions restricting data localisation requirements now appear in 55 agreements covering 120 jurisdictions, generally prohibiting mandatory local computing facilities except under specified public policy exceptions.

·         The report also highlights increasing commitments on:

o    Source code protection, prohibiting mandatory disclosure of proprietary software source code except under defined regulatory or judicial exceptions; and

o    Cryptography, limiting mandatory disclosure of proprietary encryption technologies while preserving law enforcement and regulatory access in specified circumstances.

·         The report concludes that future digital trade governance will depend on enhancing regulatory interoperability, strengthening trust among governments, and pursuing broader international cooperation to reduce digital fragmentation and enable seamless cross-border digital trade.

 

Hinrich Foundation Report

[ABS News Service/10.07.2026]