Dollar on Top but
local Currencies use in Bilateral Trade Up
The world’s reserve currency
is facing a challenge from Global South countries who want options beyond the
greenback.
For
80 years, the United States dollar has dominated all other currencies. But a grouping
of developing countries tired of the West’s looming presence over global governance
and finance is determined to take it down a peg.
The
process of de-dollarisation is “irreversible” and “gaining pace”, Russian President
Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday in a virtual address to the BRICS summit in Johannesburg,
where the leaders of Brazil, India, China and South Africa are gathered for three
days.
The
dollar has been the world’s principal reserve currency since the end of World War
II, and is estimated to be used in more than 80 percent of international trade.
Earlier
this year, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
questioned why all countries had to base their trade on the dollar, and prior to
that, a top Russian official suggested that the BRICS grouping was working on creating
its own currency.
Calls
for a global shift away from dollar dominance are not new, nor are they unique to
BRICS, but experts say recent geopolitical shifts and growing tensions between the
West and Russia and China have brought them to the fore.
In
early 2022, Western sanctions over Russian’s invasion of Ukraine froze nearly half
of Russia’s foreign currency reserves and removed major Russian banks from SWIFT,
a messaging network banks use to facilitate international payments.
Later
in the year, the US imposed restrictions on exports of semiconductor technology
to China.
“As
the US weaponises the dollar in the Russian and Iran sanctions,
there is increasing desire by other developing countries to seek alternative currencies
for trade, investment, and reserves, as well as developing alternative multilateral
clearance systems outside of SWIFT,” Shirley Ze Yu, a senior visiting fellow at
the London School of Economics, told Al Jazeera.
Yu
added that as the US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates in recent years,
“developing countries have widely suffered from paying higher interests on their
dollar debt and battling the exchange rate impact from a strong dollar. The interest
to borrow in local currencies or other currencies is strongly motivated by economic
considerations”.
The
impetus for Global South countries trying to find an alternative is more a “practical
consideration” than a moral one, said Gustavo de Carvalho, a policy analyst on Russia-Africa
ties at the South African Institute of International Affairs, as they view the recent
sanctions and ask: “What are the risks that we are facing by engaging with one currency
globally that may be utilised for political purposes?”
Speaking
at a workshop on BRICS and the global order in Johannesburg last week, de Carvalho
laid out some “very loose” options BRICS may consider, including using a basket
of currencies from BRICS countries, using gold as a peg for a new potential currency,
or even using cryptocurrencies.
“Each
of them are quite separate and probably much more mid-to-long
term than they are short term,” he said.
A
BRICS currency?
Considering
the possible currency options, Danny Bradlow, a professor with the Centre for Advancement
of Scholarship at the University of Pretoria, said he doubts many people would want
to go back to the gold standard, and cryptocurrencies are an unlikely option because
they are “even more risky”.
“Which
cryptocurrency would you use, which stable currency, and none of them have shown
to be particularly useful in international trade,” Bradlow said.
On
the creation of a separate BRICS currency, experts are sceptical.
“Creating
the BRICS currency will require a set of institutions,” Yu said. “Institutional
creation requires a common set of standards and underpinning values. These are very
difficult to achieve, although not impossible.”
Chris
Weafer, an investment analyst with Macro-Advisory, a strategic
consultancy that focuses on Russia and Eurasia, described the idea of a BRICS currency
as a “non-starter”.
“Even
people in various governments know that this is not going to happen, or not for
a very, very long time,” Weafer told Al Jazeera.
Bradlow
agreed.
“The
idea of the BRICS creating an alternative to the dollar seems completely fanciful
and unrealistic,” he said, noting the major differences between the five economies.
“If
they did have a single currency uniting them, it would be dominated by the biggest
and most powerful economy in the grouping, which is China, and why would smaller
countries want to link their monetary policy and aspects of their fiscal policy
to the Chinese economy?” Bradlow said.
“It
would open up all sorts of areas of risk and constrain their freedom of action in
ways that would be unacceptable to all of them.”
While
talk of a possible currency has focused attention on options to replace the dollar,
South Africa’s BRICS ambassador, Anil Sooklal, said the
goal is less about replacing the dollar than giving the world more choices.
“BRICS
is not anti-West. We are not in competition,” Sooklal
told Al Jazeera. “Nor are we against the dollar. But what we are against is the
continued dominance of the dollar in terms of global financial interactions.”
Weafer said that regardless of what reforms BRICS
wants to implement, the grouping won’t have much room to develop if it is seen as
a choice between East and West or “the West and the rest”.
“I
don’t think anybody wants that,” he said.
Local
currencies
In
finding alternatives to the dollar, Weafer said BRICS
is likely to push for the greater use of local currencies.
“We
already know that 80 percent of the trade carried about between Russia and China
is settled in either Russian rubles or Chinese yuan,”
he said.
“Russia
is also trading with India in rupees … So you’re not talking
about a new currency, you’re talking about settling in the South African currency
or the Russian currency.”
Even
outside the core BRICS group, other countries have begun trading in local currencies.
The United Arab Emirates and India last month signed an agreement enabling them to settle trade payments in
rupees instead of dollars.
However,
the widespread use of local currencies also brings up a new challenge: convertibility.
Weafer said that countries carrying out more trade
also need to hold more of each other’s currency in reserve.
“And
you have to be able to convert them into your currency,” he said.
This
is difficult in India, where capital controls prevent people from taking money out
of the country without permission. Once the rupee is out of India, it still needs
to be converted into another currency – like the dollar – before it can be converted
into the local currency of choice.
“So
[there are] huge changes that have to take place; India would have to drop capital
controls and then there would have to be almost an alternative to the SWIFT banking
system the global system created, so as to allow the transfer of these currencies
between the trade partners, avoiding global sanctions, which would currently block
that,” Weafer said.
“And
then each country would have to hold more of the respective trade partner’s currency.”
These
changes would have to be implemented slowly and on a country-by-country
basis, he said.
Bradlow
said BRICS countries holding more reserves of local currencies is a “highly questionable”
strategy as a reserve currency should be stable with access to liquid markets that
can be moved in and out of quickly.
“The
dollar is really the only currency that offers all those benefits at the moment,”
he said.
Bradlow
added that the question of who a country is trading with will also determine what
it is willing to accept.
For
example, South Africa, which does a lot of trade with China, may be keen to keep
reserves of yuan, but as its other major trading partners are in the West, it will
need more dollars than Brazilian reais or Russian rubles.
Dollar
to remain king
For
South Africa’s Sooklal and other BRICS leaders, the rationale
for alternatives to the dollar is similar to that for changing the global
governance architecture in general.
“We’d
like to live in a multipolar society, a multipolar world,” Sooklal
said.
“Trade
is no longer dominated by those countries that dominated trade in the 70s, 80s,
90s – that era is over. We also want to see a multipolarity of choices, a multipolar
financial world; we don’t want to be pegged to one or two currencies as the currencies
of choice,” he added.
Sooklal pointed to the Pan-African payment and settlement
system, a cross-border infrastructure to facilitate direct payment transactions
across the continent, as a model to follow. He said it will save an estimated $5bn
annually in trade transaction fees when compared with just using SWIFT.
Still,
analysts say the dollar will remain king for the foreseeable future.
According
to Weafer, we are still “decades” away from anything really
challenging its dominance.
He
said that even if the BRICS create a common currency, it may eventually work similarly
to the Euro, which has not seriously challenged the dollar’s dominance.
For
oil and other commodities, “the reference price is the dollar price”, Weafer said, explaining that countries using alternative currencies
will still use the greenback to determine the value of what they buy and sell.